Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scum sucking traitors to their country

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 07:01 PM
Original message
Scum sucking traitors to their country
By DOUG THOMPSON

The next time some loudmouth partisan puke Democrat gets in my face and starts yapping about how much better things would be if his party were running the government in Washington, I'm going to pull out the vote tally sheet for the USA Patriot Act in Thursday's Senate session and ram it down his lying throat.
Where was his party when it came time to take a stand for freedom in this country? Hiding like a coward, that's where. Only nine Democrats and one independent - former Republican Jim Jeffords - had guts enough to vote against reauthorizing the fascist piece of crap called the Patriot Act.

The rest, including Harry Reid, that scum-sucking capitulator who claims to be the Senate Democratic leader, dropped their pants, bent over, grabbed their ankles and handed George W. Bush the k-y jelly and said "bung-hole me all you want sir. I like getting screwed by dictators."

What about the leading contender for the 2008 Democratic Presidential nomination, the so-called "gentle lady from New York," Hillary Rodham Clinton? Oh, she let Bush and the rest of the Republican party gang bang her like frat boys in a horny drunken brawl. Too late to cry rape Hillary. You proved yourself a political slut like most of the rest of your party.

This is the opposition party? This is the party that partisans claim will save this country from the abuses and excesses of too many years of Republican domination? Christ, these losers couldn't lead a Cub Scout pack on an overnight camping trip in a suburban back yard.

More at: http://www.capitolhillblue.com/blog/2006/03/when_democr...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
neverevergivein Donating Member (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are you upset about this?
Just asking....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Harsh but true (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well that about sums it up
It's all too horrendously, sadly, true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peanutcat Donating Member (492 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm tired of hearing that shit!
Just what were the Democrats supposed to do with the information they had at the time? I'm convinced many of them were convinced there was a threat, but now they, and and we, know better. If the information wasn't in part made up, it was definatly cherry-picked to give the Bush adninistration the results they wanted.You can't blame people for making a bad decision with bad information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Uh, Right
Then why did the blue-haired Unitarian ladies standing next to me at the anti-war protests know that Saddam had no WMDs? There was plenty of evidence that Bush was lying, and just the fact that Saddam let the inspectors in, and they were finding NOTHING should have been enough to at least cause the Democrats to demand more time. The IAEA, and plenty of others were questioning Bush's "intelligence." Iraq had been under sanctions for 10 years, and Colin Powell himself, in early 2001, stated that Iraq was no threat.

They made a bad decision because they were spineless. Face it. They are enablers, most of them, with a few shining exceptions (my favorite is Kucinich).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Here in 2006, there's *NO F'ING EXCUSE* for not knowing better.
Here in 2006, there's *NO F'ING EXCUSE* for not knowing better.

But they're still busy surrendering at every opportunity.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I suggest you see the OP link before you say more!
Friendly advice, cause they damn sure can't claim to know better & that is why Doug Thompson, the guy who wrote that article, while a little excitable it's true, given to exaggeration-indeed, but he is writing about the events of last week!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peanutcat Donating Member (492 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. oops.
My bad. :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats_win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Right and wrong. Don't forget who's in charge. The GOP F*cdUp America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Doug's right again.
And he said it so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. And when someone does stand up to them they get this......
......Reid is threatened.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Did anyone say anything of support for Reid or in condemnation of Frist??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. How many Republicans voted against it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. ONE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. But the Democrats are the villains in this.
I've never quite understood this reasoning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. They are supposed to be the opposition party, against corporatism
and FOR us.

The opposite is true. They are moderate Republicans, not Democrats. They just take our money as well as corporate money. And as an added bonus, they prevent a REAL Democrat from getting elected by occupying that seat in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Yes, I am too often disappointed by their failure to oppose,
but focusing solely on that takes the onus off those who are actively doing evil. It lets people like Bush off the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zonmoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. I honestly don't understand
why progressives don't abandon the democratic party since they have abandoned them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. DINO's have to go.
Or we're absolutely fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
19. Thompson is channeling the Rude Pundit.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Oct 01st 2014, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC