Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2007

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 12:40 AM
Original message
Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2007
 
Run time: 12:48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtgZnVwcVPY
 
Posted on YouTube: March 01, 2007
By YouTube Member: NancyPelosi
Views on YouTube: 1015
 
Posted on DU: March 03, 2007
By DU Member: Pryderi
Views on DU: 583
 
Thank you Nancy Pelosi for posting this video!

Under the Presidential Records Act, presidential records are supposed to be released to historians and the public 12 years after the end of a presidential administration. In November 2001, President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13233 which overturned an executive order issued by President Reagan and gave current and former presidents and vice presidents broad authority to withhold presidential records or delay their release indefinitely. The Presidential Records Act Amendments of 2007 would nullify the Bush executive order and establish procedures to ensure the timely release of presidential records -- this hearing examines the issues involved. Here Rep. Lacy Clay asks historians about their feelings on President Bush's executive order.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtgZnVwcVPY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let's hear it for historians!
Almost as dangerous as scientists!

:applause::applause::applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scholarsOrAcademics Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-03-07 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Presidential privilege
the lawyers comment that Presidential privilege does not transfer to designated representative,who has the power to act capriciously, is worth a second thought.
it is difficult to act responsibly,when it is ones grandchildren who are required to be informed citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC