Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

KO's report just shot cheney's story to hell...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:19 PM
Original message
KO's report just shot cheney's story to hell...
if you missed it, catch the rerun. He just covered all of the inconsistencies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. But the good ol' boys running the state of Texas...
...have already said that no charges are going to be brought against Cheney, that it was an "accident," so while we keep one eye on this the economy still sucks, Bush is rubbing himself at the prospect of a military strike against Iran, and...well, let's just say that NOTHING...IS...GOING...TO...HAPPEN...TO...CHENEY.

The hooks of evil are sunk too deep.

This will blow over and Cheney will walk away without a frigging scratch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. apt description of Kenedy County.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Telling America to Get Cheney'd
And this is exactly the way they've been treating the Congress and the entire country for 5 years. They do whatever they want because they think they're above the law and tell us to get Cheney'd, just like they did to Texas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think this scratch so to speak is very politically damaging...
One of the worst of their administration. A criminal investigation may not help us at all..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I can only base my thoughts on what I've seen so far...
...despite ALL of the headlines, the Plame affair, the Diebold machines, Abramoff, Iraq...where has Bush taken a hit?

REALLY...name some LOSSES.

OK, his Social Security scheme never got off the ground, and "Tax Reform"...passing the burden from his "base" to the middle class...may never happen.

Maybe Harriet Miers was a red herring. Maybe he nominated her so that his "base" would WET ITSELF over Scalito (they did, by the way).

So he got Roberts and Scalito on the Supreme Court...a "legacy" that will FAR outlast his "presidency"

Rumsfeld still has a job.

Condi is Secretary of MOTHERF**KING STATE, for GOD'S sake.

The Patriot Act looks like it will get extended.

The agenda keeps' on a-rollin', Stretch.

The "damage" will be shrugged off and Bush will keep doing whatever the hell he wants to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. They've tried to use the same spin techniques they have for years
in a situation where its inappropriate. This is a personal matter they should have been personal with the public. It damages their credibility and shows their true character. Even conservatives (including a church friend of mine) are wondering why things just don't feel right. Be patient and watch for the next approval #'s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. it's emblematic
it perfectly illustrates their POV and their MO. it provides a window for people who can't wrap their minds around complex, distant issues. it's just too revealing. people do get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. What, no details?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. VIDEO of the Brand segment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. He still missed an important one.
Edited on Thu Feb-16-06 09:00 PM by Sparkly
He got Armstrong's change to an "eyewitness," but it was initially reported that she said Cheney et al did NOT know she called her pal -- she said she figured it was going to become news quickly anyway...

THAT is among the biggest lies of this whole thing, in my view. There is no WAY they decided together that she should break this story to a local paper. They'd have issued a VERY carefully-worded written statement, not sent some unknown person (and NOT an eyewitness) to phone a buddy and say whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. oh no I think you're wrong
Cheney chose Armstrong to make the report, once he realized it was going to get out anyway. and he brought Matalin in to craft the message. Armstrong was Cheney's handmaiden on this one. she did as she was asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Here's why I disagree.
It was way too sloppy. If this were planned, she'd have claimed from the start that she was an eyewitness (not that she saw people running and thought Cheney had a heart attack); she'd have claimed from the start that Cheney was in on the "decision" to phone the local paper; and she'd have claimed from the start that there was no alcohol involved.

I think she would have made a better handmaiden as a backup witness, not as the person to actually break the story and answer questions without their control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. It Doesn't Matter
Keith covered the Election FRAUD for a few weeks in 2004, and guess what happened? Still thinking?

Enjoy this little diversion. Story over. Next!

Cheney could kill a few people, and he would still get away with it. They are above the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC