Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, "... trial was illegal."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 07:47 PM
Original message
Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, "... trial was illegal."
Coming from Gadhafi this is totally laughable.
Especially given the fate of the medical workers and the Libyan governments attempt to get money from the Bulgarian government.

snip from story:

Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi made an indirect appeal to save Saddam, telling Al-Jazeera television that his trial was illegal and that he should be retried by an international court.

on note: Whether anyone agrees with him on this issue, the Libyan governments record of human rights abuses and murders make his statement ring hollow (IMO).
Maybe he's trying to protect himself, should his government fall.

link:
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SADDAM?SITE=ILMO...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. The fact is the trial was illegal n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. ????????? ????????????????? ???????????????????????
??????????????? ??????????? ??????????????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is a fact - the trial was illegal. Gadhafi speaks the truth.
I will rehang a black drape tomorrow if Saddam dies tonight.

We are living a horror!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. "I will rehang a black drape tomorrow if Saddam dies tonight."
:rofl:

Seriously?

Oh come on, you don't have to cheer, that's downright nasty, but to hang a black drape? :crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. He should be tried in international court as well.
And he should be hanged before Saddam is hanged.

He is right, though, in that the trial was a goddamn farce to me - at least, in the sense that prosecutors should have dug into his relationship with the BFEE, Reagan, et. al., and brought the ENTIRE fucking house of cards down.

Of course, now that Saddam will be quickly killed, the BFEE doesn't have to worry about that as much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-29-06 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The face of the "international community" was the sanctions
imposed on Iraq that lead to a great deal of suffering and needless graft and corruption, with even France and Russia helping Saddam contra the provisions of the sanctions. The "international community" just reinforced, if it didn't actually augment, the control that Saddam had over people's lives.

Have the "international community" try Saddam? I think the point was made before the trial even started that the international community and the ICC had no credibility. You heard the international community just authorized the US to stay in Iraq another year, right?

Moreover, having the opportunity to carry out justice themselves was a point of honor; removing Saddam from their jurisdiction would be seen as humiliation by the Shi'ites and the Kurds, saying they're not quite human enough to conduct a trial. Cultural awareness said they needed to do it; now from the Sunni perspective, this is a travesty and an insult. Go figure; few Sunnis went to help the Kurds and the Shi'ites, but that was ok. There's the usual double-standard seen in all things tribal.

In other words, it's a lose-lose situation. I can't tell which would be worse, having an international court do it, or have it done locally. Ideally, the Sunnis would have done it; but that's not going to happen ("tribal", remember?).

I think they'll go through with it, but nary a bit of me would be surprised to hear there's a last minute compromise, some concession by a Sunni group in exchange for permanent imprisonment or exile. Eid is a primo chance for commutations and pardons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Aug 20th 2014, 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC