Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

408 horsepower and 31 miles per gallon! (No, not a Ford)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:29 PM
Original message
408 horsepower and 31 miles per gallon! (No, not a Ford)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like it would get speeding tickets while it's parked.
PURDEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Too bad Detroit had no long term vision.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Their long-term vision was to build pieces of crap like Excursions and
Suburbans and make lots of money on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Smells like a steak and seats thirty five, Canyonero
Canyonero. (vintage Simpsons)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. Until they stopped selling....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow. You could cut your finger on that car
Does it fly?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No, but
it seats three abreast and the steering controls can be shifted so that anyone can drive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. WHAT??!!??!! Are you series?
that's amazing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
91. Gives a whole new term to backseat driver!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. If they're smart they will bring it to market quick.
That is a pretty nifty concept vehicle. They should do what Chrysler did with the Viper and go from concept to production fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. check out the link
there are about 5 or 6 concepts that are truly breathtaking. Most of them hybrids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. You're right. This one isn't bad either
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 05:48 PM by htuttle
Four wheel drive, mid-engined hybrid with a holographic dashboard!



In real life, this one would be more my style, though:

http://www.toyota.com/vehicles/future/pm.html

I've been hoping to see a tiny one/two seat commuter car. This one is verry nice. If they put something like this in production for under $10K ASAP, they might change the future of the planet. Plus it looks fun! It wouldn't be for everyone -- but it would work great for a significant number of people. Oh, it FOLDS UP FOR PARKING, too. As close to George Jetson's car as I'm ever likely to see.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. The PM
Looks kinda like a Vespa with training wheels.

In Japan Toyota markets a 'micro-van" that appears to be derived from an "Echo" that was left out in the rain and shrunk - or a blunt nosed Scion XB (the delivery company with the logo of a mommie cat carrying a kitten in its mouth has them all over Tokyo).

Remember the Sparrow--

<>-

first manufacturer whent belly up - now it's been reborn in Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
46. A Vespa with training wheels *and a roof*
I've used a Bajaj scooter as my main mode of transportaton for a few years, and a roof and more wheels would make all the difference!

Re: the Sparrow -- I've been getting the impression that a three-wheeled vehicle is more stable with two steering wheels in the front, and a single drive wheel in the back. Seems to be far less chance of flipping. I'd love to drive a Sparrow -- assuming I couldn't find a Messerschmitt, that is...:) (and I can't).

Consider how much less petroleum we'd burn every year if even 1/3 of the commuters on the road would triple their gas mileage with a minimalist commuter vehicle. It would make a considerable dent in both oil consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. And we'd all still get to work (for awhile, anyway).




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #46
56. The problem lies in transition
many people would try scooting except for the morbid reality of running up against a crazy driver in an Expedition. The roads would need to be changed to accomodate light vehicles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #56
77. I think it will probably happen on it's own
I live in a college town that is chock full of scooters. Because everyone sees them all the time, they learn to keep an eye out for them. As more people ride them for economic reasons, more people will get used to watching for them. Most people, Expedition or no, really don't want to run other people over. Makes their insurance go WAY up.

Out in the county highways around here, anyone with half a brain is already watching out for slow moving hay wagons, and I stay off the expressways with it.

It really is an amazing savings. I'm only spending $1.50 every two weeks on gas, and I get to work in a better mood (scooters are Fun!).



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #77
85. I know how much fun they can be
I grew up in India and it was the primary mode of personal trans in New Delhi. No helmets back than though. Many body parts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
62. I've always wanted a Sparrow
They need to be able to distribute it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
28. You can't be serious!
Ugliest POS I've seen since the TT (squashed vw).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #28
50. Assuming you meant
the Audi tt 225 Roadster - did you ever try driving one ? I got mine January 2000 and the road holding was just amazing even before the ESP conversion been done 6 months later. Wuz Nimbus Grey, which was an old Caddy paint code from the mid '30s, with terracotta baseball glove leather. Maybe you just have to like retro stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. I love Audi's lines
is the 225 the same as the TT. I wanted one so bad but there wasn't enough interior space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #54
95. I think you mean
the tt Coupe which is 2 + 2 although the back seats are really only suitable for children. I had the 2 seater Roadster with no room at all behind the front seats and a boot (trunk to you I guess) big enough for a pair of dance shoes and few packets of M&Ms. Such cars are only practical if you're single with no baggage or it's a second car just for fun. I'm a widower and just fancied having a laugh for a while. I did a ridiculously high mileage in a year or so, slaughtered its value and got rid of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. No, I don't mean to dis your car.
I still remember busting out laughing at the '00 (I think) Chicago auto show, when VW had the the new TT's hanging off the wall, and the speaker was taken aback by my outburst.

I am not a good judge of what's kewl and what's not. I thought the PT was a joke, and it sold how much.

I've read nothing but good things about the TT. But those I've passed, and there have been many, seem like they're pretty cramped in that SQUASHED BUG! (just kidding)

KAZ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 04:11 AM
Response to Reply #59
96. No problem
Horses for courses - people buy things like cars for personal reasons not the least of may be practicality. I didn't need that at the time and got the car on the spur of the moment. Only thing that ever bugged me was that I couldn't get fishing rods in it without having the roof down. Fishing in the rain is one thing : driving a ragtop open in the rain just makes you look a muppet. I got a BMW Coupe after that which was more sociable with 4 seats and then went back to 4 x 4's which seem to suit every occasion.

Anyway - you ever get the chance then drive a tt Quattro Roadster which is what I had. With regard to road holding I guarantee you'll loose your nerve before you lose the car on the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. jesus...who needs a car with 400 HP?
and Chevy has at least nine cars, according to their ads, that get over 30mpg

not that I'm a fan of GM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I remember a time when your dad's Olds had 400 HP!!
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 05:52 PM by Neil Lisst
Glory days of cheap gasoline and monster engines.

You know I'm talkin' about the 1960s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oh yea, I remember well! I still get heart palps when I see
some of the beautiful restorations rolling down the road!

I also remember when we used to go to the dealership once a year to "See the new models"!

NOW you can't tell one car from the other and FEW have any PIZAZZ at all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. a guy nearby has a mint condition '63 chevy
all those Chevies were sweet from about 1955 through 1964.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. My son has a 72 Cuda convert. Beautiful car! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. the barracuda was a sweet little car, came out about 1968, I think
Plymouth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. Yep Plymouth. The Dodge was the Challenger.
I only wish I had purchased one back then and kept it! You can't believe what they're selling for NOW! A fully restored Cuda convert sold at the Barrett-Jackson auction for more than $1 MILLION!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
47. I loved the Road Runner. A friend had one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #33
63. You're kidding!
OMG. Half the guys I hung out in high school with owned souped up Challengers, Road Runners, GTOs, 68 Camaro's and one with a very nice hemi Cuda. I can only imagine how much they'd be worth if they'd kept them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #63
68. I'm sure if you asked them, they already heard about that auction.
http://www.sportscarmarket.com/auctions/milliondollarsales.php

1970 Plymouth Hemi 'Cuda $2,160,000 Barrett-Jackson Scottsdale AZ USA 01/14/2006

The link is to the sale prices of the cars auctioned.

Here's a pic of the Cuda







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. I know what you mean, same here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Gas was 16 cents a gallon. It's a different game now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. 16 Cents?
It was 25 Cents a gallon when I started driving, same price as a pack of cigarettes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Gas wars were rampant - it was cruisin' heaven in my town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. there will never be another time like it
no one wearing seatbelts
sharp objects all over the entire
huge engine run on cheap gasoline

the sound of a big engine with a big cam barely idling ... ah...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Yes, there is a time like it.
The cars today will smoke anything out of the muscle-car era; get good mileage, safer than shit, and insurable. The '60s aint got nothing on the present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. keep dreamin that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. My wife's Acura TL is faster than...
a '71 Mach 1, 0-60. There's no dreaming about it. It's a combination of technology; rubber, timing, weight, and traction. All that and 30 MPG. We do progress, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #51
66. sure it is
we did have stop watches back then, too, you know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #66
88. It's absolutely true - performance cars today will chew up and spit out
the old ones. Those old cars' horsepower was judged on a different scale (at the flywheel with no accessories - way over-rated compared to today), they were much heavier and couldn't handle worth a darn.

That said, there is something completely cool about one of those old cars with a big, loud monster engine. I LOVE the new Dodge Challenger. That thing is sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #88
93. they were great, and most guys had their "souped up"
don't tell me a 454 hp with dual fours and a 4.11 rear end won't outrun the street machines I see today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
55. Pure HP. 409ci/409hp. These kids today missed all that. Too bad.
Real cars then, not this plastic stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #55
89. ummm...plastic is lighter. So is aluminum - a BIG component in newer cars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. and the minimum wage was .90 an hour, so you could buy 6 gallons
for an hour's work

Now, it's 2 gallons for one hour of minimum wage, and really not even that any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
30. I would be shocked if any stock Big 4 American car of the 60s
had 400hp. Even "The Judge" and all that. But I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. OK, I'm wrong
Roadrunner had 425bhp according to Wikipedia.

But I would guess a Roadrunner was twice the weight at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Yes, you would be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Question: What is the difference b/w gross and brake horsepower?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. It's really gross vs net hp.
Gross was pure power at the block. Net mandated you hook up the afterthoughts (anything driven off of the engine, i.e. manifolds, mufflers, etc). About a 15% difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #35
70. Yes, but any gear head worth a salt would balance/blueprint his engine
Then take it to an engine builder like Keith Black and have it run on the dyno.

BTW, the reason that yesterday's horsepower felt so "good" was that the ergonomics of the car factored very little into the equation.

You wanted more 0-60 speed - just tuck more motor under the hood.

I have an Audi A6 2.7T twin-turbo - 0-60 in 5.2. It's fun, but it is NOTHING like my old '65 396/425 Vette. That was just a pure adrenaline rush every time you mashed the pedal.

Today's cars have NOTHING on that.

Nothing,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. If you can get a 5.2, 0 - 60 out of of a 2.7L A6...
...then angels fly out of my butt. :)

You have one heck of car there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
76. 1 horsepower per cubic inch was the norm in that era..
sometimes even more. A 350 CI LT-1 from GM had around 375 horsies, if memory serves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I do
If I can get horsepower AND mileage, sign me up.

(Still longing for the '65 396/425 Vette coupe with side pipes that I had during the early 90's)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
40. Nine cars? That's all they made?
It sure as hell looks that way to me...the closest GM dealership to my house sells Pontiacs, Cadillacs and Hondas. The only vehicles on the lot that gets better than 20MPG are the Hondas.

OTOH, if you want a GTO or an Escalade, go straight there...they have LOTS of those!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
94. I love them horses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. TRON LIVES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. 512 HP, 475+ TQ, 3100 lbs and 26 mpg


made in the U.S. with union labor, and you can buy one now at your local dealer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. There you go!
I was livid reading this thread. Such ignorance. The regular variant gets 29 MPG(400 hp)and is available NOW (along with the Z06 version you posted). Sorry, the rest of the world trails the Corvette.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. "Livid?" Really?
Wow, you're easily upset. :eyes:

Deep breaths: It's just a thread. On a discussion board. About a cool-looking concept car. That is all. Breathe, grasshopper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. You're right.
But I'm a Vette guy, through and through.

My dad was a 30 year vet at GM. I'm protective. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Yeah....I know all about you 'vette people.
You're kinda nutty for those cars. ;-)

I'm a classic Mustang woman, myself....but I will admit to thinking that is one COOL looking concept car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Hate to say it, but I love the new Stang.
My Dad had a '71, 289. The new one has "heritage" written all over it.

It just an "American car" thing for me. I always think of my Dad when I drive my '99.

BTW, we own an Acura too. My wife will buy nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. I like those, too.
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 07:13 PM by Shakespeare
I haven't gotten around to test-driving one yet (because that would be a very, very dangerous thing to do...I'm quite happy with my '98 Civic SI coupe, and don't need the temptation). When I was in junior high, my dad rebuilt a 64 1/2 from rusted shell (that the neighbors laughed at) to showroom condition. He ended up selling it when we moved across country about a year before I got my driver's license, and I've never completely recovered from the trauma (it was going to be my car).

My first car was a '79 Mustang 302 V8. My dad described it as being "fast enough to pass anything but a gas station."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. My first real "sports car' was an Integra (87).
I do love Hondas. I drove a Civic for 4 years, an Accord for 6 years (twice), and we'll probably buy Acuras for the rest of my natural born years.

Hate to say it, but 64 Vettes are going for 2 arms and a leg these days. Ouch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Fire Donating Member (588 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #44
80. Oh those old/new FORDS!
Way back when I had a '70 Mach 1 with all the good stuff! A 351 Cleveland, 4-speed Toploader, shaker scoop, rear window slats, blue and black and FAAASSST all over! I still miss that tire smokin' Camaro chompin' musclehorse! Alas - the only Fords I have at this stage in life are a Windstar minivan and an old F-150 beater for work.
But I will refuse to die until I own one of the new GTs. Well, if I can't come up with the $160 grand, I'll settle for one of the (hopefully) soon to be produced Shelby GT500s. Oh yeah! 500+ horses of supercharged 5.4 V8 mechanical adrenaline.........MPG be damned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #80
86. welcome to the site!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
61. yes, i'm a big fan of the Z06
and GM Powertrain as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
65. Ahh yes, the Vette and its Wagon Trail rear suspension
technology

It's not that impressive a number, anything that sleek should be getting upwards of 30 mpg in the first place
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. It does.
And nothing foreign or domestic can touch it. Viper, $85k, 15 mpg. Porsche, $95k, 18 mpg. Vette smokes both, and is union made.

Vette has an independent read end suspension, and has humiliated the Porsche at Nuburgring many times over.

What "wagon trail" are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. Leaf springs
Wagon trail technologoy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #69
78. lol
mock the springs and the pushrod engine if you must, but you can NOT mock/dispute the results on the track against the competition...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. That's sheer straight-line speed catching up
I'd rather take a Porsche through the twisties
or even a Lotus Elan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. ok, the Lotus I understand
but the Porsche? don't they still use that 'outdated' Mac strut? (I realize they are all great cars; just messin' with you a little :spank:)


there is more leaf spring info in this link:

http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=13582
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #83
87. I wish that guy would learn how to spell anti-roll bar
What being a suspension expert and all :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #69
90. That car on leaf springs ran the second fastest Nurnburg ring in a
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 10:43 PM by kysrsoze
production car ever. I'm big on imports, but the Z06 is an absolute monster at the track. Even if it's old technology, they have perfected it. .98G on the skidpad is nothing to sneeze at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #90
97. Yes, that track gets pointed towards a lot with the Vette
because it's got really long straight areas, like a drag strip with the odd banking turn. What other tracks does it dominate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
57. Sure, 6th gear and 55mph :-)
EPA Estimated MPG city/hwy
6.0L LS2 V8 six-speed manual transmission 18/28
Six-Speed Paddle Shift with Automatic Modes 17/27
7.0 LS7 V8 six-speed manual transmission 16/26

If you drive it like you mean it, forget those numbers. It takes a lot of fuel to feed 6-7 liters displacement.

With an electric drive motor at each wheel, it's going to make SCARY torque. My Prius already is in the 300 lb/ft with one electric motor from 0-1500rpm. :eek:

Before I went into the motor of my LS1 Camaro, I would get 20mpg with an A4. After the mods, 13mpg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. how heavy was it modded?
did you use a torque converter? steeper gearing, etc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #60
74. Oh yes
4600 stall converter, 4:10's, heads/baby cam, every bolt-on, 8pt rollbar... :) :) :)

Prius doesn't have a trans, no need to worry about that problem anymore! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #74
79. yeah, that's going to burn up a whole lotta fuel
but that sounds like a mean ride! probably turned more than a few heads at the local dragstrip...

I had an ex-gf that had a prius as a work car...very quiet, and the transitions are seamless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. It was bad with the 4" Mufflex exhaust
2am going up hill, you could hear it for blocks, even with cats on the headers. :)

Parking garages was car alarms going off like crazy... :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. I've averaged 23.9 MPG during the life...
of my 5.7L 99. 118,000 miles. Mostly stop-and-go on I-55 in the south suburbs of Chicago. 23.9 mpg, and there is seldom a day when I don't see triple digits. Engine technology has come a long way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #64
75. Manual I assume?
And you didn't defeat the skip-shift? Scary how fast these things can be right out of the box. 13.5 in the quarter and dyno'd 300hp/300tq at the wheels with 500 miles on the dial.

This Toyota Volta though, will probably have over 2000lbs of tq right out of the box. Electric motors on all 4 wheels... yummy! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
27. Funny thing is
unless they've changed their laws it's too powerful to be sold in Japan - export only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Japan has been selling 295+ hp cars for years,
We also underrated HP in the in the 60's, for different reasons (insurance).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #31
43. As far a I'm aware
that was the reason that the last Supra was taken out of production. I think you may find that there are power limits to cars which can be driven of Japanese roads although the cars can be exported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. The Supra crapped out due to price/timing.
It got really pricey in the '90s, just when there was a whole bunch of new rods coming on the market. It still can be a beast though. 400 hp with a couple of minor mods. In fact, they've become quite the collectors item.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Its one of the options on my Need for Speed (version 1)
Fastest off the mark,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #52
72. It's still my dream car
Black, twin turbo, 6 speed.

Getaway in Stokholm 2 is also the most beautiful car movie ever made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tactical Progressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
58. The Volta is totally concept
I don't think there's much chance it will ever be produced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
71. Walking is free.
Running has a cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
84. 502 hp, 2 wheels:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
92. Move over Toyota, the Variable Compression engine is coming!
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 11:04 PM by nebula
'Nissan will be rolling out the world's first production VC engine in the Nissan Skyline--an affordable, high-performance sports car. It has the power of a 250-hp V6 while getting the fuel economy of a small liter 4-cylinder engine. The VC-equipped Skyline is slated for introduction as early as 2007.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC