Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Yoo Slithers In to Defend the White House Subpoena Dodge of Executive Privilege

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 09:00 AM
Original message
John Yoo Slithers In to Defend the White House Subpoena Dodge of Executive Privilege
24 Jul 2007
By Andrew Cohen

Don't Go Away Mad, John -- Just Go Away

The architect of one dangerous Bush administration policy after another -- torture, warrantless domestic surveillance -- now is defending the White House's dubious assertion of executive privilege in the U.S. attorney scandal.

John Yoo, who never dreamed of a presidential power he wasn't willing to turn into an overbearing and arguably illegal policy, writes in today's Wall Street Journal that Republicans should rally around President Bush and help him stave off congressional Democrats' attempts to make former White House counsel Harriet Miers and former White House political director Sara Taylor answer under oath relevant questions about the prosecutor purge.

Among his many other chestnuts, Yoo writes: (http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id... )

"Even if a few Republicans defect, he has the Constitution on his side. His poll numbers may be low, but Congress's are even lower. Congressional Democrats have failed to follow through on the reforms promised in the 2006 campaign. They're too preoccupied with investigating rather than legislating. If the House or Senate vote contempt motions against Ms. Taylor or Ms. Miers, a U.S. Attorney must enforce them, and since they're all Bush appointees, nothing should come of it. The president has every right to order his prosecutors not to bring charges against officials who defend his legitimate constitutional claims."

A few centuries ago, a Yoo-like figure, whose work on behalf of the king had come into disrepute, might have found himself exiled or dead. At a minimum, such a man would have yielded the public stage and gone off into the wilderness somewhere to preach to a few dedicated sycophants.

But this is now. And for unrepetent people like Yoo, there is no reason to hide and no cause for shame. His torture policy leading to Abu Ghraib? No problem. His justification for the National Security Agency's domestic spy program being patently skewed? So what. He is still present, still talking, still offering bad advice about what we ought to think about the rule of law . . .

Historians, I suspect, will not look fondly upon Yoo and the policies he ginned up. As for the rest of us, maybe it's time we used his flawed missives as a barometer for evaluating controversial legal issues: if Yoo is for it, it's a good bet that you want to be against it. And if he's against it, it might not be a bad idea to support it. If he's not going to go into the wilderness, then at least we can allow him to help us see the forest for the trees.


blog: http://blog.washingtonpost.com/benchconference/2007/07/...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zensea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. My "favorite" line from the article
"Without secrecy, the government can't function."

lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Woo is a piece of work
among other things . . .

He says Clinton's assertion of Executive privilege was all about covering an affair, but he ignores the Whitewater Committee and Special Prosecutor which diverted from the original charge to delve into Clinton's personal life. Clinton eventually gave up the documents he had been holding back under his assertion of EP, after Congress voted to send the matter of his refusal to court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Of course they have not followed thru on the promises of the bills
with the republicans blocking and obstructing each bill they want to bring to the floor. How can they. This is a concerted effort to make this congress look bad. They do not care if there is a bill that would directly benefit them, they don't want anything passed. AND if they did manage to pass one bush vetoes it. BUT the MSM never ever prints anything about this or has articles on TV about it. I just wish the democratic congress would find a way to hold the MSM accountable for all the lies they are spewing. There has got to be a way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Sep 18th 2014, 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC