|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 04:52 PM Original message |
Randi has been ripping Ralph Nader a new one most of the afternoon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poiuyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
1. She has been on fire, and making great points too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. THANK YOU RANDI!!!!! People just don't get it. Nader is helping the Republics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 05:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Check out #9...that was supposed to be a reply to this one but I goofed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newsdude (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 10:11 PM Response to Reply #2 |
29. The weak kneed corporate wing of the Democratic Party helps the Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. Good. Nader hasn't done a thing except divide the left... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terip64 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 05:02 PM Response to Original message |
4. I agree with everything she says, as usual... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
5. Yup. Was Just Listening. It Was Fun Hearing Him Exposed As The Selfish Piece Of Shit He Is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
7. I'm loving it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
8. Since Nader is going for it, getting instant run-off voting like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puregonzo1188 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 06:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Exactly, I was wondering since states control ballot access and what not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 07:41 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I think it has to be done at a local or maybe county level, since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
9. But his shit smells like roses to the republic party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronnykmarshall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
10. It was the best birthday present! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Belle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:46 PM Response to Reply #10 |
28. Happy Birthday! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrior1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
14. It was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
15. Nader is Randi's biggest issue at this point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. that's ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:43 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. if you're relying on *that* asshole, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ulysses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. when you're Mr. K, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
17. I've been listening here on the West Coast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. she sure is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:30 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. I wonder whose agent he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
20. think Nadar pretty much said if Hillary runs he will come in and split the vote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 10:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Oh right. I forgot that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lusted4 (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
21. Anyone interested in my opinion of instant runoff voting? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lusted4 (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:09 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Here goes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. why would anyone want to run for second place? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lusted4 (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-06-07 09:38 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I guess your right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC