Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fresno, CA.. SEIU needs help to organize Hospital.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
annm4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 10:02 PM
Original message
Fresno, CA.. SEIU needs help to organize Hospital.
Community Hospital Workers Want Free & Fair Elections
By Mike Rhodes

A long anticipated report from the Fresno Fair Election Commission was made public on March 13. The commission made recommendations based on investigations over the last six months of the union organizing drive and election process at Community Hospital. Employees at the hospital are organizing and gathering signatures of co-workers in an effort to get the Service Employee International Union - United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW) to represent them.

The Fresno Fair Election Commission found that the process leading to a union election at Community Hospital is not going well. The following information is taken directly from their report. Here is what they discovered: Finding number one is that beginning in late August 2007, Community Hospital employees were frequently called away from their patient care duties for mandatory company meetings, at which management discouraged workers from supporting unionization. At one meeting, employees were warned they would lose evaluation points if they missed management’s “labor education” meetings. Workers were told they would be written up for failing to attend these mandatory anti-union meetings.

Lydia Martinez, a licensed vocational nurse at the Children’s Health Center, was ordered by her boss to attend a mandatory “labor education” meeting in September – despite having a patient with a knee laceration in need of immediate care. “They can pull us off the floor and make
us go to meetings, and we have no choice in the matter.”

Finding number two: Despite clear laws against such practices, Community Hospital management has, according to numerous employees, engaged in aggressive intimidation tactics to discourage union organizing efforts. Hospital managers have photographed and otherwise
monitored pro-union employees, threatened sanctions against staff who fail to attend mandatory anti-union meetings, and unlawfully ordered workers not to hand out union information fliers.

In several documented cases, Community Hospital senior managers and security guards have threatened workers with arrest for distributing union fliers, despite constitutional rights protecting such activity. Meanwhile, management has widely disseminated anti-union materials, including fliers and e-mails, during work hours. Employees also note a pattern of harassment, in which managers have spread disparaging rumors about pro-union employees and abruptly changed pro-union workers’ schedules despite knowing they had doctors appointments and other conflicting commitments.

According to the report, management has created an atmosphere of anti-union intimidation, regardless of the workers’ legally protected rights to discuss and support unionization.

In a subtler form of intimidation, Community Hospital managers have repeatedly interrogated employees about their sentiments regarding unionization. This tactic has included trick questions to determine an employee’s opinion about the union; offers to help staff remove themselves from union petitions; and questions to staff about their pro-union sentiments. In a number of cases, managers asked workers directly if they had signed the union petition and told employees they were keeping a list of staff who signed. Supervisors also repeatedly probed workers to find out who was signing or distributing petitions.

Finding number four by the Fresno Fair Election Commission reveled that supervisors restricted employees’ freedom of speech. The First Amendment extends to the workplace, where workers have the legally protected right to discuss union matters. Nonetheless, numerous Community Hospital management personnel have ordered employees to refrain from talking about the union at work, even as they require staff to attend mandatory meetings opposing unionization during work hours. While management has widely disseminated anti-union fliers and other materials, supervisors have removed pro-union leaflets from the worksite, and explicitly prohibited employees from sharing union information with co-workers.

Although employees are regularly free to discuss sports, news, and other matters throughout the workday without such speech being stifled, they have been prohibited from speaking about union issues while working. Hospital staff says this has created an environment of hypocrisy, in which all pro-union speech is prohibited, while management commonly uses workers’ on the job time to disseminate anti-union messages.

For example, Mary Lou Martinez, a Community Hospital patient care assistant, witnessed her supervisor removing a union flier from the break room bulletin board, and declaring that no pro-union materials could be posted. Meanwhile, Martinez saw stacks of anti-union fliers throughout the break room area. “So they can put anti-union materials everywhere, but we can’t put pro-union materials anywhere.”

Letty Mendoza, a sterile processing technician at Community Hospital, was called into her manager’s office and instructed not to discuss union issues while working. She said “I feel like they’re trying to silence me, like my freedom of speech is being taken away.”

Finding #5 - Supervisors used fear as a tactic. In addition to intimidation, managers at Community Hospital have consistently used fear tactics to discourage workers from supporting
the union. Supervisors have falsely warned employees they will lose their jobs and their homes if the union wins the election. Staff were also threatened that they could be fired for signing union petitions, and told that the union wanted their phone numbers and addresses so it could intimidate them into joining. Due to this campaign of fear and misinformation, many workers have expressed concern that they will be fired for supporting the union.

During numerous mandatory meetings, management has intensified workers’ fears, claiming that employees would not receive raises if they signed a union petition, and could be replaced if there was a strike. In one case, a top hospital official stoked fears that organizers would stalk employees – further creating an intimidating atmosphere of fear and confusion that hindered workers’ right to organize and express their views.

Latisha Jones, who is a medical records clerk at Community Regional Medical Center, said that
“On October 4, at about 6:45 a.m., I went with some co-workers to the back entrance of
Community Regional and began handing out union newsletters to co-workers who passed
by. At around 7 a.m., a few security guards appeared and began telling us that we were not
allowed to be handing out fliers. We, along with union organizers, explained that we had
the legal right to be there as long as we were not blocking any entrance or exit or disturbing
patients. The security guards insisted we leave and informed us that, if we did not, they
would call the police and press charges against us. I was scared and angry. I felt like I was
being treated like some kind of a criminal at my own hospital. I was exercising my right to
distribute information to my co-workers and they were harassing us! It’s not right. They had
five security guards there to watch two of us handing out fliers.”

The Fresno Fair Election Commission report also says that Community Hospital administration presented misleading and distorted information to employees. As part of its overall campaign to undermine workers’ union organizing, Community Hospital management has consistently used misinformation to give employees a false and negative impression of the union. Workers report being barraged on a daily basis by anti-union messages, lies, and distortions aimed at discouraging unionization.
see more here; http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/03/20/18487352.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC