Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Webb: Lieberman And Kyl’s Hawkish Iran Amendment Is ‘Cheney’s Fondest Pipe Dream’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:21 PM
Original message
Webb: Lieberman And Kyl’s Hawkish Iran Amendment Is ‘Cheney’s Fondest Pipe Dream’
Edited on Tue Sep-25-07 12:22 PM by babylonsister
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/25/webb-kyl-lieb-iran/

Webb: Lieberman And Kyl’s Hawkish Iran Amendment Is ‘Cheney’s Fondest Pipe Dream’

On the Senate floor today, Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) made an impassioned appeal to his fellow senators, declaring that the Lieberman-Kyl amendment on Iran should be “withdrawn” because the “proposal is Dick Cheney’s fondest pipe dream.” Webb cautioned that the “cleverly-worded sense of the Congress” could be “interpreted” to “declare war” on Iran. He continued:

Those who regret their vote five years ago to authorize military action in Iraq should think hard before supporting this approach. Because, in my view, it has the same potential to do harm where many are seeking to do good.

“At best, it’s a deliberate attempt to divert attention from a failed diplomatic policy,” said Webb. “At worst, it could be read as a backdoor method of gaining Congressional validation for military action, without one hearing and without serious debate.”

Watch it at link~

Webb said that amendment’s attempt to categorize the Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp as “a foreign terrorist organization” would, for all practical purposes, “mandate” the military option against Iran. “It could be read as tantamount to a declaration of war. What do we do with terrorist organizations? If they are involved against us, we attack them.”

He also slammed the lack of debate and examination that was accompanying the amendment, saying “this is not the way to make foreign policy”:

We haven’t had one hearing on this. I’m on the Foreign Relations Committee, I’m on the Armed Services Committee. We are about to vote on something that may fundamentally change the way the United States views the Iranian military and we haven’t had one hearing. This is not the way to make foreign policy. It’s not the way to declare war.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pipe dream? More like Cheney's wet dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd bet you $10 that's what he would have liked to have said, but
wouldn't have been semenly on the Senate floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Problem is, "pipe dream" and "wet dream" have two distictly different meanings. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I like Pipe Dream..it denotes ol darth
sittin' around smokin' whatever shit he smokes, dreamin' up more ways to Fuck over the USA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. The Stovepipe.
Cheney's alimentary canal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. This just better lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Fascist lieman and the repuke kyl
being sneaky trying to get us into war..godamn them to hell and put them in uniform and send them to Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It should be noted that this will get nowhere without the help of the majority of the rest of the
Senate, so perhaps the blame should be spread around some.
Every Senator who supports this is equally responsible for making terrible, tragic policy, should it pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Oh yeah, those two are just
initiating it. It bloodly well better not pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. This should be our line in the sand here. Any one who supports this idiocy
should be evicted from the Senate.

This should also be the top post of the day. this is very important people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Doesn't Sen. Reid have any control whatsoever over what comes to the floor?
Resolutions to condemn this, censure that, endorse whatever -- if they amount to squat anyway, it's a waste of taxpayer money. But if they have any legally binding components, they're dangerous as all hell. So why allow it?

A simple countermeasure might just be to eliminate the "sense of the senate" bullshit entirely. Amend the senate rules to avoid giving the evil cloWn his carte blanche for war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. From the bottom of my heart:
Bless you, Senator Webb. You hit it dead on. And thanks for posting this babylonsister. You've done great work on shedding light on this vile amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. kick
vitally important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Excellent analysis of this amendment by Josh Marshall at TPM
Watch the video.
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

compares it to clinton (Dumbass) support for regime change in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. CALL your Senators NOW---Dem and REPUG alike--Say NO to Kyl-Lieberman
'sense of Senate"-----

Let them know! NOW. please.
and don't say they will not listen. who cares---give the staff a rough time and let them know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. Reid announces he has not made up his mind about kyl/lieberman
It may be revised.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/25/reid-lieberman-kyl-amendment-being-revised/

I don't know why Reid could not have just said
"I will oppose this as it now stands" or something stronger, like Jim Webbs comments

weak leadership begets bad wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC