I do not have a candidate, but I am annoyed at the "Full Howard Dean" that HC is getting on tv.

[SoCalDem]

I know that front runner traditionally gets more scrutiny, but there is MORE to this than the normal looking-over.

Isikoff is in full-whine mode, recounting all his troubles in getting hold of her "papers" from the Clinton White House, and seems to think that it's ESSENTIAL that everyone have access to those notes, conversations & appointments.

WTF??

When we are STILL WAITING to get the PRESIDENTIAL papers of Reagan & Bush 1 released (there's probably less than a clothes-basketful after all these years of careful scrubbing :grr: ), and no one seems to even care anymore.

And look back to 2k..*²'s "colorful" history was glossed over with a few well-chosen sentences, repeated over and over, and referred to as "a long time ago..old news..move on"..

She may not utter "YEE HAWWW", but getting the full "treatment"..


Rudy's dirty laundry gets a cursory sniff now and then, and then gets tossed back into the pile, but the republicans, as a group, are getting the white-glove treatment.

The other republicans are so not-interesting, so maybe that's the reason, but I see a very dangerous passage ahead for HC (and whomever they may elevate, if they take her down)..

Looks like the memos have been faxed around to corporate media-land

[The_Casual_Observer]

1. If they haven't taken her down yet they aren't going to.

Although it's hard to digest by many at DU, her recent votes have all stymied the bastard
gopers who are baiting her to go "soft on terror".

[book_worm]

2. Hillary hasn't gotten anything near the assault by the media that Dean was getting at this time

in 2003.