Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Numbers affliated with both major political parties decline

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AnOhioan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:48 PM
Original message
Numbers affliated with both major political parties decline
Number of Republicans in U.S. Hits New Low, Number of Democrats Also Decline

For the fourth straight month, the number of people identifying themselves as Republicans has decreased. For the third straight month, the number of people identifying themselves as Democrats has also decreased.

A Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of 15,000 adults in May found that just 30.8% now say they're Republicans. That's down slightly from last month and down more than six percentage points from the GOP peak of 37.3% during Election 2004. The number of Republicans has been falling fairly steadily since the middle of 2005.

However, the survey also found that the number of people identifying themselves as Democrats has fallen to its lowest level in seventeen months (since January 2006). Democrats gained about two percentage points of support during 2006 and peaked at 38.0% in December of last year. Since actually taking control of Congress, Democrats have given back most of those gains. Today, 36.3% say they belong to Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record)'s party.



More at http://news.yahoo.com/s/rasmussen/20070601/pl_rasmussen/partyaffiliation20070601

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a wake up call the the Democrats in Congress..........
why aren't YOU listening to the voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The problem is that they read this a needing to be more like Bush :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How very true
they think they need to move more to that unknown middle. They don't want to see what the problem really is and it isn't moving toward the Leiberman model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. They read this as a need to move more to the (I) side; BOTH the............
Democrats and the rethugs have failed their constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. Food for thought

Politics is dominated by two political parties. Do those two parties reflect the population accurately, represent their interests effectively? In other words, are 45% of the people represented by one of the two parties, and 45% represented by the other, and then never mind the 10%?

I think not. If not, what percentage of the population IS represented by the two parties do you think?

Are elected officials the power in the country? Could they be?

To get elected to office, is not approval by the national media, approval by corporate money people, and approval by party hierarchy required?

How can this accurately be called "democracy?"

Is the entire possible range of political ideas and programs available as "choices" for the electorate?

I think not. I think a very narrow range of ideas and programs is available, even to discuss or consider let alone "choose."

Since support of corporate money people, national media, and party hierarchy are required to be considered let alone elected to public office, is it not reasonable to assume that those people define the range of permissible ideas and programs?

Within the range of permissible political ideas, are the best interests of the majority of the people included? Is there any overlap at all?

I think not.

Is it in any way possible to work with the national media, or within the party, or within corporations to change this so that the people's interests are represented?

I think not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Nancy Pelosi's party?
I didn;t know any one person owned a party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-02-07 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. We can do better than this

Researchers asked staunch party members from both sides to evaluate information that threatened their preferred candidate prior to the 2004 Presidential election. The subjects' brains were monitored while they pondered.

(snip)

The brain imaging revealed a consistent pattern. Both Republicans and Democrats consistently denied obvious contradictions for their own candidate but detected contradictions in the opposing candidate.

http://www.livescience.com/strangenews/060124_political_decisions.html

And that's just the rank & file. The people calling the shots don't have this problem, they are very clear on what they want, and if that's what you want it's purely coincidental.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-03-07 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. how come you have a 0 post count?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC