Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For discussion, two weird ideas.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:40 AM
Original message
For discussion, two weird ideas.
Edited on Wed Nov-22-06 12:42 AM by Jed Dilligan
1. Instead of abolishing the Electoral College, how about we actually have one? Replace celebrity, media-driven presidential campaigns with face-to-face ones, first in each census block group (say), then in the capital.

2. While we're at it, how about moving the capital to the geographic center of the country? That was originally the point of Washington. The High Plains could certainly use an infusion of modernity and centrality.

I'm sure there are great reasons not to do either of these things, but right now I'm not seeing them. Please discuss.

on edit: Here's where the capital would be.

http://www.roadsideamerica.com/geo/showMap.php?attractionNo=7032
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niallmac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. as for moving the capital to the Mid West...
I elaborate by suggesting their office buildings be built out of abandoned grain silos to
remind our reps on whose backs the economy of this great nation was built.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:46 AM
Original message
I'm always in favor of recycling what's on-site
So, sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. self delete
Edited on Wed Nov-22-06 12:46 AM by Jed Dilligan
dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. that should be required for ALL elected officials & school administrators...
they can't put up a new building if there are existing ones that could do the job adequately, and in the case of K-12 districts, the administration offices should be in the shittiest building in the district, then once they fix it up for themselves (as they inevitably will do), they should be moved to the NEW shittiest building, and their prior office returned to use as a school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. what's geographic center of all 50? Even politicians don't deserve to be subject to the flat states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:47 AM
Original message
Up in the Dakotas I think
Let me check...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. they need it. Didn't they start the homestead act up there again to try to lure people in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I don't know about restarting the Act.
The 1902 Reclamation Act was an attempt to revive the Homestead Act, but since the acreage limitation was "unenforceable" it gave us agribiz as we know it today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. self delete
Edited on Wed Nov-22-06 12:47 AM by Jed Dilligan
dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. The high plains, geographic center?

Hardly fits the east-west center from the east coast to the west coast of Hawaii. It would be somewhere in California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Surprisingly, not according to CLUI,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well I was just folding over part of a shower curtian map

which is flat so of course that create problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GymGeekAus Donating Member (285 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Uh.
At that same link...
The article is quick to point out, however, that none of the designated "centers" are truly precise or objectively determined:

"Many variables exist when calculating the center of a land mass as large as the United States, and selective criteria and methods can be used, from the selection of different map projections, to defining the periphery of the shape with varying degrees of accuracy."

In fact, scientists at the Geodetic Survey have stopped calculating "centers" due to the imprecise nature of the task. Oscar S. Adams, Senior Mathematician for the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, even wrote, "Since there is no definite way to locate such a point, it would be best to ignore it entirely...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC