Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: How the Dems lost the rope-a-dope Alito hearings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:34 PM
Original message
NYT: How the Dems lost the rope-a-dope Alito hearings
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 12:58 PM by DeepModem Mom
Two Nominee Strategies. One Worked.
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK
Published: January 31, 2006


....As the last obstacles to confirmation faded away Monday, Democratic aides said their party had initially expected Judge Alito to live up to his reputation as "Scalito," suggesting a conservative firebrand in the mold of Justice Antonin Scalia. Failing to adjust to his meekness, Democratic aides admit they searched too hard for scandal in Judge Alito's past.

The White House, meanwhile, sought to take advantage of Judge Alito's low-key, almost shy demeanor to build sympathy for him. They say they succeeded beyond all expectations when Judge Alito's wife, Martha-Ann, walked out in tears from his confirmation hearings.

"Any time they are yelling, preaching, lecturing, and you are cool and calm and breathing deep, you are winning," the administration official said the White House team told Judge Alito. "What that means on television sets where the American people are watching this is, you look good and they look bad. It was the central operating premise."

Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, agreed. "It was a classic rope-a-dope," Mr. Manley said, referring to the boxing tactic of leaning against the ropes to let an opponent exhaust himself punching....

***

In an interview over the weekend, Mr. Kennedy acknowledged that the Democrats had invested too much in the Vanguard and alumni group matters at the expense of making a more coherent case against Judge Alito on substantive issues....


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/31/politics/politicsspecial1/31confirm.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. This Is Idiotic
How did Bush win? It's fucking simple. His party controls congress. There was no fucking strategy, no "rope a dope". Senate approval was practical a foregone conclusion, and up until very recently the vote was considered a mere formality by just about everyone, now all of a sudden there's something special and historic about it??? Man, what sickening propoganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I disagre -- This is a logical extension of Politics as Soap Opera
We have made politics into a giant Reality Show, in which personality overcomes substance. The Democrats should have been prepared for that. The GOP is really good at coming up with people whose philosophy and actions are radical right wing, but who seem innocuous or appealing.

There's no dount that Justice Alito came across as a "nice guy," unthreatening and calm and reasonable. If Alito had been an obnoxious asshole, his views and record would have gotten a lot more scrutiny. He may have the same views as Judge Bork, but he had a much more neutral and comforting personality.

This is unfortunately, a byproduct of a lessening of core issues as a focus of politics. That's where the Democrats keep getting "rope-a-doped." By nopt offering a clear alternative on a substantial level, our side has allowed politics to become more concerned with surface.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nope, It Wouldn't Have Mattered One Bit
Yeah, they put on the theatrics, but it was irrelevant. There was no way in hell the nomination was going to fail, regardless of the theatrics. The theatrics were just icing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Key ingredients - shilling media stacked daily with righties,
a gullible, incurious public, a greedy, disconnected, TV - hypnotized society. Things obviously need to get a whole lot worse before they can get better. This is horrifying, disappointing, but unfortunately, not surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thank You! Elected Democrats Need A Strategy To Deal W/Media
bitching about it isn't going to help
pretending there is no problem isn't going to help
sucking up to the mediawhores isn't going to help
waiting for some mythical future date when we can re-regulate the media isn't going to help
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is bullshit, we lost because only 25 Dems voted for the filibuster
or because we only got 42 votes against Alito

All this other stuff is making shit up. The only people who decided this were our elected representatives. We called them and told them to filibuster, but they ignored us. Public opinion was far against Alito, but the representatives ignored that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC