Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Substitute the word Terrorist for the word Communist...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:17 PM
Original message
Substitute the word Terrorist for the word Communist...
I watched Good Night and Good Luck again last night and it struck me that the GOP is following McCarthy's playbook to the letter. If you listen to all McCarthy's speeches and substitute the word Terrorist for the word Communist you have exactly the same witch hunt now that went on in the 50's. Of course you could also substitute the word Liberal. Watching the GOP get away with this again is adding weight to a load I am already overburdened with. I am just so tired of getting my hopes up only to have them dashed at my feet. What is it going to take? I see only 2 ways to turn the tide. One is a sex scandal, the other... revolution. Barring those two things I can't see Bush not finishing his last few years and putting the final nail in the coffin that was once America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. The good news is that...
McCarthy was tossed and we eventually threw out the House Un-American Activities Committee.

They're a lot slicker about doing things now, but there is always hope we'll wake up again like we did the last time.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Last time we had a media that would tell the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Took 'em long enough, didn't it? The highly...
touted "honest" media of the past, like the Hearst papers, weren't to eager to jump on this particular bandwagon at the time.

Where were Cronkite, Reasoner, and the rest of the "heros" out there digging into McCarthy's drunken rantings? How long did they stay silent about the blacklist, the accusations about the state department, the hearings....






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. True enough. I am not saying they were stelar then, only that the
press is so very skewed now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. The good news: poll numbers are in the toilet.
* is at the lowest in middle America, specifically Indiana,
since 1964 w/37%, according to a journalist from the state's capital tonight
on Scarborough's show. White males make up the majority of the disillusioned.
Hope abounds, and I heard this on Scarborough, some r/w media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Problem is that the Dem numbers aren't that great either.
We may squeek by in November, but what we need is a reformation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. If the blivet is at 37% in Indiana, the Dems' numbers
are the balance, say 60%, not bad numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Actually not. I have seen some polls that show it more around
50 % at best. And it is not strong support. It is the support of people who do not like Bush, but it is not a firm groundswell. The Dems are going to have to take stronger stands and show unity around the things that matter most to people. Their message needs to get clearer, stronger and persistent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Of course. That's why those of us who lived through that time
can't believe we are being giving the same crap over again in this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastDemocratInSC Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Nothing will happen until the Repugs make it happen
The way that the Democrats are running from Feingold should make it clear that they are total wimps, probably because they all suckle from the same nipples that corporate American presents to the Repugs. They are all nipple-mates.

When the Repugs decide that Bush is hurting their agenda Bush will be dumped, and the Repugs will appear stronger for the effort while the Democrats, who should be leading the damn fight, will be shouting encouraging things while they cower in the corner.

I am so angry right now with our party. If we can't effectively hit The Idiot while he is at 30 something percent in the polls then we can't possibly effectively govern in his place. This is a screw up of huge proportions in every way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm angry also. I like your name as I have a brother in SC
AND NC, both repugs but I've always attributed their preferences to the states they live in and their friends who influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Nipple-mates... funny.
"If we can't effectively hit The Idiot while he is at 30 something percent in the polls then we can't possibly effectively govern in his place."

Exactly! I mean for chrissakes, we couldn't stop the impeachment of Clinton for cheating on his wife yet we can't even get Bush censured for violating the Constitution? You think about this shit too much and you'll go nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yep, that their M-O
Some things never change...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC