|
Edited on Tue Nov-21-06 01:15 PM by Lexingtonian
Look at what is going on Washington as a matter of political process. From early summer to Election Day the elections were paramount and Bush would out of capaign necessity utterly reject any advice, and because of such a rejection and his infallibility thang (aka 'ego') it would be harder to get anything done later.
Right after the election the Group anticipated either Republican gloating and rejection of any advice, or a Democratic win and Republicans doing what they are doing now- the Kubler-Ross grieving process of painfully and slowly manifesting and breaking down their denial, bitterness, and depression, which are all evasions and clinging to delusions.
Plus, you can't really get any serious policy changes through a lame duck session in Congress anyway. November through January wer going to be dominated by small managerial business and internal status wrangling. Rather a lot of business- forming of changing of an elite consensus, really- happens at Christmas parties and people in the apparatus getting enough free time to review their situation and options and trends.
By ones and twos they're going to corner Dubya at a Christmas party and say, 'Look, George, the Iraq thing is just over. Maliki isn't worth it and doesn't care, and he can't last. When he falls you're looking at resigning. Democrats have you over a barrel now and will flay your ass worse than they did Nixon's and ruin us all if you keep it up. Dump it off on the UN a.s.a.p.'
And a month later, around Inauguration Day, they'll release a "report" with a gussied up and marketable, euphemistic, and pious-sounding version of the same, to great fanfare.
|