|
Edited on Fri Feb-09-07 10:37 AM by theboss
I used to subscribe to Entertainment Weekly until it went downhill.
I will occasionally buy People, though these days Us Weekly is better.
I think Deadspin.com is the greatest web site in the history of the Ebays.
And I am friends with one of the people who run Television Without Pity and Fametracker. So, not only do I read those sites daily, I correspond occasionally with the editor.
I also subscribe to The Washington Post, subscribe to the Economist, read Time, read the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on line, read the political articles in Rolling Stone (which I subscribe to), and buy the Atlantic. Will buy USA Toady if I am desperate for bathroom reading. And I read a gazillion different political blogs - most of which are pretty stupid.
My point: I am more than capable of thinking about Iraq, Iran, the Sudan, global warming, and people Dick Cheney may or may not have shot in the face....while simultaneously thinking about Anna Nicole Smith, Andy Dick, Lindsay Lohan, and Britney Spears' lack of underwear.
There is nothing that is a distraction in my world....And I don't consider myself that smart. (Well, I do...but I don't want to be arrogant).
So, don't act like my current obsession with Anna Nicole Smith (and, my gosh, is this a fascinating tale) is distracting me from the never-ending surge debate. Frankly, I'm thankful I don't have pay attention to arcane Senate rules on an ultimately meaningless resolution for a few days.
And also don't act like if Larry King suddenly spent the next 3 months discussing nothing but global warming, the rest of the country would be in the streets demanding solar powered cars. In order to "distract" someone, they have to be paying attention. 5 million people combined watch Larry King, Bill O'Reilly, and Keith Olbermann. 29 million watch American Idol.
So...I think Howard K. Stern is suddenly in position to personally control a gazillion dollar inheritance. Does anyone find that...interesting...besisde me?
|