Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

200,000 ready Iraqi troops? Did we say 200,000?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 11:36 AM
Original message
200,000 ready Iraqi troops? Did we say 200,000?
Edited on Sat Feb-25-06 11:38 AM by gratuitous
Was it just a couple of days ago that the administration mouthpieces were touting 200,000 trained and battle-ready Iraqi troops? Why yes it was:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x503181

But that was Thursday, and now it's Saturday:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/02/24/iraq.security/index.html?section=cnn_topstories

Pentagon: Iraqi troops downgraded
No Iraqi battalion capable of fighting without U.S. support

Friday, February 24, 2006; Posted: 8:29 p.m. EST (01:29 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The only Iraqi battalion capable of fighting without U.S. support has been downgraded to a level requiring them to fight with American troops backing them up, the Pentagon said Friday.

The battalion, made up of 700 to 800 Iraqi Army soldiers, has repeatedly been offered by the U.S. as an example of the growing independence of the Iraqi military.

{snip}

The battalion, according to the Pentagon, was downgraded from "level one" to "level two" after a recent quarterly assessment of its capabilities.

"Level one" means the battalion is able to fight on its own; "level two" means it requires support from U.S. troops; and "level three" means it must fight alongside U.S. troops.

________________________

Okay, so maybe it's not 200,000 troops. Guess those training wheels will have to stay on Iraq for just a little while longer. And more people (troops, civilians and "insurgents") will die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think that refers to the total trained over 3 years. They only have
700 to 800 who have not left. No way * is going to leave there so no way there is going to be real training. Now we're hearing that with the civil war coming, * might not be able to drawdown the troops for the election. So who really is behind bombing the mosques?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This Iraqi blogger thinks the mosque bombing was a controlled demolition.
Don't know how :tinfoilhat:erry this is...but, here's his theory:
Baghdad Dweller blog

Who bombed the shrines?



The perfect controlled demolition.

Take a good look at the picture above because I will tell you what I see. I see a damaged dome caused by an explosion set very professionally that the two minarets from the both sides weren’t effected by the explosion.

Not even one single “gold plate” fall down from the minarets while the explosion was so heavy that caused the collapse of the dome. Tell me, Is this work of few terrorists who wants to finish the job as fast as possible?

The one who did this, entered the mosque comfortably carrying explosions, he had all the time to study the construction of the building and find the perfect angles to set the explosions in a way that only the dome will be destroyed.

This is a professional, controlled demolition and the bombs set by demolition experts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What's even more scary is there are a number of prophesies about
the tower. They mentioned them on TV yesterday. I will have to find them. They were not pretty. As for who did the bombing - anytime there is a problem and things get worse my first thought is - our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. professional?
Only the center of the dome is gone, the top is the weak part of any dome. There is an outward tensile component of stress in the sides of a dome. IMO, professionals would have attacked the sides causing the whole, structure to collapse. The picture shows only the weakest part was destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Preparation for shrine destruction must have taken at least 12 hours
http://truth-about-iraqis.blogspot.com/


Construction Minister Jassem Mohammed Jaafar said Friday that the placing of the explosives (in the shrine) must have taken at least 12 hours.

“According to initial reports, the bombing was technically well conceived and could only have been carried out by specialists,” the minister told Iraqia state television.

Jaafar, who toured the devastated thousand-year-old shrine on Thursday a day after the bombing which brought down its golden dome, said “holes were dug into the mausoleum’s four main pillars and packed with explosives.”

“Then the charges were connected together and linked to another charge placed just under the dome. The wires were then linked to a detonator which was triggered at a distance,” the minister added.

To drill into the pillars would have taken at least four hours per pillar, he also estimated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I call bullshit
So, for 12 hours, CIA agents were inside the most holy of holiest shrines causing damage by drilling holes without someone raising a ruckus. When I was in Iraq we couldn't even drive in Najaf, near the Imam Ali Shrine without al-Sadr's forces emerging to start fighting.

Americans can't just walk into Mosques.

And if he toured the wreckage, why the reference to the "according to initial reports"? Shouldn't he as Construction Minister be able to produce an engineering diagram and reconstruct what occurred?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Mercenaries, paid by CIA - use your brain n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "use your brain" Okay I'll use my brain
Who are these mercenaries?

Are they Iraqis or are they foreigners? Where did they get their training? From a 6 hour CIA explosives course?

If they are Iraqis what tribe are they from? How did we convince them to profane a shrine? How did we recruit them? What about their families?

If they aren't Iraqis are they Kurds, Turks, Armenians, American Muslims of middle eastern descent... Jews?

The Iraqis are very tribal, if they are foreigners have they been hanging around Samarra for a few weeks, to understand the situation on the ground? Where we they holding up in an abandoned building? What did they eat, where did they clean themselves, shave, and deal with biological necessities? Or did they just roll out of an american base followed by a HMMWV convoy and disembark a few hundred meters form the Shrine?

Or did they just come in for the mission? Did they have detailed schematics of the construction and not just satellite images, they would need detailed blueprints in order to have it be "so professional" as I've heard people claim on DU?

How were they infiltrated into the city? How did they extricate themselves?

Do they speak Arabic? Is it the mercs first language or did they learn it via scholastic method? If they do, was their accent good, Iraqis can tell were you are from by accent.

Did they sign up for this mission knowing they were going to be disavowed? If not, why aren't they spilling their guts?

How did they remain in the Shrine for 12 hours without anyone noticing? Who was guarding the Shrine? Where were they for hours and hours?

What was the explosive? C-4 is American (and easily identifiable) and there isn't an abundance of it over there, did they use PE-4, something else? How was it detonated?

I don't feel like asking more questions on this thread...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC