Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1st Circuit Issues First Ruling to Uphold Authority of Vacancy-Riddled NLRB

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 08:04 PM
Original message
1st Circuit Issues First Ruling to Uphold Authority of Vacancy-Riddled NLRB

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202429146644&st_Circuit_Issues_First_Ruling_to_Uphold_Authority_of_VacancyRiddled_NLRB

Marcia Coyle
The National Law Journal
March 18, 2009

With numerous challenges waiting in the wings, the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has issued the first ruling to uphold the authority of a vacancy-riddled National Labor Relations Board to make decisions by only two of its five members.

An estimated 60 to 70 challenges have been filed to two-member board decisions. One challenge recently was argued and is pending decision in the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. That circuit has put other challenges on hold pending its decision in Laurel Baye Healthcare v. NLRB, nos. 08-1162; 08-1214.

The NLRB, when fully constituted, has five members. In December 2007, a four-member NLRB, anticipating the imminent decrease in its membership to just two members because of term expirations, announced that it was delegating its powers to three members. That action, it said, would permit two members, as a quorum of the three-member group, to issue decisions and orders in unfair labor practice and representation cases. The three-member group no longer existed after the expiration of one member's term in January 2008.

Nearly all of the board's 300 decisions in 2008 were made by two members.

In the 1st Circuit ruling, a three-judge panel unanimously held that the delegation of authority by the board was lawful under the "plain text" of section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act. Northeastern Land Services v. National Labor Relations Board, No. 08-1878 (1st Cir.).

NLS had appealed a two-member board decision holding that the company had violated Section 8 of the National Labor Relations Act by maintaining an overbroad confidentiality provision and by discharging an employee for violating it.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-22-09 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do ALL members of the NLRB need to be confirmed? . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC