Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Patrick Fitzgerald Revealing Shady Administration Practices

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 10:15 AM
Original message
Patrick Fitzgerald Revealing Shady Administration Practices
Edited on Fri Apr-21-06 10:18 AM by cat_girl25
Here is a good article on Pat Fitzgerald's actions...

Fitzgerald revealing shady administration practices
by Linda P. Campbell, Columnist
Friday, April 21, 2006

(KRT)—Patrick Fitzgerald is my hero. Not because he’s pursuing Vice President Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff or because he’s making the White House squirm over its distinction between good and bad leaking of government secrets. It’s because Fitzgerald is forcing this administration to confront its shadowy conniving. And he’s doing it out in public, without leaks or whispers, by simply doing his job in pursuing a criminal case.

That’s not to suggest that Fitzgerald doesn’t understand exactly what he’s putting out for public consumption. But he’s laying out his findings without agenda or vendetta, letting the facts take us where they take us.

The April 5 court filing that pointed to President George W. Bush and Cheney as authorizing Scooter Libby to leak intelligence information about Iraqi weapons to Judith Miller, then a New York Times reporter, carried the mundane header “Government’s response to defendant’s third motion to compel discovery.”

On one level, it was a routine filing for a criminal case. The defendant’s lawyers ask for the moon and every document they can get, ostensibly to prepare their client’s defense but in reality to divert attention from the specific charges and to swamp prosecutors.

more---->http://www.uecrescent.org/articles/stories/public/200604/21/0003XXpp_opinion.html


Fitzgerald is everyone's hero! Except the kool aid drinking republicans, that is. :)


:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. 2006 Knight Ridder Tribune
The prosecution responds with objections to a fishing expedition, explains that it already has turned over voluminous discovery and pointedly argues why the defense is not entitled to other items it seeks.

Except in this case, the 39-page motion contained intriguing detail about Libby’s grand jury testimony regarding his July 8, 2003, discussion with Miller about an October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate involving Iraq’s weapons acquisition attempts. According to the court filing, Libby told the grand jury that he was authorized to talk about the then-classified NIE by Bush through Cheney. The document wouldn’t be officially declassified until later.

This disclosure prompted Bush to at least acknowledge that he ordered the NIE declassified to bolster his arguments about Iraq’s weapons threat. But neither he nor Cheney has yet owned up to behind-the-scenes efforts to discredit administration critic Joseph Wilson.

We might not have the ammunition to demand to know why, if it was so important for the public to know information that the president and vice president found it expedient to secretly declassify, they were not countering their critics in the open. Why was a White House operative instead skulking to clandestine meetings with reporters, hiding behind the confidence that they wouldn’t unmask him?

What we do know is this case has shone a light into the White House, and the view isn’t pretty at all.

© 2006 Knight Ridder Tribune
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. the ryan case in illinois is the
case he will use to nail the boys and girls in washington. i hope this time he checks the background of the jury pool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The only thing I worry about is the Ryan case took 9 years to crack open.
I hope it doesn't take that long for these crooks in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC