Was it just a couple of days ago that the administration mouthpieces were touting 200,000 trained and battle-ready Iraqi troops? Why yes it was:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x503181But that was Thursday, and now it's Saturday:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/02/24/iraq.security/index.html?section=cnn_topstoriesPentagon: Iraqi troops downgraded
No Iraqi battalion capable of fighting without U.S. support
Friday, February 24, 2006; Posted: 8:29 p.m. EST (01:29 GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The only Iraqi battalion capable of fighting without U.S. support has been downgraded to a level requiring them to fight with American troops backing them up, the Pentagon said Friday.
The battalion, made up of 700 to 800 Iraqi Army soldiers, has repeatedly been offered by the U.S. as an example of the growing independence of the Iraqi military.
{snip}
The battalion, according to the Pentagon, was downgraded from "level one" to "level two" after a recent quarterly assessment of its capabilities.
"Level one" means the battalion is able to fight on its own; "level two" means it requires support from U.S. troops; and "level three" means it must fight alongside U.S. troops.
________________________
Okay, so maybe it's not 200,000 troops. Guess those training wheels will have to stay on Iraq for just a little while longer. And more people (troops, civilians and "insurgents") will die.