Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are we starting the '08 campaign a YEAR early?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:22 PM
Original message
Why are we starting the '08 campaign a YEAR early?
...by this time next year when the actual time comes..won't the majority of us be all burned out and divided all the more...I can't believe all this is starting a whole YEAR before it should be?! :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, I think we are going to see horrible things happen because of this too...
people can barely stand a single year let alone two full years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm already gettin' sick of it and it's only just begun....
...the infighting and flamebait....blah! :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Because the jousting always starts early...
This is the cash-grabbing phase, then we enter into the debate and primary phase. It costs a lot to run these campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's starting WAY too early this go 'round....
....and the money will be long dried up by Nov. '08 at this rate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. They gotta raise all that dough from the money guys.
Not that they would ever make any promises in return for the "donations".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Naw o'course not....
:sarcasm:

....as much changes...so much stays the same. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thats what they are hoping...
that we will be fighting each other and they can the MSM can pick our candidates...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. No need to hope...that's what's been happening.....
....and talk of primaries really chaps my ass because last time Kerry'd already gotten the nomination before our primary took place. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. That happened in my area...
and I voted for clark...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. ...and just to think
Didn't Robert Kennedy announce his bid for the '68 nomination in March of 1968?

Oh, for the days when our candidates weren't bought and paid for by big business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. for the people...by the people...doesn't even apply anymore...
....they're all out of touch with the common folk IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. All this does is
Distract people from the urgent issues we already have , that's my take on it .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Yep....sad and true...
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Our election system is so utterly fokked up, and in SO many ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. You can say that again.....
...and again and again!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Because arguing and fighting are so much FUN!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Arrrrgh..
:argh:

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. We should......
Stick to the tasks at hand, the war, health care, oil independence, the Bush crime family. There is a lot of business to take care of before the '08 elections.


Just say no to any DLCer.....no more same names in the White House.


This country deserves a break from Bush, Clinton anyway!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Hear HEAR....
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Dean did in 2003
He had formed an exploratory committee by this point. I think Edwards and Kerry had too, maybe a few others as well. This is how it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. I haven't actually seen it *work* yet....
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. I don't know what people want
They didn't like how the primary process drug out so far in 2000 that Al Gore didn't have time to launch an effective campaign. They didn't like IA & NH having so much influence in 2004 because it felt front-loaded. So now they want MORE primaries early, which will only mean money will have a bigger influence. If we shorten the primary season, that'll only give the people with money MORE of an edge. I think we've got a bunch of chronic malcontents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'm getting phone calls from the DNC and the local party already.
I know they need to raise funds, but jeebers, can't they give me a little break, just for awhile? My damn phone was ringing off the hook before the election, and I was kinda hoping for a reprieve from nonstop solicitation. Not that I answer it anymore...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. No reprive...
....non stop solicitations...bah!! :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
Edited on Sat Jan-20-07 05:48 PM by rocknation
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Oh well ...take this then...
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. The biggest fights will be right here on the DU.
I am already tired of the number of posts related to the primary candidates.

I wish that for the next 18 months we could have the Regular DU and an Alternate DU for those bullies and flamers who need attention. Already when I get here I have to scroll forever to find something interesting.

Not one word anyone says on DU will help me make a decision about a candidate because 99.9% of the posts are from thoughtless candidate promoters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. I wholeheartedly agree with you.....
....my cynicism doesn't need exacerbating this soon. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. GDP used to be for the primaries
Candidate threads weren't allowed in GD. There were also penalties assigned, to keep it from going too far overboard. I imagine the rules will be reinstated at some point in the next few months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
28. I just hope the admins open a GD-Primary forum soon. I'm already sick of candidate threads.
I don't give a rip about who might be president in 2008 if we don't get some major changes made in 2007 -- like stopping a war on Iran and restoring our Constitution, for example. I'd REALLY rather be discussing stuff like that.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Amen. A big AMEN. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. I am too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
30. Money. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
33. Cause the corporate media bosses love it when Dems are infighting
Edited on Sat Jan-20-07 06:45 PM by politicasista
and that's why they are still failing to hold Bush accountable and covering up Iraq and other serious issues that matter. Speaking of serious issues, what happened to Katrina? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. You say it's a year early.
That implies that you think the campaign shouldn't start until after the Iowa caucuses have already been held. That's obviously absurd, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you meant no one should campaign until the actual day of the caucuses.

Now how exactly would that work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
necso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
36. Apparently,
Edited on Sat Jan-20-07 08:33 PM by necso
the presidential "race" is getting a lot of play in the media.

And things that get play (lots of play, anyway) in the media show up here, often in direct proportion to how much media-play they're getting -- and especially for political topics, the degree to which they infest the punditocracy.

...

The presidential race is almost perfect for the media-mediocracy. It's like having the playoffs, the Superbowl, the Oscars, a horserace, a gossip-fest, a gutter-wallowing party, a reality show, a "talent"-show (with "critics"), endless street-brawls between fan-clubs, and an emotion-charged soap-opera/horror-movie -- all rolled up into one.

It's familiar ground; banal, yet full of consequences; and none of it taking any thinking or originality on the part of the media (who largely just repeat talking points anyway, knowingly or not -- heaven forfend that the people pay attention to the important issues or the actual state of our world and country).

Again, it's almost perfect for the media-mediocracy, who, if they had anything worth saying, would be trying to get paid extra for it.

...

As for so many entering the fray so early -- it's what's happening; one follows another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
37. because people need some hope
i'd rather look at this fine field of many talented candidates than just sit here and cry about * for 2 more years

when i see he is planning to pick our pockets to the bitter end it just makes me want to go drown myself, when i see that the future could hold such fine leaders as obama, hillary, or edwards, it's something better to think about

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InvisibleTouch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. I like that attitude!
It does seem early to me as well, but I don't think it's necessarily bad. I feel like we have such an important election coming up this next time around, that they have to get started early. Lay the groundwork, and then full steam ahead. By the time the actual Primaries come up, all our candidates will be household names, even to those who don't usually follow politics (keep in mind that not everyone is a junkie for this stuff like we are on DU ;) ). Informed voters cannot be a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
38. I was wondering the same thing. I thought it seemed awfully early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
40. I guess it beats talking about holding this criminal administration accountable.
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC