Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

big eddie is giving wasserman-schultz hell about impeachment!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:17 PM
Original message
big eddie is giving wasserman-schultz hell about impeachment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. i've been listening! AMAZING!!
he's GREAT (and i never thought i'd say that)

and i can't believe WHAT THE FUCK IS SHE SAYING???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That is amazing..so big eddie is
For Impeaching the dick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. Has been early on
he was the first host to go after it in a major way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. She was insistent that impeachment would be
a distraction to getting other priorities from moving forward. Ed held his ground, but I wish he would have made a point about how lack of impeachment destroys the rule of law for the future.

She made me want to SCREAM. ....as if she thinks that everything they may try to accomplish won't just be vetoed.

props to Ed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. Getting this country back on track is priority 1
and impeachment is step 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
45. that woman needs her head examined.
there is no money for anything until they get this crazy assed war over

they SWORE an OATH to DEFEND and UPHOLD the Constitution. THey can't decide when that is.

They haven't done anything and won't. Get a brain, lady. You haven't done anything and you won't until you understand the country wants this and will support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
46. Sad --- because if this is the FLA rep . . . Debbie Wasserman-Schultz . . . ???
she's been good on many issues . ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
51. Randi is saying the democrat leadship is threatening the junior reps

She knows Debbie & loves her.

I have always been impressed with Debbie, something is going on here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. saying such things as it would divide the country
but isn't the country already divided.
and a few other things. Why do they keep on saying they are working on all these bills but when they put them forth, they get vetoed anyway, productivity??? what productivity nothing is being passed with these morons in abuse of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. I'm tempted to scare them with the following call, which many here with Rethug reps can do...

Debbie, what are you doing trying to shut down efforts to pursue justice and protecting the rule of law being followed by the highest offices of the land. WHAT could be more important than that?

I've been a progressive Democrat, but heck, even my Republican representative, Brian Bilbray, voted to keep impeachment "on the table" in the House the other day when so many of you DIDN'T! Hmm... Makes me wonder how I should vote in 2008 for a rep that supports the rule of law. I'm sure many in your district are wondering the same thing!

(even though you and I KNOW we would never vote for a Rethug, I think in this case, their votes could be used to serve a useful purpose to help scare them back into serving the people instead of the corporatocracy!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. SHAME SHAME SHAME ON WASSERMAN-SCHULTZ! SHAME ON HER!
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 01:31 PM by orleans
i can't believe what i just heard

i liked her

i am so taken aback, i'm speechless

note to debbie:
I heard you on the Ed Schultz show. I absolutely cannot believe what i heard you saying. You are so wrong--SO WRONG. We want you to stand up and impeach Cheney. We want you to hold this administration to account. THAT IS THE PEOPLE'S BUSINESS AND YOU REFUSE TO DO IT. You are a complete and total disappointment to me. You should be ashamed of yourself. The fact that they "only have another year" DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR, AND SHOULD NOT ALLOW THEM TO GET AWAY WITH IT!

anyone with an address in her district--i hope you contact her NOW!
http://wassermanschultz.house.gov/zipauth.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Didn't she swear to uphold the constitution? They broke laws and deserve justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The anger will just build.
Do you know what they stand for anymore? We have a confused bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I believe she'd be for it if she wasn't stuck carrying water at this point for
the same powerful Dems that are discouraging impeachment and accountability for Bush and who wanted Dean out as DNC chair.

She made her choice to throw down with a SIDE of the Dem party that shouldn't be an easy fit for her no matter how hard she tries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. and we cannot risk the chance of having them in for another year.
we cannot risk it at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday_Morning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. She's on the judiciary committee
You don't have to be in her district to email her here:

http://judiciary.house.gov/contact.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. thanks for the link! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
65. IMO
When an elected official blatantly DISREGARDS the safeguards and tools provided by the US Constitution... it's called TREASON. Allowing these war criminals to continue putting BOTH our country and our military in danger is unforgivable. It's sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. And to think,,,,
I used to really think she had it together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. so did i. FUCK HER! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. I just caught
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 01:30 PM by vpilot
the tail end of he interview but I did hear her say that impeachment is not important to most Americans. I don't know where she got that idea from, but personally I think she if full of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. let her know she's incorrect about that
118 Cannon H.O.B
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-7931
Fax: 202-226-2052
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I'll second that and I'm on the phone right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. TOLL FREE SWITCHBOARD IN CONGRESS
1-800-828-0498
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. thank you!
light that switchboard up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. they want to hear from constituents -- IF YOU DON'T LIVE IN HER DISTRICT
DON'T TELL THEM.

I REFUSED TO TELL WHERE I LIVED. "ma'am, the congresswoman really wants to hear from her constituents so please give me your address"

i said it doesn't matter--i'm an american citizen and it doesn't matter if i live in florida, or anywhere else. WE WANT CHENEY IMPEACHED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. they have jurisdiction over the legislation...it impacts all of us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
35. Isn't she on the Judiciary Committee? If soi, she damn well better listen.
That commission means she represents all of us in preserving the Condtitution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
41. If you have to, use the address - or at least the zip code - of a relative
or friend who lives there. Even someone who lives NEAR there. Or if your kid or his/her best friend is in college in that state or in that community, or you used to live there. ANY excuse is acceptable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. Thanks. I called. (I live in her district.)
The aide said "things are hectic around here." LOL.

I told them what "everybody but Congressional Democrats seems to know, that Bill Clinton got impeached, and though it wasn't successful, it cost the Democrats the White House!"

I mentioned rule of law, defending the Constitution, and hanging the Republicans out with investigations for months to expose their misdeeds and malfeasance.

All very friendly, y'know.

Thanks for the number.

In a separate note yesterday, I said if she doesn't catch on, I'll support whomever runs against her in a primary.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. I also sent her links to this and another thread here.
:)

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. It's not for her to judge.
If the rule of law and the constitution wasn't important, impeachment wouldn't be in the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. not important to most Americans???
god, there is such a disconnect with the people it is shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. I heard it-Ed was relentless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. Missed the interview, damn it.
I'll have to listen to the re-broadcast of it this afternoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
16. A caller about a half hour ago made a great point
She said she can't use the excuse that there isn't enough time on her job, so Congress shouldn't be able to use that excuse either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. I can understand where she is coming from
The only way anyone in Congress is going to get behind this is if there is any chance for conviction, which at this point is infinitesimal. that's the biggest worry, she's not saying it isn't warranted. The last thing we need is a Bush acquittal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. no chance of that without investigations...so call those who control investigations
The House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties

http://judiciary.house.gov/committeestructure.aspx?comm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. when truth comes out, when the general public begins to learn all the
crap that has been going on, they will totally be behind this

this is how to inform the people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. Wrong! Clinton was acquitted -- and we lost the White House!
The party that impeaches -- or even threatens to impeach, ALWAYS takes the White House. Look it up.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. Basically it was a swiftboating of Clinton . . .
And, we also had a swiftboating of Carter . . .

though we didn't know what the term "swiftboating" meant at the time --- !!!


MSM going 24/7 after Dems ----


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #47
62. The antidote to swiftboating is impeachment!
Right now it's the answer for everything. :)

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
69. Impeachment means investigation with no possibility of "executive privilege".
Immobilize them with the investigation - Don't drag it out, but if a legitimately thorough investigation takes the rest of this president's term, so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. thank you ed schultz. today--you certainly spoke for me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
29. when i read the title of this post
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 01:45 PM by GreatCaesarsGhost
i thought it would be ed that was against impeachment. i'm shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. i listen to his show nearly every day because my "liberal" radio station
puts him on and then randi, and runs thom hartman after randi

i know the background of ed, i know he used to not be quite so "liberal" as he is, but it seemed to me something happened several months ago--and that was when he was talking impeachment.

first time i heard he was for it i was very surprised too.

he was great with w.schultz today

he was really kicking ass.

and she was making me scream and want to pull my hair out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
48. Do you have a link to this station --- call letters -- full name of host????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #48
78. yes. ed schultz show
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. thank you -- I'll tune in ---
I listen to AA Hartmann and Randi ---



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
33. Damn, I missed all but the end of it and that was getting a little
heated. During the little bit that I heard I couldn't believe what she was saying and Ed wasn't too pleased either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
42. is there an audio clip of this?
I never listen to Big Ed and I find this shocking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
43. Rough transcript of this posted at another thread:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelligesq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Schultz is on radio ? what station please? newbie here. n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #49
64. Link here. Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
50. Please explain how this would be a success...
Ed's argument seemd to be that we needed to actually get rid of Bush/Cheney (not just "make a statement") and that there was popular support for impeachment. There's also popular support fort S-CHIP and removal of the troops from Iraq, but Republicans are willing to block any action in the Congress. So, even if the House votes to impeach, the Senate will never vote to convict. Months of time will be spent by the House and Senate doing nothing else, Cheney will still be in office, and the Conservative media will trumpet the failure of the Senate vote as a "vindication" of the Bush/Cheney record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. If we do not move forward against these maniacs -


Count on a war in Iran. Count on elections being canceled. These people will not just go away quietly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. If your average citizen knew everything that has happened, I doubt very seriously
Edited on Thu Nov-08-07 04:16 PM by mmonk
they would refuse to impeach. The only way to inform the citizens is for the process to go ahead. No excuse for destroying our system of checks and balances is valid EVER. One is either for the constitution or they are against it. And don't begin to tell me it has been defended so far because of the so called oversight committees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. To quote teh congresswoman
then we shouldn't try?

I will add, to save the Constitution?

WOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. because people would be glued to the TV like they were with OJ and Monicagate
The media can not ignore an impeachment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
54. Go Ed.
More excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
56. I just went BRAVO ED
you tore her arguments apart

And we don't matter, the people don't matter....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
58. Finally got to hear it. Wow!
He made no bones about the fact that he is pissed off.

And he called her out on being more concerned about "timing" and "the media".

Right on, Ed. What ABOUT We The People, Debbie?

And as far as not seeing impeachment in the top 10?

So the fuck what?

I'll bet anything that option is climbing on the list.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. I tell you next year they will be shocked when they loose
the congress.

That caller to the eddie show, that's the way I feel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #59
71. Exactly.
They are putting all their eggs in the '08 basket, all the while alienating their own party.

Assholes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Put the top 10 together, and it spells impeachment.
Impeachment isn't the issue, it comprises all of the issues.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. Yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #61
72. That was exactly what I was thinking while I was listening to the
interview.

WHERE did the Iraq war some from?

WHERE did the energy policy (the one we don't really know much about) come from?

WHERE did a lot of the top 10 problems come from?

FROM CHENEY!!!

Impeachment of Cheney, and getting rid of him, won't solve all the problems, of course, but damn, at least it would stop him from continuing to create MORE.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #58
70. where did you hear it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. Ed's show is broadcast here in Seattle from noon to 3:00 pm.
That's when I listened to the interview, after reading about it on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
60. He Was Relentless - did she say
at one point his remarks were bordering on "mean"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
66. Randi also hammered Wexler about the leadership, about Wasserman-schultz and Klein. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Randi was great. They are friends, but it didn't stop her.
Randi's in the groove lately. I would hate to have her after me... :scared:

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #66
74. Heard that too.
That was also a great one.

What I wouldn't give to be a fly on the wall this weekend when Randi talks to Conyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
68. does anyone have a clip of this???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #68
75. I don't, but here's the link to his show site.
I know he does podcasts, but I think they cost $5.99 a month.

http://www.bigeddieradio.com/todayonshow/index.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. thanks, tried there already
Sometimes they put clips on for free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-08-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. Yeah, that's what I looked for first, but didn't find one.
Maybe they will put it up later.

Definitely worth the listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 02nd 2014, 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC