Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 07:52 PM by redacted
I own a brand design business and you are wrong.
Your premise is wrong on many fronts.
1. 18-49 is a a huge demographic. Saying that 18-49 is a target market is like saying white people are a target market. It's very un-targeted. 2. Print media is hardly dead or even ill. When new media comes along, companies have to differentiate their dollars -- but HOW they differentiate depends on the product/service and the TARGET MARKET. 3. The internet does not get "more eyeballs" than print or TV. Although in some demographics (24-45 yo tech saavy college educated coastal -types) it may get higher hit rates for some industries. But the fact is the internet has it's plusses and minuses for different types of businesses. 4. Other than his own book -- I cannot think of a single solitary instance where Obama is being used to sell a product. And the book is a ploy to get his political message out, and allow him an opptny to test the waters across the country in a safe way. His appearance on the MNF intro (was it Monday night?) did waayyy more for Obama than it did for football. It was probably something that Obama's people worked very hard to get placed.
So you are wrong. No company would try to make $$$ off of a candidate anyway -- too risky. Hey he could have a Gennifer Flowers in his closet. (Not saying he does, but that's the risk a comapny would be taking -- and said comapny would be left with many many t-shirts on their hands).
|