Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Leahy adds amendment to Defense bill to repeal law making it easier to declare Martial Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 06:35 PM
Original message
Leahy adds amendment to Defense bill to repeal law making it easier to declare Martial Law
Actually it's Leahy and Bond- and it's good to have a wingnut on board with this. It makes the odds of it passing MUCH stronger. From a press release from Leahy:

Senate Adds National Guard Empowerment Features To Defense Bill;
Guard Also Wins As ‘Insurrection Act Rider’ Is Headed For Repeal

Guard Caucus Leaders Leahy And Bond Hail Victories For Empowerment Act

WASHINGTON (September 21) – Two top legislative priorities of the National Guard now are on track as the Senate Thursday night added key components of the National Guard Empowerment Bill to this year’s Defense Authorization Bill. The provisions of the National Guard Empowerment Bill, combined with legislation already in the bill to repeal a year-old law that amends the Insurrection Act to make it easier for presidents to declare martial law and to take control of the Guard from governors, would strengthen the Guard’s mission in supporting civilians in domestic emergency response and to ensure that the 500,000-person force has a meaningful voice in key budget and policy decisions.

Senate National Guard Caucus Co-Chairs Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Kit Bond (R-Mo.) are behind both efforts. Earlier this year Leahy and Bond introduced their bipartisan National Guard Empowerment Act, featuring four core initiatives to give the National Guard more bureaucratic muscle in the Department of Defense. The provisions incorporated into the Defense Authorization bill will give the National Guard budget power, make the Deputy of the United States Northern Command an officer of the National Guard, and elevate the Chief of the National Guard to the rank of four-star general. Only one provision of the Guard Empowerment Act -- to make the Chief of the National Guard a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the top military advisory panel to the President -- was cut from the bill, though the Chief will now have a direct channel to the senior leadership. The Leahy-Bond Guard Empowerment provisions will face another hurdle when the Senate bill goes to conference with the counterpart House Defense Authorization Bill, passed in July.

The Senate’s Defense Authorization Bill also includes a Leahy-Bond measure, drawn from a bill they have introduced together, to restore the Insurrection Act to its original form. Last year’s Defense Authorization Bill contained language making it easier for the President to take control of the National Guard and use the entire military in domestic law enforcement. The changes were made despite unified opposition from the nation’s governors, who have command and control of National Guard units in the states, as well as from the Senate National Guard Caucus, whose members total almost 90. Earlier this year, key national military and law enforcement officials testified against the advisability of the changes in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. The House’s counterpart bill includes a nearly identical repeal of last year’s changes, making its enactment virtually certain.

Both Leahy-Bond measures have the support of the National Governors Association, the National Guard Association, the Adjutants General Association, and several other organizations.

Leahy said, “The Guard is a 21st Century defense force trapped in a 19th Century bureaucracy. That now will change with this historic breakthrough. These reforms will strengthen the Guard’s organizational infrastructure by clarifying and underscoring its lines of authority. It will support and empower the men and women of the Guard by preserving local control and by giving the Guard the voice it needs and deserves to carry out its missions at home and abroad.” Leahy also is a senior member of the Appropriations Committee’s Defense Subcommittee, which handles the Senate’s work in writing the annual Defense budget bill.

“The National Guard is critical to our security at home and abroad. Despite the Guard's importance to the military team abroad and the homeland security team at home, they have been left out of the huddle on many key decisions. This victory is an important step in giving them the bureaucratic muscle they need," said Bond. "While the bill will make significant improvements in the way the Pentagon operates we must continue to narrow the cultural divide that exists between our active and reserve forces and impacts the ability of the team to work cohesively at all levels.”

After Senate passage, which is expected next week, the final version of the bill will be negotiated by a House and Senate conference committee.

http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200709/092107.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Great news. Now will this too be filibustered? Seems we get shot
down at every turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No. I'm almost sure it won't be
Bond's co-sponsoring or the amendment is a strong indicator that it will pass- and probably quite easily. Sounds like Leahy thinks the problem will come in conference, when House pukes will fight it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hope you're right.
One name - Hagel. That didn't work. But I'll remain hopeful-again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick.
This is important. And where are all the people always talking about how we're on the brink of martial law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. a girl can dream, right?
kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick for substtantive good news n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Great News! Recommended!
Some sanity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks!
Things like this give me a teeny bit of hope. Now will someone please give this a fifth rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, please, get this on the
Front Page so people can get the good news about no "martial law" in the midst of Ahmadinejad's threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wasn't terribly worried about this law but kudos to Leahy and Bond
this president gained way too much power over the last 7 years, its time to start stripping away at that power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I tend to agree with you
The most important part of the amendment is actually about the National Guard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. I can see the signing statement coming from clear over the horizon
Edited on Mon Sep-24-07 09:16 PM by IDemo
And speaking of that, wasn't there also a bill in the works to eliminate or significantly lower the number of signing statements?

edit - Looks like an investigation , not a bill, was in the works last June by John Conyers and Robert Byrd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Alas, that's always a concern n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. This part is key-
"The Senate’s Defense Authorization Bill also includes a Leahy-Bond measure, drawn from a bill they have introduced together, to restore the Insurrection Act to its original form. Last year’s Defense Authorization Bill contained language making it easier for the President to take control of the National Guard and use the entire military in domestic law enforcement."

Good for them.

Now, can someone explain why NATIONAL guard troops are in a foreign country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-25-07 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
16. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC