Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK. Is it politically incorrect to use the term politically incorrect?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:54 PM
Original message
Poll question: OK. Is it politically incorrect to use the term politically incorrect?
Edited on Sun Aug-19-07 09:00 PM by MyPetRock
Inquiring minds need to know!

on edit: I mean according to DU standards.

Poll result (41 votes)
Yes. (9 votes, 22%)Vote
No. (7 votes, 17%)Vote
WTF? (17 votes, 41%)Vote
Other. (8 votes, 20%)Vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Democratic discussion forum
   Replies to this thread
  - "politically incorrect" kinda strikes me as a PC term itself, so no. (nt)  Posteritatis   Aug-19-07 08:59 PM   #1 
  - As long as it's understood  baldguy   Aug-19-07 08:59 PM   #2 
  - My Pet Obsession  ruggerson   Aug-19-07 09:00 PM   #3 
  - Nope. Just curious.  MyPetRock   Aug-19-07 09:02 PM   #6 
  - Dunno, but it's become a fairly meaningless term, nowadays.  Hissyspit   Aug-19-07 09:00 PM   #4 
  - My Pet Tic  Bluebear   Aug-19-07 09:01 PM   #5 
  - Politically correct, politically incorrect: these are right wing terms.  Opposite Reaction   Aug-19-07 09:04 PM   #7 
  - Exactly  RufusTFirefly   Aug-19-07 09:08 PM   #8 
  - Is Salman Rushdie a rich white Christian man?  Boojatta   Aug-19-07 09:16 PM   #10 
     - ..  Bluebear   Aug-19-07 09:19 PM   #12 
     - Edit: self-delete. nt  blondeatlast   Aug-20-07 05:38 PM   #20 
  - Historically, they're not RW at all.  igil   Aug-19-07 09:30 PM   #13 
  - Poll question: Do you think Rove is a closet gay?  Bluebear   Aug-19-07 09:08 PM   #9 
  - What an offensive question. Please try to be more sensitive in the future  jgraz   Aug-19-07 09:16 PM   #11 
  - Apparently So  Raejeanowl   Aug-19-07 09:37 PM   #14 
  - It is rightwing framing.  endarkenment   Aug-20-07 07:28 AM   #15 
  - CLUTCH THE PEARLS!!! White folks have been called out on their browbeating...  BlooInBloo   Aug-20-07 02:20 PM   #16 
  - its funny to hear someone whine so much when they accuse others of being overly sensitive.  lionesspriyanka   Aug-20-07 03:11 PM   #17 
  - "Politically correct" was probably coined by Frank Luntz to make fun  Lex   Aug-20-07 05:35 PM   #18 
  - Close--I believe it was David Horowitz. It does sound absolutely Luntzian, however. nt  blondeatlast   Aug-20-07 05:39 PM   #21 
     - Thanks.  Lex   Aug-20-07 05:43 PM   #22 
     - The term was popularized by Christopher Cerf  Lydia Leftcoast   Aug-20-07 08:31 PM   #26 
  - can we still call Robb a dingbat??  Blue_Tires   Aug-20-07 05:36 PM   #19 
  - Robb is an aerially-inclined rodentium with a dented chassis.  Bucky   Aug-21-07 04:01 PM   #31 
  - Don't be so sensitive when you are called out for being, well, un-PC. That's about as PC as it gets.  blondeatlast   Aug-20-07 05:46 PM   #23 
  - Not politically incorrect, just dunb or decietful  booley   Aug-20-07 08:15 PM   #24 
  - The current use of "politlcally correct" is a rightwing distortion of  Lydia Leftcoast   Aug-20-07 08:30 PM   #25 
  - Because you just don't know what you're allowed to say any more!  BlooInBloo   Aug-20-07 08:33 PM   #27 
  - You forgot "lighten up!" nt  Bluebear   Aug-20-07 08:33 PM   #28 
     - Gah! Thank you!  BlooInBloo   Aug-20-07 08:37 PM   #29 
  - No, but it IS part of a follow-the-herd mentality.  Bucky   Aug-21-07 03:58 PM   #30 
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. "politically incorrect" kinda strikes me as a PC term itself, so no. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. As long as it's understood
that there's more "political correctness" in the conservative block than anywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. My Pet Obsession
eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Nope. Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dunno, but it's become a fairly meaningless term, nowadays.
Edited on Sun Aug-19-07 09:01 PM by Hissyspit
...in its usage in all kinds of context and meaning.It's all judgments and conflict and prioritization of values. Some use the term to belittle or marginalize other's judgments or values. Some use the term to point out hypocritical assessments. Others use the term to paint assessments as hypocritical when they are not.

I try to avoid using it. But I guess I'm being "politically correct" when I do that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. My Pet Tic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Politically correct, politically incorrect: these are right wing terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Exactly
Edited on Sun Aug-19-07 09:09 PM by RufusTFirefly
Anyone who seeks respect for anyone other than rich white Christian men is deemed "politically correct."

Tom Tomorrow had a great cartoon on this topic. I'm afraid I couldn't find it though. Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Is Salman Rushdie a rich white Christian man?
The "Sir" of knighthood suggests that some people are seeking respect for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. ..
Edited on Sun Aug-19-07 09:24 PM by Bluebear
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Edit: self-delete. nt
Edited on Mon Aug-20-07 05:47 PM by blondeatlast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Historically, they're not RW at all.
In fact, when it started being applied by the RW it was deeply ironic. It was a 1920s ('30s?) Russian CPSU term, translated, and used by the American party. Authoritarian, but not RW. Sheehan may consider Stalin to have been fascist, but I can't.

Politicheski pravil'no, politically correct (with an alternative translation that's far too clunky, 'correct per policy'). Since the CPSU had eternal yet oft-changing policies/politics, while forming the very definition of Communist morality, it was a potent term. One should think and act according to party politics/policies; such thought and actions were politically correct, and it was a very positive evaluation. To have your actions or friends or whatever described as politically incorrect was a warning: You're out of step with the party, and egregious bits of political failure would mean you've placed yourself out of the party, whatever your membership card said.

We see that kind of thinking on all parts of the political spectrum. Voting for the
Iraq war was incorrect politics; voting for Southbridge (?) to be approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee is counter to proper Democratic politics. In both cases, the acts judged politically incorrect by some were grounds for saying that regardless how the politicians voted otherwise, they were no longer true Democrats. A fallacy, and probably as many such examples can be found on the right as on the left.

One can apply it to individual opinions and utterances, as well. Just because a locution is overused doesn't mean that it does not have meaning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Poll question: Do you think Rove is a closet gay?
Edited on Sun Aug-19-07 09:14 PM by Bluebear
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Are you upset that that was locked, is that what this is all about? Because besides your politically incorrect polls it's about your only appearance here since May.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. What an offensive question. Please try to be more sensitive in the future
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-19-07 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Apparently So
I've been censured quite recently for using the "politically correct" term, so I apologized and called the person a garden-variety hypocrite instead.

We do know what we mean when we say it, so if someone would prefer I be iconoclastic or simply rude and impatient or whatever pops their balloon when they deserve it rather than - gads! - politically incorrect, I'm sure I could accommodate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. It is rightwing framing.
If you want to continue helping the fascist kleptocracy with their mind-numbing propaganda barrage that has half the population dazed and confused, by all means keep on using that term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. CLUTCH THE PEARLS!!! White folks have been called out on their browbeating...
... racism/sexism-dismissing term "politically correct"!! Oh the pain! Oh the horror! We poor, poor, oppressed white men can't get away with ANYTHING any more! Why can't you brown or penilely-challenged folks just let us dismiss you? Throw us a bone here!


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. its funny to hear someone whine so much when they accuse others of being overly sensitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. "Politically correct" was probably coined by Frank Luntz to make fun
of people who don't say the "N-word" or call homosexuals "fags."

Seems like something the right-wingers made up to lash out at people trying not to used bigoted or hateful words.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Close--I believe it was David Horowitz. It does sound absolutely Luntzian, however. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Thanks.

I figured it was one of those jerks. They are crafty and evil in their manipulation of terms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. The term was popularized by Christopher Cerf
(see my post #25)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. can we still call Robb a dingbat??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. Robb is an aerially-inclined rodentium with a dented chassis.
And you can't spell "dented chassis" without "ass."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. Don't be so sensitive when you are called out for being, well, un-PC. That's about as PC as it gets.
Tetchy, aren't we? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. Not politically incorrect, just dunb or decietful
Politically incorrect has joined other words like Faith based and Compassion into the worl do Orwellian newsspeak

Nowadays , the phrase is typically used as a cover when someone wants to say something racist, biased or stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
25. The current use of "politlcally correct" is a rightwing distortion of
an actual leftist term.

In traditional leftist groups, there was often a doctrinaire Marxist who would object to some tactic or idea by saying, "That's not politically correct." What that meant was that it was not according to strict Marxist doctrine.

The current usage began with Christopher Cerf, who's a right-winger, making fun of using more sensitive language. To a certain extent, he had a point. "Developmentally disabled" is a euphemism for "mentally retarded," which is a euphemism for "feeble-minded," which is a euphemism for the early twentieth century terms of "moron, imbecile, and idiot," all of which were originally scientific terms for different degrees of retardation. You can call those particular people whatever you want; what matters is how you treat them. Changing the terminology didn't change the way the people designated by the term were treated.

"Hearing impaired" and "visually impaired" are actually more accurate terms, because not all people who don't hear or see well enough to function in society without some sort of assistance are totally deaf or totally blind. However, I've noticed that people who have these conditions refer to themselves as "blind" or "deaf."

Some of the terms that have become famous were actually made up by Christopher Cerf. Nobody ever seriously used "vertically challenged" for "short" or "follicly challenged" for "bald."

Now the right wing has run away with the term. If you object to racist, sexist, or homophobic utterances, you're being "politically correct."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. Because you just don't know what you're allowed to say any more!
It's SO HARD to know when you're being offensive! Everybody is so sensitive! Can't they just take joke?

:rofl:

DUers slay me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. You forgot "lighten up!" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-20-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Gah! Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
30. No, but it IS part of a follow-the-herd mentality.
90% of the time people who complain about "PC" terminology are really complaining against exercising good manners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 25th 2013, 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC