Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For those with the stomach, a Freeper thread on Vitter.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:21 AM
Original message
For those with the stomach, a Freeper thread on Vitter.
The hypocrisy is astounding. Clinton's disgusting, Vitter, oh that's old news, nothing to see.

And don't complain about freeper thread posted here. It was in the title, you could have ignored it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1865242/posts

Some choice comments:

The real question is, did he receive oral sex in the oval office, causing him to miss taking out OBL?

2 posted on 07/13/2007 5:02:19 AM EDT by rawcatslyentist (The liberty we prize is not Americas gift to the world, it is Gods gift to humanity.GWB-03)

Absolutely.

I knew when this paltry Palfrey bitch decided to release the names of her clients, that the majority of them would be Republicans. She would, naturally, have to be a Democrat. Republican women arent that cheap.

3 posted on 07/13/2007 5:12:16 AM EDT by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")

Senator Vitter take a deep breath and then say this too will pass. It will.

4 posted on 07/13/2007 5:13:10 AM EDT by shrinkermd

I smell a Comrade Klinton floating around in all the other fecal matter called the Democrat Cesspool election committee.

Liberals are nothing.

Nothing = a turd with all the sh!t scraped off.

7 posted on 07/13/2007 5:53:07 AM EDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)

**That guy seems to have a fixation, eh?**

I can tell you what I'm going to do, and I'm a Louisiana voter. I'm going to vote for David Vitter's re-election in 2010. This entire mess is a recycling of old news from the Drive-By Media. Look for blowback on the Drive-Bys starting next week, particularly Gannett reporter John Hill. He's one of the ringleaders.

19 posted on 07/13/2007 6:45:09 AM EDT by abb (The Dinosaur Media: A One-Way Medium in a Two-Way World)

He still has our familys support and I emailed him and told him just that. I recommended that he hunker down and ride this out. A few other choice words about that dim, McHale.

20 posted on 07/13/2007 6:45:37 AM EDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)

Well all vote for him again as well.

22 posted on 07/13/2007 6:47:21 AM EDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)

I won't throw the baby out with the bath water. He's a good man and works hard for us. Unless they find a dead underage boy in his bed, I'll keep voting for him every time he's up for reelection.

When I want a perfect man, I'll turn to Jesus.

28 posted on 07/13/2007 6:54:52 AM EDT by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)

its in the past and hes received forgiveness. End of story.

33 posted on 07/13/2007 7:20:45 AM EDT by balch3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. 'Republican women aren't that cheap' - BUT THE MEN ARE! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. I don't get that comment....Palfrey must be a Dem because Republican women aren't that cheap?
What the hell does that mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. "Republican women arent that cheap."
It means that the typical GOP dude can't even buy sex from his own wife. That's how up tight and sexually repressed they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #25
37. I don't really know either, other than inferring Paltrey is cheap/cheezy for
releasing her list-?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. That was all I could come up with
the implication that if Palfrey was a Republican-leaning madam she wouldn't give up the list as easily.

Still doesn't make sense though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. They are very forgiving of their own, aren't they?
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. He missed UBL because he was getting BLOWN?
Jesus...how long did it take to make him splooge? If you experience an erection lasting longer than four hours, consult your physician. I've never heard of a hummer lasting eight years.

Although, Bush has been fucking us in the ass for over six years, so I guess anything is possible.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. no shit
If you miss out on catching a terrorist for a blow job that must have been one helluva blow job. It wasn't like he was on vacation or something missing terrorist threats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Interesting angle, huh?
Bush was handed an actual written memo warning of an impending attack, and then went on vacation and we were attacked.

But Clinton got a five minute hummer and that caused him to miss capturing UBL.

The Freeper mind is a dark, scary place.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I guess it is
Now, I have to wonder, I suppose if Bush and Pickles have sex does that mean he is neglecting his duty too? I mean, if they want to be harsh on a guy for a hummer, then I think president's shouldn't have sex at all for fear of missing out on catching a terrorist.

How weird. You know, if they want to legitimately criticize Clinton, that's cool, I've done it myself, but this stuff is just sheer hatred for the sake of sheer hatred. It's nonsensical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. "You misunderestimate me. Smirk, smirk, smirk.." - Commander AWOL
Edited on Fri Jul-13-07 11:21 AM by SpiralHawk
"With the help of my evil troll Turd Blossom, and my Skull & Boner occult powers, I am easily able to manipulate the thoughts of weak-minded people such as the Freepers. Hell, they think I am a freakin military hero, and that I actually DID something on 9/11 rather than sit on my ass staring into space while reading a kindegarten book. Bwaa ha ha ha. Smirk, smirk, smirk."

- Commander AWOL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. I Guess "Wag The Dog" Is Some Kinda Priapism-Inducing Technique
I mean, that HAS to be the reason the cons were yelling that phrase back then - because they were outraged that the blowjobs were getting in the way of bombing Bin Laden, right? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Maybe they thought it was a sex position
That would explain a lot about Rick Santorum, come to think of it.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
31. Wag the box turtle.
lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. SOP for blaming 9/11 on Clinton (or "Klintoon" in their parlance)
I've been reading this line of "reasoning" from RW stooges for years. A man who could probably dictate obscure policy papers in his sleep, somehow was "distracted" from fightin Terra on account of a BJ.

I don't think even the Freepers really believe it, but they go right on saying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
30. More talk about Bill Clinton's amazing magical all-power penis.
The blow job that lasted eight years!

The Republicans are insanely jealous of Bill Clinton and the prowess of his penis. That's why they can't stop talking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. Eight years?
To a publicon, it's still going on. How else could the Clenis be such a smooooth talker when he's behind a podium?
Answer: there must be somebody in the podium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. They must be out of their minds with jealousy. It explains everything.
Every moment of the Republicans' lives are preoccupied with the obvious fact that Bill Clinton is getting some, and they're not. Unless they pay for it, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
45. YEAH!!!
With NO grease at that!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Real Christians aren't they?
And amazing how they manage to blame the Clintons in once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Misogynist Freepers. who'd have guessed(!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. Ah ha!
I see that dead, underage boys in the bed are the key. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't mind a freeper thread if you copy and paste
the content.

What I will not do - and hope that others won't either - is click on the link to generate more "hits" for them. The same for Drudge or Fox.

I am grateful for the scouts who venture into these hostile territories to report back, and coping and pasting can prevent us from clicking on the links.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. Those people are deplorable...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. Jesus, I just diminished my own worth by reading through that thread.
What fools these morans be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minimus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
10. "Unless they find a dead underage boy in his bed ..."

So now we know what it takes to make repubs. lose their support. They are sick!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
42. Even then, they would just say, "At least it was only ONE dead underage boy and there is no way to
say for sure how and why he was in the Senator's bed....."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
14. "its in the past and hes received forgiveness."
According to... Vitter.

So "balch3" is going to believe Vitter when Vitter says "It's in the past" and when he says "he's received forgiveness" about an embarassing sex escapade involving... Vitter...

Funny how that same believability standard isn't applied to, say, Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
19. I suppose it wouldn't be prudent to suggest to them
that they ought to think about the one thing they are totally committed to--what do they suppose republican women are doing while their men are off, dallying?

That is guaranteed to drive them drooling. Women are sexual beings, too. Perhaps those republican women are smarter about not getting caught or are naturally a little more discreet.

There is a fundamental qualification for becoming a republican that few democrats can muster - the ability to hold two mutually exclusive threads of being in mind at the same time and believe intensely in both.
The compartmentalized thinking that is required is beyond most democrats. We see it as hypocrisy and view hypocrisy as one of the vilest sins imaginable.

Democrats are "gifted" with an obsession for "dispassionate intellectualism," and it infuriates pukes.
Republicans are "gifted" with "compartmentalization," and we view the resulting hypocrisy with horror and disgust.

It's fascinating, like watching a snake preparing to strike, in a morbid, creepy sort of way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Wow, this is a GREAT quote! Thanks.
It sums it all up so succintly...

Democrats are "gifted" with an obsession for "dispassionate intellectualism," and it infuriates .
Republicans are "gifted" with "compartmentalization," and we view the resulting hypocrisy with horror and disgust.


.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Republican women are asexual beings. Meaning they would rather use a rubber glove and a turkey
baster to concieve good republican off spring without having to see a republican male nude or enjoying himself. Which is why republican males either buy sex, go to gay sex or go after underage people who are easy to fool into believing trickle down doesn't mean someone pissing on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. My brother is a hard-core republican.
Although he is like most of them, and now claims he never really like Bush. Still, he's very wealthy, and very republican. But his lovely wife is even moreso. She's a FOX News junkie. She is afraid of her own shadow, because terrorists might be lurking in it. Her kids aren't allowed out of her sight because those evil liberal child molesters will snatch them. She's a mess.

But she's very pretty.

And she and my brother have an unspoken "agreement." He's got the money, so when he's on the road if gets some on the outside it's better for her because that means she doesn't have to deal with the messy bits. He gets his rocks off, and she gets the 4000 sf home and the Bimmer and the AMEX card which he pays every month. She doesn't work, yet they still have a housekeeper and nanny.

Republicans are big into symbiotic relationships, it appears.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. That's really sad.
My overwhelming reaction to your brother's and sister-in-law's lives is sadness for them.

As far as we know, we only have one life on this earth. What a sorrow to waste it collecting material things while missing out on having a truly loving, respectful, connected relationship.

When all is said and done, what do we have in life? I would hate to end my life looking around at a bunch of Pottery Barn stuff and wondering what it would have been like to have a loving relationship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. Me too.
We used to be pretty close, but he's a republican to the core and I finally realized that if it weren't for our shared blood, I'd never give the guy the time of day. Finally he pulled some shit related to our late father's business which is too complex and painful to get into here, and that was really the last I spoke with him. We went from getting together weekly (he's three hours away in New Hampshire...it was always me and my family who had to travel to visit him, never the other way around) to now only seeing each other at funerals and weddings. Almost ten years now since we've spoken. And I'm quite happy with that. He is as republican as they get, and obsessed with "things." To the point that he's perfectly happy supporting a trophy wife as long as they both have all their stuff.

Who am I to judge if that what's works for them? My own lifestyle isn't exactly "conventional." But I've never strayed outside my marriage in 25 years. Not once. He does with a wink-wink nudge-nudge, saying "Hey, I bought her a big house and an expensive car...I deserve a little fun, too." What one has to do with the other I'll never understand...because I'm not a shallow, self-obsessed Repubican.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #34
43. Like you, I am highly unconventional.
I know that it is foolish to point fingers and compare people - my own life is far from perfect. There's a common thread in many Republican marriages, though. You described it perfectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. If you were drawn or "thrown" to be a republicon, the
thought would never occur to you. I think, for most recons, a loving, generous relationship doesn't compute beyond saying the words.
It may be that love equates to possessiveness, jealousy and a victim act enclosed within overweening protectiveness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
51. Very easy to profile a republican, its all about them end of story.
There are no loving relationships, except for self love. Wives, kids, morals, humanity, does not happen in the republicans world, its either my way or screw you, I'll find someone just s shallow as I am. Trophy wives, hookers or gay sex, no big deal, after all they want it and thats all the reasoning they need for any actions they take. They even built protections and justifications into what they do without it bothering their moral views, after all its not their morals at fault or in danger, its someone elses that they deem worse. It also allows them to believe one thing and then go against their beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bumblebee1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #26
49. Is she a member of Concerned Women of America?
Those women act like they are afraid of their own shadows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchleary Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
20. Ya know
I cannot believe it but I have lost even more respect for them. They will compromise everything for their own. The hypocrisy reaks. I used to be very conservative and these guys give conservatives a bad name. One of the reasons i despise all that is because of people like those. They are opportunists. They like to say they love god and jesus but in truth, only as it servers their twisted needs. It is in times like this I wish there was a rapture so i could see the look of smugness erode from their faces as they are the ones left behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. They can't help it.
That's the way their brains are put together. Most of us can't qualify to be republican-that's how we ended up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #20
27. For a bunch of people that claim to be for bringing a moral foundation back to America
they sure seem willing to bend over backwards to support politicians that go against that moral standard as long as there's an "R" next to the name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
28. "I won't throw the baby out with the bath water."
Interesting choice of phrase, considering that Vitter liked to wear diapers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
32. This pretty much sums up the freeper mindset
It's OK for Vitter to do what he did, because he's a conservative Republican. Clinton is automatically guilty because he's a Democrat.

That's it. That's all of it. that's the entire rationale behind all freepers. If Bush came to their house and performed the Aristocrats joke in their living room live, including raping their children with the barrel of a shotgun and cutting their arms off with a chainsaw, it would be OK, because he's Republican. But if Clinton brings about world peace, triples life expectancy and makes everyone a billionaire, any good that comes about must be bad because Clinton is a Democrat and therefore there must be something wrong with how good it is.

Freepers need to be beaten to death with ferrets. They're holding back the rest of the human race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. I suppose that's the source of the whatever-you-call-it
internet shorthand "IOKIYAR." It's ok if you're a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
33. Need to Copy These Comments and Save Them Somewhere
Because you gotta figure, in a couple of years, we can expect it to swing back to Democratic sex scandals, and when that happens, it would be a good thing to have hard evidence of how shallow and manufactured their inevitable outrage will be.

Also, it is good to have this visible; Missy Coulter makes a point of saying how Liberals seem to think hypocrisy is some great crime when it's really nothing - well, darling, there's your corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
38. Difference with Clinton - he doesn't have to pay
:evilgrin:


Clinton wasn't preaching shit to the others either - there's a point they love to miss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #38
56. Actually he did preach on one occation
He signed DOMA into law. It may have been triangulation or some other DLC shit, but it was the fundy's baby that he signed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
41. Little sad sacks are so delusional. And that's about the nicest
thing I can think to say about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
44. Pretty paltry number of FReeps defending the guy
Only 49 posts at this point. The others probably realize that it's not the sex but the hypocrisy that's causing him problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
47. Looks like business as usual over there..
If it is a Republican, then they will bend over backwards to excuse the person's behavior. It never fails.

And there is no evil liberal tinfoil conspiracy. Vitter quite literally fucked himself over and it was only a matter of time before it got out. Hell rumors of his infidelity have been floating around for years.

Normally I wouldn't care about a person's private life, but when you make your private life part of your job, don't complain, whine, or hide when you are outed as a hypocrite. Especially when you use your private life as a club to deny rights to people who believe and live differently than yourself.

If this had been a Democratic senator, all holy hell would have been raised on Free Republic if the person missed important votes and business due to his/her personal life. Vitter's missed a lot this week due to his hiding out, but lucky for him his supporters are fellow hypocrites.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rob H. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
48. "its in the past and hes received forgiveness."
Meanwhile they still blame Clinton for everything that Bush has utterly fubared even though Bill's been out of office for 6+ years. Behold the awe-inspiring power of The Mighty Clenis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
52. "I won't throw the baby out with the bath water." - Interesting choice of words.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
53. They must have gotten their faxed talking points.. yesterday they avoided it like the plague
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Yes, they were frozen with indecision until told to....blame it all on Clinton!
What a novel idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
55. i keep imagining someone at freeptown banging a gavel and saying
''gentlemen, gentlemen -- oh and that broad over there -- i'm opening the session for our weekly idiots annonymous meeting --

first order of business the minutes from the last meeting: bill clinton's penis, bill clinton's dick, bill clinton's cock, -- then we moved on to bill clinton's blow job, and bill clinton's blow job{how does he get them to do that?} -- then billary is a lesbian, hillary is gay and hillary won't put out so bill play can play around.

and then last -- sen vitter -- and apparently someone suggested that really it was bill clinton's dick that went to the prostitute and not sen vitter -- a good christian man -- and this person produced a fox news frame that said this was indeed so.''
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
57. This entire mess is a recycling of old news from the Drive-By Media.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Unlike talking about Clinton...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Oct 22nd 2014, 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC