Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Finally Congress questions Bush approval of sell-off of U.S. ports to UAE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:27 PM
Original message
Finally Congress questions Bush approval of sell-off of U.S. ports to UAE
Lawmakers seek White House review of port deal with Arab company

2/16/2006, 12:38 p.m. ET
The Associated Press
http://www.silive.com/newsflash/metro/index.ssf?/base/news-16/1140111851212010.xml&storylist=simetro

{snips}

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. lawmakers formally asked the Bush administration Thursday to reconsider its approval of a sale giving a company in the United Arab Emirates control over significant operations at six major American ports.

The lawmakers, including four senators and three House members, sharply criticized the UAE as inconsistent in its support of U.S. anti-terrorism efforts.

"Outsourcing the operations of our largest ports to a country with a dubious record on terrorism is a homeland security and commerce accident waiting to happen," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. "The administration needs to take another look at this deal."

The Bush administration defended its approval of the sale. A spokesman for the White House National Security Council, Frederick Jones, said Thursday that security implications of the deal were "rigorously reviewed."

The Associated Press reported Saturday that government-owned Dubai Ports World had won approval for the $6.8 billion deal from a secretive U.S. panel that considers security risks of foreign companies buying or investing in American industry.

full report: http://www.silive.com/newsflash/metro/index.ssf?/base/news-16/1140111851212010.xml&storylist=simetro


Hmm . . . Chuck Schumer again. Fighting for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is Rush talking about this?
I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MI Cherie Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. It's OK with him ...
I listened a few minutes yesterday ...

A caller was genuinely concerned about selling our port security to a foreign country ...

He said not to worry ... and said something about the scare in the 80's-90's about Japan & China buying up America.

We're still here, he said.

I had to turn it off.

How totally disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. This deal strikes me as having a registered sex offender for a baby
sitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's the comparison that came to me too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. More like . . .
. . . a registered sex offender who has already molested your child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who's weak on National Security???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Doesn't it cause you to pause...
If this * cabal actually is considering this, then they seriously don't have the countries best interest and saftey in mind.

This is about the money, this is treasonous!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well - THANK YOU for that.
Jeepers creepers, how much of an idiot to you have to be NOT to question this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. someone very much needs to lose their jobs.. over this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. exactly
this is the most underreported story of the year. I guess the UAE owns the media too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC