Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So Wasnt Bill and Hills Issue Also......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:26 PM
Original message
So Wasnt Bill and Hills Issue Also......


....A Private Matter..........same situation......1. Husband wants some excitement.....Husband get Pleasure....3.Husband Gets Caught..4 Husband tell a lie..Oh!!!!....but Vitter cant be impeached I forgot.....


I demand an apology for the Vitter's making Bill and Hills issue PUBLIC.......Call his office tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, Monica wasn't a hooker...
and Bill is a Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Ding ding we have a winner n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course it was a private matter. There was no payment for sex so
no laws were violated.

The entire world was aghast that the Repuglicans brought impeachment against the best president America had in a century. They knew it was a private matter, something that many men do and have done for time eternal.

President Clinton should have said it was a private matter and refused to answer any and all questions.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I agree......
President Clinton's mistake was answering any questions. It was a private matter and had nothing to do with his ability as president. His answer to any questions should have been "no comment".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. President Clinton was told it would be in contempt if he did
not answer the questions. Unlike the ones who refuse to answer congress's questions today...he was a democrat and the republicans hold them to different standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bill's a Democrat though
so that made going after him and exposing his family to ridicule OK. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. He demanded Bill step down like Livingston for consensual sex
Now he gets to break the law by patronizing prostitutes and demand it remain, "a private issue."

There's no hypocrisy quite so redolent with alleged victimhood as Republican hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. question
Q: What do you call 99 Republicans and one Democrat caught in a whorehouse?

A: A bipartisan sex scandal

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. Mr. and Mrs. Vitter lost the "right" to demand privacy when they both
were quite vocal in their PUBLIC discussion of a private affair, Mr. Vitter calling for Clinton's resignation and Mrs. Vitter making fun of Hillary Clinton's response to her husband's infidelity.

I sure didn't hear Mrs. Vitter apologize to Mrs. Clinton for her previous PUBLIC statements, did anyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-16-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Nope. She sure didn't. Ugly, Mrs. Vitter.
She vehemently dissed Hill and implicitly Chelsea in 1998, so her hubby could climb to power. Now the remedies for marital indiscretion she supported are allegedly moot. The price her children have to pay vs. the price Chelsea had to pay are not even in the same ballpark. Suck it up, Wendy, you hypocrite. Your hubby is a laughingstock and you are a pathetic loser.

I leave your kids out of it because I'm human.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 23rd 2014, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC