Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Richardson: The Best Civil Liberties Candidate for 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eggman67 Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:13 PM
Original message
Bill Richardson: The Best Civil Liberties Candidate for 2008
Edited on Tue Aug-07-07 07:15 PM by eggman67
http://civilliberty.about.com/b/a/257662.htm

After careful analysis of the platforms of all 18 major-party presidential candidates, I have come to an inescapable conclusion: From a civil liberties perspective, Bill Richardson should be the next President of the United States. No other candidate in the running, Democratic or Republican, comes close.

Bill Richardson addresses the concerns of the libertarian left as well as any viable Democratic candidate. He is pro-choice. He supports a national civil unions policy and an end to workplace discrimination against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals under Title VII standards. He supports a citizenship path for undocumented immigrants and a renewed commitment to the Geneva Conventions. This, in and of itself, is good but not remarkable.

What is remarkable is that he also addresses many of the concerns of the libertarian right. Often described as the NRA's favorite candidate, Richardson has a record on gun rights that most Republicans would envy. He has also taken on the property rights issues raised by Kelo v. New London more directly than most governors of either party can claim by establishing a task force, last year, with the specific goal of drafting statewide legislation to put an end to eminent domain abuse.


More at:
http://civilliberty.about.com/b/a/257662.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Richardson lied about being drafted by Major League baseball
Edited on Tue Aug-07-07 07:18 PM by billbuckhead
N.M. Gov Admits He Wasn't Baseball Pick

Nov 24 04:28 PM US/Eastern

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) - Gov. Bill Richardson is coming clean on his draft record—the baseball draft, that is, admitting that his claim to have been a pick of the Kansas City A's in 1966 was untrue.
For nearly four decades, Richardson, often mentioned as a possible Democratic presidential candidate, has maintained he was drafted by the Kansas City Athletics.

The claim was included in a brief biography released when Richardson successfully ran for Congress in 1982. A White House news release in 1997 mentioned it when he was about to be named U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. And several news organizations, including The Associated Press, have reported it as fact over the years.

But an investigation by the Albuquerque Journal found no record of Richardson being drafted by the A's, who have since moved to Oakland, or any other team.

Informed by the newspaper of its findings, the governor acknowledged the error in a story in Thursday's editions.

"After being notified of the situation and after researching the matter ... I came to the conclusion that I was not drafted by the A's," he said.
-------------------snip----------------------------
<http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8E325882&show_article=1>

I guess he was being 'libertarian" with the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. On the subject of lying
He said no such thing. What he did say is that he had thought he was drafted upon being offered a contract which he couldn't sign due to injury. He never said anything like that he lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Never let facts get in the way of billbuckhead bashing a Democratic candidate he doesn't like
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eggman67 Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The rest of the story
In the summer of 1967, he played for the amateur Cape Cod League's Cotuit (Mass.) Kettleers. The words "Drafted by K.C." appear next to his name on a faded team program, the Journal reported.

"When I saw that program in 1967, I was convinced I was drafted," Richardson said. "And it stayed with me all these years."

Then-general manager Arnold Mycock said the biographical information was supplied by players or their college coaches.

On a biographical sheet Richardson completed for Tufts in his junior year, he wrote, "Drafted by Kansas City (1966), LA (1968)." He said he wrote those words because he believed they were true.

"I never tried to embellish this," he said. "I never tried to mask it."



Ther's no reason to think this is any more than it is - am old oversight. But then you knew that. And this has sooooooo much to do with his actual positions on civil liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. An attempted smear...
of a Pro-gun Democratic Presidential Candidate by an anti-gun self proclaimed Democrat.

It makes me sad that I can not say I'm surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Sounds about as relevant as Al Gore and the Love Canal story
or his lullaby or the inventing the internet or the million other petty things the media blew out of proportion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bill's my number 2. Kucinich is number 1.
I have contributed to both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eggman67 Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kick for daytime viewers n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. I have great respect for him - I hope he will end up as VP for whoever runs
Don't get me wrong, if he can win the Nomination I will be more than Happy to support him for all I'm worth (can't say that about some of the Democrats who would like to be the Nominee) but for now I prefer someone else (Al Gore) for the top spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. I really wonder why he hasn't gained more traction....
First off, he's a governor. That alone, historically, means he's electable as President. People forget the only candidate who wasn't a former governor, elected Presidented, in the last almost 50 years is Kennedy. He's got fantastic foreign policy experience too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eggman67 Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think alot of it is the lack of media attention.
He doesn't have the glamour factor of the "Big Three" It's something of a catch-22 on name recognition. The media only covers you if you have it and the only way to get it is to get the media to cover you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC