Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Legal Question if anyone knows about CCTV

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Finbar Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 10:32 PM
Original message
A Legal Question if anyone knows about CCTV
Help legal eagle friends! My former place of employment ( a restaurant ) has decided to do something that I think is illegal. I know this because my former staff has called me to gripe to me. They are still loyal to me. They have put in a camera, one of those little half globe black glass ones, into the bar at the restaurant. They say it is because people are stealing. It supposedly is transmitted to Corporate security and stored there in case it is needed for review.
Herein lies my problem with this. There are no signs posted for employees or customers that say that the location is being monitored by CCTV. I also know this company, and they are way too cheap to spend money like this over a missing bottle of Abslout Peach. So, are they dummy cameras to scare the staff? Or are they real? If they are real.. does anybody know the legality of this? I researched a little bit tonight about the Data Protection Act of 1998, but it is mostly about the employees, not the customers. Any advice would help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. They told YOU, didn't they?
My guess is that they're real, the owners will watch a little while and then they'll be used for their stated purpose, in case the till is short or the liquor's being used up a lot faster than profits would indicate.

A lot of businesses have cameras. Few of them have signs posted. Anybody who doesn't assume he's being filmed at all times is naive.

Those things saved me the price of a video tape once. The manager and I reviewed the tape together at the time I supposedly checked out something I'd have to have taken leave of my senses to watch and it turned out to be a couple of thugs with a faked card. The same camera in the same store helped nail other thugs after robberies twice.

So they're not all bad. Just don't pick your nose in public. It could be saved for posterity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finbar Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But there are no monitors on site to review the tapes.
And we are talking about a huge national chain here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reminds Me Of A Similar Situation...
Several years ago, I knew of some employees at a radio station who were vidoed bad mouthing one of the "stars"...the camera was hidden and so was the mike. They were fired and tried to sue for entrapment. The court ruled against these people saying that the conditions of the employ allowed the company to mount any camera or mike in their business...or monitor your phone calls or your web surfing. Since tbe discussion these people were having was considered "insubordination", it was used as grounds for firing and it held.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think it depends on state, however, generally a sign is posted at the enterance...
Something like "This premises is monitored by Closed Circuit Cameras". In any event, it is legal for businesses to monitor their own premises with the exceptions of bathrooms or any areas where the people undress, such as public showers in gyms, dressing rooms in malls and stores, etc. Some states have stricter laws when it comes to audio recordings, in other words, visual is OK in some instances, audio is not. Also some have varying laws in regards to informing customers or employees. You said it was a globe, I imagine that the camera is more of a deterrence rather than actual surveillance, otherwise it would be less obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 23rd 2014, 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC