Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I must have dreamt that Meiers was voted to be in contempt today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 03:33 PM
Original message
I must have dreamt that Meiers was voted to be in contempt today
Edited on Thu Jul-12-07 03:34 PM by SaveAmerica
because there is not a word on www.msnbc.com about it. Rove's re-run of the Bush surprise press conference got the results they wanted, that's the only news about the Bush admin on the front page. The only good news is this hilarious Church Lady picture they have of him:



Could it be Satan Satan Satan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Surprisingly, CNN has it way down the page at their Politics section,
at least it's there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cureautismnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, but it's way down below this important news...
"Food vendor's buns are made of cardboard." :crazy:

Priorities, priorities...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Was not a dream,
it happened but we can't waste valuable air time on political stunts like that, we have to focus on those Al-Qaeda guys hiding under every Bu$h and how well the economy is doing and let's not forget those low un-employment rates. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Actually, I don't think that they did vote to hold her in contempt...yet
They voted to uphold the ruling of the chair that the invocation of executive privilege was not proper. But I think that they still have to bring up a separate motion to hold Meiers in contempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. you must've
because she wasn't voted to be in contempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-12-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. I believe the matter went to
a Judiciary subcommittee. Next to the full committee. Then to the full Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Oct 25th 2014, 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC