Petraeus follows Powell tactic of unverifiable Iraq claims

[NNN0LHI]

https://register.medianewsgroup.com/reg/login.htm?url=http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_6824982?nclick_check=1

By Paul Krugman
Article Launched: 09/07/2007 01:34:04 AM PDT

In February 2003, Secretary of State Colin Powell, addressing the U.N. Security Council, claimed to have proof that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. He did not, in fact, present any actual evidence, just pictures of buildings with big arrows pointing at them saying things like "Chemical Munitions Bunker." But many people in the political and media establishments swooned: They admired Powell, and because he said it, they believed it.

Powell's masters got the war they wanted, and it soon became apparent that none of his assertions had been true.

Until recently I assumed that the failure to find WMD, followed by years of false claims of progress in Iraq, would make a repeat of the snow job that sold the war impossible. But I was wrong. The administration, this time relying on Gen. David Petraeus to play the Colin Powell role, has had remarkable success creating the perception that the "surge" is succeeding, even though there's not a shred of verifiable evidence to suggest that it is.

Thus Kenneth Pollack of the Brookings Institution - the author of "The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq" - and his colleague Michael O'Hanlon, another longtime war booster, returned from a Pentagon-guided tour of Iraq and declared that the surge was working. They received enormous media coverage; most of that coverage accepted their ludicrous self-description as critics of the war who have been convinced by new evidence.

A third participant in the same tour, Anthony Cordesman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, reported that unlike his traveling companions, he saw little change in the Iraq situation and "did not see success for the strategy that President Bush announced in January." But neither his dissent nor a courageous rebuttal of O'Hanlon and Pollack by seven soldiers actually serving in Iraq, published in the New York Times, received much media attention.

[simmonsj811]

1. if it's not a

written report who cares what the hell he says
save the willy nilly report for the chimp