Scum sucking traitors to their country

[Quixote1818]

By DOUG THOMPSON

The next time some loudmouth partisan puke Democrat gets in my face and starts yapping about how much better things would be if his party were running the government in Washington, I'm going to pull out the vote tally sheet for the USA Patriot Act in Thursday's Senate session and ram it down his lying throat.
Where was his party when it came time to take a stand for freedom in this country? Hiding like a coward, that's where. Only nine Democrats and one independent - former Republican Jim Jeffords - had guts enough to vote against reauthorizing the fascist piece of crap called the Patriot Act.

The rest, including Harry Reid, that scum-sucking capitulator who claims to be the Senate Democratic leader, dropped their pants, bent over, grabbed their ankles and handed George W. Bush the k-y jelly and said "bung-hole me all you want sir. I like getting screwed by dictators."

What about the leading contender for the 2008 Democratic Presidential nomination, the so-called "gentle lady from New York," Hillary Rodham Clinton? Oh, she let Bush and the rest of the Republican party gang bang her like frat boys in a horny drunken brawl. Too late to cry rape Hillary. You proved yourself a political slut like most of the rest of your party.

This is the opposition party? This is the party that partisans claim will save this country from the abuses and excesses of too many years of Republican domination? Christ, these losers couldn't lead a Cub Scout pack on an overnight camping trip in a suburban back yard.

More at: http://www.capitolhillblue.com/blog/2006/03/when_democr...

[neverevergivein]

1. Are you upset about this?

Just asking....

[magellan]

2. Harsh but true (nt)

[boobooday]

3. Well that about sums it up

It's all too horrendously, sadly, true.

[Peanutcat]

5. I'm tired of hearing that shit!

Just what were the Democrats supposed to do with the information they had at the time? I'm convinced many of them were convinced there was a threat, but now they, and and we, know better. If the information wasn't in part made up, it was definatly cherry-picked to give the Bush adninistration the results they wanted.You can't blame people for making a bad decision with bad information.

[boobooday]

6. Uh, Right

Then why did the blue-haired Unitarian ladies standing next to me at the anti-war protests know that Saddam had no WMDs? There was plenty of evidence that Bush was lying, and just the fact that Saddam let the inspectors in, and they were finding NOTHING should have been enough to at least cause the Democrats to demand more time. The IAEA, and plenty of others were questioning Bush's "intelligence." Iraq had been under sanctions for 10 years, and Colin Powell himself, in early 2001, stated that Iraq was no threat.

They made a bad decision because they were spineless. Face it. They are enablers, most of them, with a few shining exceptions (my favorite is Kucinich).

[Tesha]

7. Here in 2006, there's *NO F'ING EXCUSE* for not knowing better.

Here in 2006, there's *NO F'ING EXCUSE* for not knowing better.

But they're still busy surrendering at every opportunity.

Tesha

[acmejack]

9. I suggest you see the OP link before you say more!

Friendly advice, cause they damn sure can't claim to know better & that is why Doug Thompson, the guy who wrote that article, while a little excitable it's true, given to exaggeration-indeed, but he is writing about the events of last week!

[Peanutcat]

12. oops.

My bad.

[Democrats_win]

4. Right and wrong. Don't forget who's in charge. The GOP F*cdUp America.

[BuyingThyme]

8. Doug's right again.

And he said it so well.

[Minnesota Libra]

10. And when someone does stand up to them they get this......

......Reid is threatened.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Did anyone say anything of support for Reid or in condemnation of Frist??

[QC]

11. How many Republicans voted against it? n/t

[Rainscents]

14. ONE!

[QC]

15. But the Democrats are the villains in this.

I've never quite understood this reasoning.

[upi402]

17. They are supposed to be the opposition party, against corporatism

and FOR us.

The opposite is true. They are moderate Republicans, not Democrats. They just take our money as well as corporate money. And as an added bonus, they prevent a REAL Democrat from getting elected by occupying that seat in office.

[QC]

18. Yes, I am too often disappointed by their failure to oppose,

but focusing solely on that takes the onus off those who are actively doing evil. It lets people like Bush off the hook.

[zonmoy]

13. I honestly don't understand

why progressives don't abandon the democratic party since they have abandoned them.

[upi402]

16. DINO's have to go.

Or we're absolutely fucked.

[RUMMYisFROSTED]

19. Thompson is channeling the Rude Pundit.