Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Neocon Advocates Civil War in Iraq as "Strategic" Policy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 03:50 PM
Original message
Neocon Advocates Civil War in Iraq as "Strategic" Policy
Neocon Advocates Civil War in Iraq as "Strategic" Policy
Daniel Pipes Finds Comfort in Muslims Killing Muslims
By JOHN WALSH

......................

Now the neocons are beginning to advocate for civil war in Iraq quite openly. The clearest statement of this strategy as yet comes from pre-eminent neocon and ardent Zionist Daniel Pipes. In a recent piece in the Jerusalem Post, Pipes spills the beans. He writes:

"The bombing on February 22 of the Askariya shrine in Samarra, Iraq, was a tragedy, but it was not an American or a coalition tragedy. Iraq's plight is neither a coalition responsibility nor a particular danger to the West. Fixing Iraq is neither the coalition's responsibility, nor its burden. When Sunni terrorists target Shi'ites and vice versa, non-Muslims are less likely to be hurt. Civil war in Iraq, in short, would be a humanitarian tragedy, but not a strategic one."

As ever Pipes's anti-Arab racism is simply too rabid to be hidden. If Muslims are busy killing other Muslims, then "non-Muslims" are less likely to be hurt!! What does that say about Muslim lives? And of course both Sunnis and Shia must be labeled "terrorists." Pipes is doing nothing more endorsing than the oldest of colonial strategies: Divide et impera.

Pipes envisions other "benefits" to the civil war "strategy," such as inhibiting the spread of democracy in the Middle East. Pipes again:

"Civil war will "terminate the dream of Iraq serving as a model for other Middle Eastern countries, thus delaying the push toward elections. This would have the effect of keeping Islamists from being legitimated by the popular vote, as Hamas was just a month ago."

more at:
http://www.counterpunch.com/walsh03092006.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. IF this was our goal, why didn't we evac as soon as we got saddam?
oh, because it wasn't our goal.


i would like to kindly point out that everything that has happened and continues to happen in iraq has worked out VERY nicely for domestic oil producers. who also heavily funded shrub. who is also an oilman. as is cheney.

i'm just sayin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. If you play with fire you might get burnt. Don't these people ever learn.
Edited on Sat Mar-11-06 04:01 PM by IsItJustMe
A rumer is already being circulated in the middle east that the Americans were behind the mosque explosion.

I don't care how you slice it, it will be bad bad bad news if there is a civil war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. The neo-cons are toast.
Their butts are going to be thrown out of office for 30 years after this last Administration. Americans like to think of themselves as adults and they've finally figured out that middle-school emotional temper tantrums don't make our country safer or better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think this plan has already been implemented by the US..
The bombing of the Askariya shrine smelled like black ops to me. I don't see where anyone benefits more than the US from civil war in Iraq. Maybe Pipes knows something we don't. :evilfrown:

Oh, and....Pipes is scum. "Civil war in Iraq, in short, would be a humanitarian tragedy, but not a strategic one." :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Scene of Pee Wee falling off of bicycle
"I meant to do that."

If it wasn't so sad, it would be funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Daniel Pipes says
Fixing Iraq is neither the coalition's responsibility, nor its burden. Keep talking Danny! You are the one creating Islamists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC