Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Land of the Czars" Rachel Maddow on the History and Myths

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 04:57 AM
Original message
"Land of the Czars" Rachel Maddow on the History and Myths
 
Run time: 03:29
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sIJlUMqweI
 
Posted on YouTube: September 09, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: October 08, 2009
By DU Member: democracy1st
Views on DU: 755
 
Rachel Maddow takes a deep look into the title of Czar. Its history and it's myths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. In which case, "Never mind" . . . very nicely done. n/t
Edited on Thu Oct-08-09 05:11 AM by MrModerate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ineeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. See this , snipped from Factcheck entry last month:
"Czar" is a label bestowed by the media and sometimes the administration as a shorthand for the often-cumbersome titles of various presidential advisers, assistants, office directors, special envoys and deputy secretaries. (After all, what makes for a better headline "weapons czar" or "undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics"?) Fox News host Glenn Beck has identified 32 Obama czars on his Web site, whom he has characterized as a collective "iceberg" threatening to capsize the Constitution. The habit of using "czar" to refer to an administration official dates back at least to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, but the real heyday of the czar came during President George W. Bushs administration. In fact, of the 32 czars Beck lists:

* Nine were confirmed by the Senate, including the director of national intelligence ("intelligence czar"), the chief performance officer ("government performance czar") and the deputy interior secretary ("California water czar").
* Eight more were not appointed by the president the special advisor to the EPA overseeing its Great Lakes restoration plan ("Great Lakes czar") is EPA-appointed, for instance, and the assistant secretary for international affairs and special representative for border affairs ("border czar") is appointed by the secretary of homeland security.
* Fifteen of the "czarships" Beck lists, including seven that are in neither of the above categories, were created by previous administrations. (In some cases, as with the "economic czar," the actual title in this case, chairman of the presidents economic recovery advisory board is new, but there has been an official overseeing the area in past administrations. In others, as with the special envoy to Sudan, the position is old but the "czar" appellation is new.)
* In all, of the 32 positions in Becks list, only eight are Obama-appointed, unconfirmed, brand new czars. These new "czars" include the special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan; the director of recovery for auto communities and workers; the senior advisor for the presidents Automotive Task Force; the special adviser for green jobs, enterprise, and innovation at the White House Council on Environmental Quality; the federal chief information officer; the chair of the Recovery Act Transparency and Accountability Board; the White House director of urban affairs; and the White House coordinator for weapons of mass destruction, security and arms control. Or, as Glenn Beck would have it, the Afghanistan czar, the auto recovery czar, the car czar, the embattled green jobs czar, the information czar, the stimulus accountability czar, the urban affairs czar and the WMD policy czar.
Another thing: Beck counts among his 32 "czars" three who have not been called "czars" by reporters at all, except in stories claiming that the Obama administration has lots of "czars."
Like the Obama czars, the Bush czars held entirely prosaic administrative positions: special envoys, advisers, office heads, directors, secretaries. The preponderance of czars earned both ridicule and concern in editorials and in media, but no objections from Congress.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Tell this to Feingold, Beck, and now Lieberman. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Did you ever think that
Russ Feingold's intent in bringing this before his committee is to hang the pukes with it? They created far more of these positions than the Democrats ever have. Wouldn't holding a hearing about them, pointing that out and providing the opportunity to clearly establish that these are simply policy advisers put the subject to rest for good in a very public and shameful way?

When kids throw a tantrum over a toy, the best response is to take the toy a way. That's exactly what Feingold's action in committee will do. What will puke legislators, Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh and the teabaggers all do once the myths they prop up about czars are thoroughly debunked?

Feingold has never been a tool. That anyone on DU can think that's the case continues to surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thank you. I just posted a thread about this in GP-P but I think you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Feingold had the 'thoughtful review" that the WH said it welcomed.........



http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/09/18/czar-wars /

................Asked the administrations view of a possible Senate hearing on the topic and the concerns that have been raised, Ms. Dunn said on Friday: We are having constructive conversations with Senator Feingold to address his concerns and welcome a thoughtful examination of this issue. A careful review of the facts would dispel the misinformation being broadcast by those who take their marching orders from Glenn Beck and Fox News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I love how people decide to interpret things from a post that doesn't suggest anything of the sort.
Edited on Thu Oct-08-09 12:03 PM by vaberella
If you're wondering why I mentioned Feingold amongst the other two, it's because all three are the ones really pushing this thing and making it an issue. Feingold is helping legitimize the claim, when in essence it's bloody crap. Added to that, Feingold, as some have said, did the same to Bush...so what you're telling me is that Feingold's intention was to defend Bush against such attacks as well? When Bush faced no such similar attack. I find your defense weak.

My only intention is to point out that all three are pushing a meme. You rationalized Feingold's position but intentionally ignored the other two...which makes me wonder why. You could easily have used the defense for the other two as well.

But believe what you want. I'm not about to put anyone on any pedestal over silliness.


Edited for grammar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Feingold's position has always been in support of sunshine
In this case, it works to Obama's advantage. In the chimp's case, it worked against his secretive administration when the Dems could manage it.

Of course I can have it both ways.

To assume there is something innately wrong with questioning anything a Dem administration does is short-sighted and debilitating not only to progress but to defense of that administration. Barack Obama ran for the presidency demanding more sunlight on government activities. To expect progressive Dems like Russ Feingold won't take him up on it is just silly. To think Obama didn't mean it is "silliness" as you say.

You are welcome to think that there wasn't method to the apparent "meme-pushing" madness you imagine Sen. Feingold has engaged in.

I'll continue to assert you're ignoring the big picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Oct 01st 2014, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC