Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Damnedest thing you've ever seen."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:34 PM
Original message
"Damnedest thing you've ever seen."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071102/wl_asia_afp/usjapanwarnuclearbombsurvivors

Hiroshima survivors upset pilot never said sorry

Fri Nov 2, 12:27 AM ET

TOKYO (AFP) - Japanese survivors of the world's first nuclear attack on Hiroshima voiced regret Friday that the American pilot of the plane that dropped the bomb died without saying sorry.

Paul Warfield Tibbets, Jr., whose B-29 bomber dubbed the Enola Gay dropped the 9,000-pound "Little Boy" bomb on August 6, 1945, died Thursday at his home in the midwest city of Columbus, Ohio. He was 92.

Tibbets never expressed regret for the bombing that led to the end of World War II but at a horrific price: 140,000 dead immediately and 80,000 other Japanese succumbing in the aftermath, according to Hiroshima officials.

"He did not apologise, arguing, like the American government, that the bombing saved millions of American and Japanese lives by ending the war," said Nori Tohei, 79, who survived the bombing of the western Japanese city. snip

Although Tibbets saw little of the devastation wreaked on Hiroshima, he would walk the streets of Nagasaki a few weeks after the second atom bomb was dropped there.

"A couple of the streets we walked had swelled," he told the Columbus Dispatch in 2003, as he described the buckling of the earth caused by the intensity of the blast. "Damnedest thing you've ever seen."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Damnedest thing you've ever seen."
What a swell egg.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. well, his kharmic debt is going to have to be paid, especially since he never expressed
regret or remorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. he has no kharmic debt to pay over it.
it wasn't his decision to drop the bomb, and it DID prevent the need for an all out invasion of japan, which would have killed MANY MANY more people on both sides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. sorry, but "following orders" is NOT going to get one out of one's kharmic debt.
you do know, don't you, that the japanese were trying to surrender? or do you only follow the approved party line?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
41. you can't determine someone else's 'kharmic debt'...
in your mind, he has one...in my mind he doesn't. but the only one that matters is what's(was) in the mind of the person in question. he felt his actions were perfectly justified (as they were), so his kharmic slate is clean on the matter.

btw- the japanese weren't trying all that hard to surrender- even after the atomic bombs were dropped, the emperor had to step in to break a tie over the vote of whether to surrender.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. what we think of the matter? what was on his mind? you obviously don't understand much
about kharma--by your statement, no matter how heinous an action, if the person thinks it's okay, then there is a clean slate-- you mean like hitler, for example? the son of sam? jeffrey daumer?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. Uh, do you consider Karma to be something that actually exists?
As something more than randomness and the law of averages, I mean...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #49
59. what he (karlschneider) said...
plus one of these:

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. The only thing that matters is what was in the mind of the person
at the time?

Are you serious? That's your moral/ethical yardstick?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. 'kharma' is a personal thing, not an actual force.
each person has their own kharmic yardstick/moral compass...but it only works for themselves and their own actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. They chose him well
since he focused on damage to THINGS and completely missed the horror he brought to people.

It would have been possible to justify the bombing while apologizing to the poeple who had nothing to do with the war who were caught in its blast.

It just never occurred to him to try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. He was under no obligation to apologize--he does not bear the responsibility
for the decisions our government made at the time. And he did save countless AMERICAN lives by ending the Pacific war. Hey, let's not forget--the Japanese started it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. correct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Don't forget who started this mess in Iraq either n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Well, yeah, that was OUR bad. No doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
55. I hate this kind of talk
American lives are no more valuable than Japanese lives.

And if you can say the pilot is not responsible for the actions of the government, then surely you would agree that the Japanese civilians murdered on that day did not "start it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #55
60. Sorry, but I do value American lives more when we are attacked on
our own soil by an enemy. We had a right to defend ourselves, and we had a right to end the war in that manner--quickly and decisively, saving our own soldiers and resources in the process. The Japanese drove us to it--they were simply going to keep fighting. It's not desirable to target civilians, but...it sure had the desired effect, after 4 years of terrible loss and brutality. And if they had had the bomb, you can bet your ASS they would have used it on our cities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. I heard that he wanted to be buried in an unmarked grave
because he did not want anyone to wreak havoc on his grave marker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. That's sad--what a burden he must have carried around, even if he didn't publicly express it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. In their cultural belief this is significant
Because he died without acknowledging the hurt he caused he cannot pass on to a peaceful rest. They believe his spirit will be tethered to this realm and continue to suffer until he can let go of the pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eFriendly Donating Member (260 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Tibbets had absolutely nothing to apologize for, as far as I am concerned. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Our culture is not the only one to contain irrational whiners...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Tibbets merely flew the plane...
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 01:56 PM by Juniperx
Didn't the the guy who actually let the bomb fly commit suicide? I'd think that would be enough.

I'm reading stories today that this is a rumor... but Tibbets was the pilot, not the bombardier, so I doubt it was rumor. Where is the other guy?

That last interview with Tibbets was revealing... he kept repeating something about doing a job. He had his orders. What would have happened if he had disobeyed his orders?


Edited to find the name...

Maj. Thomas W. Ferebee, bombardier

Edited again to say, nope... he lived to be 81...

http://www.mishalov.com/Ferebee.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Missing the point
They are not upset that they did not receive an apology. In their belief system if a person dies with regrets or other issues unresolved they cannot move on. They become shackled to the earth. This is an expression of sympathy from them. Its like if someone died and a Christian expressed regret that they never accepted Jesus as their savior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Paul Tibbets saved my grandfather's life. In 1945 my grandfather,
who had been drafted into the army at the age of 37 and left a wife and daughter (my mom) behind, was headed for Japan with the invasion force. Because of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs, the invasion was cancelled and my grandfather spent the next year guarding Japanese POWs in the Phillippines. One of them gave him a scarf with Japanese writing on it, which we treasure to this day.

So I guess I don't harbor the man any ill will, for strictly personal reasons. I would never have known my grandfather if those bombs hadn't been dropped (he almost certainly would have died in the invasion).

War is a terrible thing. It forces men (and women) to do terrible things. Many innocent people die needless, horrific deaths. This is why we need to oppose it wherever and whenever we can.

We struck hard against Japan because they hit us first. But we struck the first blow against Iraq, so we can't complain much about what happens to us there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. and my dad's
My father was at Guadalcanal and Tulagi - he was preparing for the invasion of the "Home Islands" when the war ended - and that is what the bomb did - it ended the war.

Hiroshima was a truly horrible event, as was Nagasaki, and Hamburg and Dresden and London and Stalingrad and Warsaw and on and on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUSTANG_2004 Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
53. Yep, mine too
He was to be shipped to the Pacific theater after finishing training as a gunner in the Air Corps. Then the bomb was dropped and he went home instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. He was only following orders.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. People reading this thread need to know that there is another side.
There are historians who argue that the bombings were not necessary, and many more argue that all means to avoid the nuclear option were not taken. I'm agnostic on this issue. It's easy to play armchair quarterback, but also needed to avoid the same mistakes.

Here is a page containing the quick summary of reasons it might have been overkill:

http://www.doug-long.com/summary.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I'm on the fence too
I see both sides of the argument, and I empathize with both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
42. I'm with you on this one...
Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
20. More people would of died if there had been an invasion of Japan.
So dropping The Bomb was the right thing to do IMO. A few hundred thousand dead is better then several million dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. I am outraged at the Japanese
THEY invaded this country. THEY committed outrageous acts against our military. AND when it came to invading Japan and dropping the bomb I agreed with dropping the bomb. My dear friend was ready to go in the first wave to invade Japan and it probably saved his life.

And the Emporer of Japan had the chance to SURRENDER before theY dropped the first bomb and BEFORE theE DROPPED the SECOND bomb.So it was their choice.

Do you hear anybody walking around and saying they are sorry for all the lives lost in Japan's SNEAK attack on this country ..hell no...so it was their choice to invade, their choice to not surrender and they should be responsible for the bomb...period. I wish the people talking about this who don't know what the hell they are talking about WOULD SHUT UP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. THEY invaded this country?
Are you sure about that?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Yes, they did. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Hawaii didn't become one of the US states until 1959 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. They didn't invade Hawaii.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Well, they did hold a couple of Alaskan islands for awhile, so I
guess technically they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Same for Alaska. 1958 n/t
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 03:10 PM by NNN0LHI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. 1959, actually. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. It was a close call
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 03:14 PM by NNN0LHI
“President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the Alaska Statehood Act into United States law on 7 July 1958 which paved the way for Alaska’s admission into the Union on January 3, 1959.”

I think my point is still valid though.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. It was part of this country in 1942, though.
If you don't see that as Japan invading this country, you're moving the goalpost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Thats what our government said. Not the islanders who lived there
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/gp/17661.htm

Annexation of Hawaii, 1898

America's annexation of Hawaii in 1898 extended U.S. territory into the Pacific and highlighted resulted from economic integration and the rise of the United States as a Pacific power. For most of the 1800s, leaders in Washington were concerned that Hawaii might become part of a European nation's empire. During the 1830s, Britain and France forced Hawaii to accept treaties giving them economic privileges. In 1842, Secretary of State Daniel Webster sent a letter to Hawaiian agents in Washington affirming U.S. interests in Hawaii and opposing annexation by any other nation. He also proposed to Great Britain and France that no nation should seek special privileges or engage in further colonization of the islands. In 1849, the United States and Hawaii concluded a treaty of friendship that served as the basis of official relations between the parties.

A key provisioning spot for American whaling ships, fertile ground for American protestant missionaries, and a new source of sugar cane production, Hawaii's economy became increasingly integrated with the United States. An 1875 trade reciprocity treaty further linked the two countries and U.S. sugar plantation owners from the United States came to dominate the economy and politics of the islands. When Queen Liliuokalani moved to establish a stronger monarchy, Americans under the leadership of Samuel Dole deposed her in 1893. The planters' belief that a coup and annexation by the United States would remove the threat of a devastating tariff on their sugar also spurred them to action. The administration of President Benjamin Harrison encouraged the takeover, and dispatched sailors from the USS Boston to the islands to surround the royal palace. The U.S. minister to Hawaii, John L. Stevens, worked closely with the new government.

Dole sent a delegation to Washington in 1894 seeking annexation, but the new President, Grover Cleveland, opposed annexation and tried to restore the Queen. Dole declared Hawaii an independent republic. Spurred by the nationalism aroused by the Spanish-American War, the United States annexed Hawaii in 1898 at the urging of President William McKinley. Hawaii was made a territory in 1900, and Dole became its first governor. Racial attitudes and party politics in the United States deferred statehood until a bipartisan compromise linked Hawaii's status to Alaska, and both became states in 1959.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Why in the hell are you talking about Hawaii? Japan didn't invade Hawaii.
I haven't said a word about Hawaii.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. This is off topic,
but reading through your post, it just makes me shake my head whenever I hear Libertarians talk. They have this idea in their heads of a magical time when America stayed out of the affairs of other nations. There was never such a time. Not from the moment settlers landed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Exactly
I was in Hawaii, Pearl Harbor 3weeks ago for the submarine USS Wahoo memorial ceremony,
I met the son of the famous exec of the Wahoo, who wrote 2books about his experiences
The famous Medal Of Honor recipient Dick Okane, who would not have survived the captivity
at a POW camp in Japan, in fact he was so sick, he had less then 3weeks to live probably.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. Tit for tat...
they appologize for Pearl Harbor we appologize for the bomb.

But since Japan refuses to this day to appologize for basically starting a world war, they can go scratch for all I care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Much more than just Pearl Harbor. Nanking, Bataan Death March, Korean sex slaves, etc. etc.
It's a damned long list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Oh I know, I'm currently reading...
"The Rape of Nanking". Good lord. The Japanese Army back then gave a whole new meaning to the word atrocity.

What a heart breaking account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #35
50. hmm, you mean like the accounts of the atrocities committe against the indigenous people of this
land? care to read some of the history of this country? it isn't pretty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #50
57. okay, that was out of the blue.
thought we were talking about wwii.

I have read extensively on the crimes against the native americans.

anyway, have a nice day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. They do a lot of playing the victim
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 03:36 PM by mitchtv
yet they teach their children little of the crimes they perpetrated, and have been notoriously slow at handling claims against them for war crimes, so I have little sympathy. The pilot did his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
46. I hope you are outraged for all the Japanese war crimes against
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 04:06 PM by sfexpat2000
innocent civilians and their succeeding generations, too.

Because that would be justice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
56. Yeah, right
You're saying murdering hundreds of thousands of innocent people is justified because (fill in the blank).

Osama agrees.

The xenophobes that crop up every time this is brought up sicken me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
37. were there studies done on the environmental impact of the bombs? long term effects of radiation,
etc? I know there were some reports last year about children still being born with defects due to the bombs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Just that big lizard that stomped Tokyo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
43. Has the US ever apologized for murdering civilians?
Kind of like defining the difference between "unconventional warfare" and terrorism.

Or "freedom fighter" and terrorist.

Whether one makes a distinction between the two or not, some who were fighting for America in the Pacific when the bombs were dropped never got over feeling responsible for the horror that the Japanese civilians suffered. Pretty hard to feel proud of your own service while rationalizing or excusing all of those supposed "necessary casualties" in the single, most violent act in the history of mankind.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
45. Maybe this disgrace will just be bunched with the whole Bush residency. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zagging Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
48. Neither did those who filled the fuel tanks on Enola Gay.
Edited on Fri Nov-02-07 04:19 PM by zagging
Or those who refined the oil...
Or those who filled the tires with air so he could take off...
Or those who washed the windshield so he could see clearly...
Or those who made the steel for the aircraft...
Or those who built the runway...
Or the air traffic controllers who saw him safely into the sky...
Or those who tightened the bolts...
Or those who built the props...
Or the engineers who designed the plane...
Or the farmers who fed them all...

I really don't think placing such a burden one one man is proper. What happened, happened as a result of war, and the whole country was part of it. You can take it all the way back to the big bang, or the Creator if you prefer.

I'd probably be defensive and bitter too. RIP Colonel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-02-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
51. Have the Japanese ever apologized for Pearl Harbor and starting WW2?
I'm sincerely asking, because I don't know.

If they haven't, feh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC