Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, I got in my Playboy with that Air Force Sgt. in there

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:04 AM
Original message
So, I got in my Playboy with that Air Force Sgt. in there
The one that got in hot water for doing the pictoral. Michelle Manhart.

And I can't figure out why the Air Force is so cranky.

There are 4 pictures of her in her uniform. One of her posing with a Minigun (6-barreled machine gun, 6,000 rounds a minute, totally awesome), one of her posing with a .50-caliber sniper rifle, and two of her screaming at recruits.

In each of those pictures, she is properly wearing the uniform of her nation's armed forces. Hat, boots, jacket properly buttoned, combat equipment properly worn.

Then there are eight pictures of her dressed somewhat more... informally. In none of those 8 pictures is she wearing any military gear. I don't think a sleeveless T-shirt counts, and I'm pretty sure the Air Force doesn't issue woodland-camo hot pants. Or translucent silk wraps. Or mesh thongs.

So, what's the problem with the USAF? It's not like she has her uniform shirt open and is flashing the camera, or has her BDU pants around her knees. And the free-weight bench she is posing on does not say "USAF" anywhere on it.

Is it because she's still wearing her dog tags?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenZoneLT Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's because she's nekkid
The grannies that police morality in our nation's armed forces faint at the sight of the unclad female form. She must be stopped.

C'mon, don'tcha geddit? Shooting people = morally good. Being photographed naked = Mortal sin.

BTW, my NCOIC knows her. Says she's kuh-razy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. All drill sergeants are crazy
Who else would want to deal with a new class of pale soft wussies every eight weeks?

Besides, under those digital cammies she looks pretty damn good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. As a former drill sergeant ....
Never mind, the boys in the white coats just drove up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. No pics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Didn't want to get a moderator spanking
Not sure if it's in the rules.

Besides, not my job to help you scratch your porn itch! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe the USAF
Doesn't support the troops, if you know what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, there is a reg prohibiting use of military status in off-duty
employment or making a profit from it. Further, the anti-servicewomen types are having a ball using this as an example of "any woman who joins the service is either a slut or lesbian".

Yes I know; it isn't logical or true, but when has common sense ever had anything to do with bigotry?

As a feminist I say she has every right to pose in the semi-buff. As a career servicewoman, I say "Sigh, thanks heaps dear. Here we go again."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. I see no problem with her posing in Playboy. I am sure that...
in the end it will provide some recreation for soldiers on very long tours of duty over there, and I don't think that's a bad thing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenZoneLT Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Except we're not allowed Playboy over here
They neither sell it at the PX anywhere in the Central Command area of operations, nor allow it to be sent from friends at home. You're also not supposed to view porn on your personal Internet account, if you're lucky enough to be on a FOB that has Hoochnet.

The closest thing to porn available in theater is Maxim, FHM and the like. Magazines for guys too stupid for Playboy and too timid for Hustler.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Sounds like you need somebody to burn you a CD
with some, um, items of a jpeg format on them. <wink wink, nudge nudge>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. The bottom line, no pun intended
is that the military cares more about a woman having her photo taken in or out of uniform than they do about our military women being raped by our own soldiers! Where is the investigation on that? Go figure. It is this kind of thing that makes me crazy! Kim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
12. Did you see her nipples? If yes, then how do we explain it to the children?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC