Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Former NARAL president Kate Michelman may run against Santorum.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
uberblonde Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 10:28 AM
Original message
Former NARAL president Kate Michelman may run against Santorum.
http://susiemadrak.com/2006/03/04/07/44/dark-horse /

Not sure how I feel about this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Democratic discussion forum
   Replies to this thread
  - I don't think she stands much of a chance in Pa.  napi21   Mar-04-06 10:36 AM   #1 
  - Sounds like it has Nader 2000 written all over it. nt  skipos   Mar-04-06 10:39 AM   #2 
  - Last I knew, Casey was polling well against Santorum...  Earth_First   Mar-04-06 10:42 AM   #3 
     - It could be very advantageous--for Santorum.  QC   Mar-04-06 10:47 AM   #4 
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think she stands much of a chance in Pa.
Even though Casey is pro-life, he has committed that Roe is the law, and he will abide by the law! Just the name NARAL scares a whole lot of Pennsylvanians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like it has Nader 2000 written all over it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Last I knew, Casey was polling well against Santorum...
Why would this be viewed upon as advantageous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-04-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It could be very advantageous--for Santorum.
Apparently Michelman would rather have a senator who is 100% committed to banning abortion than one who doesn't believe in it but doesn't want to outlaw it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri May 24th 2013, 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC