Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

E. J. Dionne on why the Democrats caved.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 10:46 PM
Original message
E. J. Dionne on why the Democrats caved.
Nothing I am reading makes me feel any better about this issue. It does not make sense...why it was bought to vote..why so many voted yes. None of it makes sense.

Why the Democrats Caved

Shortly before noon last Saturday, about 20 House Democrats huddled in Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office to decide what to do about a surveillance bill that had been dumped on them by the Senate before it left town.

Many of the Democrats were furious. They believed they had negotiated in good faith with Mike McConnell, the director of national intelligence. They sought to give the Bush administration the authority it needed to intercept communications involving foreign nationals in terrorism investigations while preserving some oversight.

But the administration held out for granting McConnell and Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales more power while seriously circumscribing the role of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The Senate's Democratic leadership, lacking the votes to pass a measure more to the House's liking, gave the administration what it wanted. At one point, according to participants in the Pelosi meeting, the passionate discussion veered toward the idea of standing up to the administration -- even at the risk of handing President Bush a chance to bash Democrats on "national security," as is his wont.

..."Several members from swing districts -- including Reps. Heath Shuler of North Carolina and Patrick J. Murphy of Pennsylvania -- expressed openness to having Congress stay in town to fight if important constitutional issues were at stake.

But the moment passed. Even some very liberal Democrats worried about the political costs of blocking action before the summer recess. That Saturday night, the House sent the president a bill that, as a disgusted Rep. David Wu (D-Ore.) put it, with just a touch of exaggeration, "makes Alberto Gonzalez the sheriff, the judge and the jury."


They knew exactly what they were voting for.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. The only thing that makes sense is what most folks do not want
to face, they are in it

I hate to say it, but who benefits, and ocam's razor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Why Would They Be Complicit in their Own Defeat Next Year
They gave the regime a license to Watergate all the Democratic campaigns next year.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3438520
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. The answer is staring you in the face
they are complicit because we are now an empire

They know that...

Yep, they also were most likely given an offer they cannot refuse, but this country has crossed the rubicon and right now you have two major parties

No, not the ones you're thinking off

the Populist and we are taking it in the chin

And the Corporatist.

We have members of both parties as members of the corporatist... and now what we have is pure theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
33. You are so right...the Populist Party and the Corporatist Party.
I've come to the same conclusion myself over the past few days, and it's depressing as all hell. But hard as it is to accept, it's the reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
36. That Explanation Leaves Out More than It Explains
It resumes that religious freedom does not matter,
that reproductive freedom does not matter,
that it is OK to bring back the Crusades and the Inquisition…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
55. So let's toss the turds out with the repuke trash.
So what do we have to do to take back the Democratic Party?
Toss out 40 or so of them who voted for this treasonous, unconstutional monstrosity?
I'd say there are a whole lot more imperialists who need to go into the night.
Citizen Grand Juries might do the trick, in order to bring their criminality to the light of day.
And certainly, Bush and his Just Us Department will do all possible to slap any area of investigation -- from drug running to war mongering to illegal spying -- with a national security label to keep it under wraps.
No matter. Congress -- even one cobbled by corruption -- can investigate ANY government malfeasance.
Those who don't believe We the People are in charge are traitors.
All the guilty -- no matter the affiliation or label -- should be in Leavenworth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
32. How many are really paying attention? Maybe that is what the Democratic Leaders are banking on.
:shrug: Either that or they are all stupid which I don't buy. Either they are scared to death of bushco or they don't think we are paying attention. Why else are too believe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Scared to Death Seems the Most Likely
This wasn't triangulation. It was surrender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Only One Explanation. Bush Made Them An Offer They Couldn't Refuse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Anyone have a list of how our Dems voted..sorry
for asking, but I have missed out on much of this discussion. So disheartened I actually couldn't "touch" this subject until now..all I want to know at this point is who sold us down the fucking creek on this one.

thanks
Blaze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. house.gov and senate.gov
They have all the roll call votes online.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. thanks..
watching my 6 month old granddaughter, I just truely fear for her future.

I feel quite strongly that my taxes are certainly not being represented, as to the wishes of an America majority.

Guess that was one of the first parts of our Constitution to be trashed..

CANNOT BELIEVE THEY DID THIS TO OUR COUNTRY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Here are the lists with links to their websites...
The Blue Dogs were the culprits and 6 New Democrats joined them.

The Fisa Vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't they ever actually talk to PEOPLE?
As opposed to consultants and pollsters and each other? Hello? Is this thing on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I love it that Pelosi got over 200,000 emails about it.
And I hope they ALL get an earful when they are on vacation in their districts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Me Too... That's My August Recess Prayer...
That they all go home, and get one hell of an ass chewing before returning.

They best be afraid of their base; more than the rePukes.

:mad:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. 200,000? Wow That's WONDERFUL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
39. Yes, But They LISTEN to Bush** Because He Has a Gun to Their Heads
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. A guy at 28% has blanks in his gun
He's a fucking lame duck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. But After They MIHOP Again, The Polls Will Have Him at 90%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. What a pathetic group of whipped, cringing, ball-licking dogs.
I am ashamed. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dionne's last paragraph gets it exactly right.
"But if legislation was needed, there were many ways to grant necessary authority while preserving real oversight. The Democrats got trapped, and they punted. The Republicans have never met a national security issue they're not willing to politicize. This is no way to run a superpower."

Maybe if we keep up the pressure, keep making the calls, emailing...our party will learn from this. If they don't stand up for us, there is no one else to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Not punt. Chuck. They chucked it. They are chuckers.
I may be wrong but I think chuckers chuck the ball when they get it, they toss it anywhere just to get out of the play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. So, former NFL QB Schuler wanted to "stay and fight"...
So why did he wind up voting to cave? :wtf:

In his case, "punt" is just about right. His team was down by two points with ten seconds left in the game, fourth-and-inches on the opponent's 45-yard-line. His choice? Punt.

Our loss is the NFL's gain. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. We're talking about one of the worst starting QB's in Saints' history
and man, oh man, is that saying something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. !)(*&&^*&^*(
The episode was the culmination of a shameful era in which serious issues related to national security and civil liberties were debated in a climate of fear and intimidation, saturated by political calculation and the quest for short-term electoral advantage.

Politically, Republicans won this round in two ways. They got the president the bill he wanted and, as a result, they created absolute fury in the Democratic base. Pelosi has received more than 200,000 e-mails of protest, according to an aide, for letting the bill go forward.

Democrats concede they made an enormous tactical blunder by not dealing with the issue earlier, forcing the question to the fore in the days before the recess. One anxiety hovered over the debate: If a terrorist attack happened and Congress had not given Bush what he wanted, the Democrats would get blamed for a lack of vigilance.


:banghead:

Nuff said...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Political cowardice
:thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick! And agree. Why? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
38. It looks and smells like either incompetence... or blackmail. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Those bastards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. if important constitutional issues were at stake? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. Hope they're satisfied that
they made the bushits happy and the people who know what's going on PISSED OFF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Were they assured re-election via the Rovian election system,
..fuckers. too many Joe Lieberman's to count anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #28
41. More Likely the Opposite
They have effectively conceded the elections.
Not only have they totally caved in and surrendered,
but they have given the Repiggies the authority to Watergate them with impunity, right up to election day and beyond.

I think they were threatened with MIHOP followed by martial law,
but if they bend over and let the Repiggies "win" next year nobody gets hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. "they have given the Repiggies the authority to Watergate them"
Don't let anybody get fooled. This is EXACTLY what they'll be using this for.

Midnight break-ins are now obsolete. They can now have ANY information they want at the push of a button.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. That's what I think too. Vichy.
My only hope now is they are stalling while allies prepare a way to help them fight the fascists. I don't think they can do it on their own now. Maybe they never could, not after seeing how far the fascists were willing to go after 9/11 and Katrina.
Not to mention the anthrax attacks and Iraq.

At this point it's a matter of picking out the collaborators from the capitulators. I don't even blame the capitulators so much, I wouldn't sacrifice an American city either.

But I sure as hell would be working on a plan and building alliances.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. The entire government has failed us on Iraq
For the president, and the majority leaders and candidates and rank-and-file Congressmen and Senators of either party—there is only blame for this shameful, and bi-partisan, betrayal.

Few men or women elected in our history—whether executive or legislative, state or national—have been sent into office with a mandate more obvious, nor instructions more clear:

Get us out of Iraq.

Yet after six months of preparation and execution—half a year gathering the strands of public support; translating into action, the collective will of the nearly 70 percent of Americans who reject this War of Lies, the Democrats have managed only this:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18831132/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. They're either complicit, spineless, idiotic, indifferent, take your pick...
none of them are good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. This-makes-me-sick!
Every time I think about this my blood pressure goes up!:grr:

Gonzo = sheriff, judge and jury....Is that scary or what?! After all the laws he's broken? They're absolutely INSANE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. Two blue dogs stood up for the constitution?
How did they VOTE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Schuler voted yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
31. Maybe THIS is what their plan is...
Maybe they are thinking, appear to cave on this, keep the base stirred up and remove the summer recess opportunity for the Bushies to be able to hammer the Democratic congress at will as being weak on terrorism.

Maybe when the Dems get back they will use the uproar of the base to push for changes and go from there.

One thing I've noticed in my time following politics is that the huge single blowhorn of a President is always much louder than that of the smaller blowhorns of congressional members.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
34. Anthrax, LIHOP, MIHOP ...
While I disagree with the vote itself, I am not entirely "baffled" by it when I consider the climate.
Key statement from the article: Most Democrats opposed the bill...

208 Democrats against
2 Republicans against

I expect we will rectify this in six months when the sunset deadline is up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #34
40. Too Late! The Authorizations Are Good for A YEAR
They can WATERGATE us throughout the upcoming election — legally!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
37. This makes no sense....
Instead of impeaching Bush for committing many felonies (wiretapping without a warrant in accordance with the law) they give him even more unconstitutional authority. WHAT THE HELL ARE WRONG WITH THE DEMS. THEY NEED TO GO!!! If there ever was a President and attorney general who cannot be trusted with such authorization, it is this one.

As soon as this bill is signed into the law it must be challenged in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
42. Nancy Pelousy n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
44. Dems didn't want to delay the vote they just wanted to get to the beach!
I think they could at least amended it at the last minute
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
45. E. J. Dionne? Who the hell is E.J. Dionne?
Are you guys still letting the MSM tell you what to think?

Geez, use your own head!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Mind boggling isn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. I agree but I have to say that I like Dionne
I read his column fairly regularly not because he speaks truth but simply because he has some independent thought. Some not groundbreaking stuff but some.

Regardless even of the 6-month thing they shouldn't had looked like they were helping Bush in any way shape or form.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #45
53. Run that by me again?
I gather you think what they did is either ok, or not so bad.

Help me understand...without the MSM I am nothing.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
49. their plan is to give bu$h* all he wants....boy that'll teach him....hot damn
:hurts: :hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts:hurts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
51. have blood, will boil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndlessMaze Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
54. I'm bummed as well, but we need to keep on keepin' on
Before I respond to this editorial, I would like to say that it is weird seeing all of your 1000+ post comments, compared my little 16th here. Am I the only new blood around here? I am in awe of you, but not intimidated.

So....Regardless of what you 100+ posters say about the Democrats, and their capability, I still believe that Will Pitt's posts last weekend need additional thought. I agree with him, that the Democratic party is our only option at this point. I am bummed out about their capitulation on spying as you all are, but I think that we need to get a grip, and move on.

More to follow on my next 17# POST somewhere in D.U. land....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. I agree they are our only option....and that scares me to death
if they are not willing to stand up against Bush's destruction of this country. It really does.

I do intend to keep on calling them out on this for that very reason...they are all we have. It is our job to hold them accountable.

I have never thought otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
downindixie Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
57. It will never change
If we start marching en mass maybe,but that calls on lazy,unconcerned American to do something.It will never change!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC