Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran sets terms for UN nuclear checks (from Al Jazeera)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
freefall Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 09:12 AM
Original message
Iran sets terms for UN nuclear checks (from Al Jazeera)
This is Iran's response to France's concerns that it was pursuing nuclear capability. It is over 12 hours old or I would have posted to LBN.

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/A5D7659F-80CF-4098-AE57-103DB691D88E.htm

Iran sets terms for UN nuclear checks

Friday 17 February 2006, 19:29 Makka Time, 16:29 GMT

Iran is ready to ask its parliament to ratify an accord allowing UN inspectors to resume snap checks of its nuclear facilities on certain conditions, Iran's embassy in Paris said on Friday.

The Iranian statement, which came the day after France accused Iran of pursuing a secret military nuclear programme, sketched out a three-stage process to end a standoff with the international community over Iran's nuclear programme.

Ratification of the Additional Protocol of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which gives the UN nuclear watchdog greater powers to inspect suspected nuclear facilities, has been a key demand made of Tehran by Western nations.

Iran, which began implementing the protocol in 2003, but has never presented it to lawmakers for ratification, stopped applying it this month after the board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) voted to report Tehran to the UN Security Council.

snip - more at link

Peace

freefall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder how chimp will try to derail this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freefall Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Found another link. The "offer was rejected by a senior US official."
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/world/3668819.html

It's from the Houston Chronicle quoting the NYT:


"Feb. 18, 2006, 1:51AM
Iran offers to permit nuclear spot checks
But U.S. rejects proposal that still allows nation to enrich uranium

New York Times

WASHINGTON - A senior Iranian envoy, making a new bid to resolve the impasse over his country's nuclear program, was quoted Friday as saying Iran would allow the resumption of spot international inspections of its nuclear facilities if it could continue limited uranium enrichment.

But the offer was dismissed by a senior U.S. official.

The Iranian offer appeared to be addressed to a demand from Britain, France and Germany that Iran ratify an additional protocol of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty that would allow for surprise inspections.

<snip>

The offer came in a statement from the Iranian Embassy in Paris, according to Reuters News Service."

<more at link>

You can bet the administration will knock down every diplomatic initiative Iran makes. After all, you can't preemptively attack them if you are engaged in diplomacy.


:scared: :scared:

Peace

freefa;;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC