Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should John Murtha Withdraw His Nomination In Light Of The Recent Revelations?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:29 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should John Murtha Withdraw His Nomination In Light Of The Recent Revelations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. what recent revelations? The video that showed him refusing a bribe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The 26 year old video?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Hannity was having a field day with that video yesterday.
Leave it to him to bring up a 26-year-old video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. but he refused the bribe money...
is that what hannity is mocking him for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
37. He asked that it be given to him via a back door. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #37
49. the back door was "invest in the district"..
hardly illegal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Influence peddling...hardly the right thing to do.
MURTHA: You can buy insurance if you want to. But I'm gonna tell you somethin'. To me, insurance is investing in my goddamn district... and doing this goddamn, you know this, this is, to me, a big goddamn insurance policy is doing business in my district. And I'm gonnna tell you something, there's an article in the Bulletin the other day, you might have seen it Howard, "Jack Murtha Deals in the District," and that's right. You know, and I want, I want this guy to spend money in my district. I want this connection in my goddamn district. I'm delighted to do business with him, and do every goddamn thing I can within bounds, you know, so I don't get myself in jail, in order to get him into the country and whatever needs to be done. But I've I gotta know uh...the details, and when I say the details I've got to know when he wants to come, I've got to know how many in the family, I've got to know, you know, a lot of goddamn things....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recent?
Are you like 600 years old or something? Only Methuselah would think this is recent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Wow
Before you speak investigate...

John Murtha called the soon to be voted on Democratic anti-corruption bill "crap" and said he's only supporting it because "Nancy wants it."...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. But he is supporting it, right?
That is the content of your post if I read correctly. So what's the big deal. He doesn't think it is a huge deal but he'll vote for it because the party wants it. Perhaps he is more concerned about the war and is going to focus his efforts there while others deal with other issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
27. care to provide the exact quote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Asinine
Correct....they republicans are trying to get the public to believe that the democrats are as crooked as they are....they SHOULD show the video and they SHOULD tell the public...he DID NOT accept the bribe.

And then if any network repeats that he is a crook and involved in the Abscom sting I think he should sue them. Wouldn't it be nice if the democrats had a say over what goes in the news again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. No, he should withdraw it because....
he's out of step with the majority of the rank and file on the issue of women's right to control their own bodies. Those 0% ratings from NARAL and Planned Parenthood are enough reason for me not to support him as Speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. There Has To Be A Better Choice Than Murtha And Hoyer
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I could probably list 20 or 30 better choices...
off the top of my head if pressed on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Our Opinions Don't Count
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 02:47 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. What chaps my ass...
is that the first woman Speaker is actually supporting his caveman ass. Good grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. This Is A Touchy Subject Here...
People here are enthralled with him because he opposes the war...


I can oppose the war, support women's right, be for clean government, and even walk and chew gum at the same time.

I don't want to be like the corrupt GOPU with a D after my name. I aspire and hope our Democratic leaders aspire to something better and more noble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Gotta admit I'm also really tired...
of hearing him refered to as the first Democrat to stand up against the war. :eyes: He voted for the IWR and then changed his mind later. There were plenty of Dems who deserve a helluva lot more credit for voting against the IWR and being against this war from the very beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. There's Also Some Blindness Toward Another Candidate Who Voted For IWR And Now Opposes It.
I'm not a big fan of selective indignation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I know what you mean
While I welcome anyone who has changed their minds about this war, I don't like them being portrayed as heroes over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. What's Strange Is This Candidate Voted Against The First Gulf War But Voted For This One.
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 03:07 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
It was a purely "political vote"...

At least in the first Gulf War we were fighting Saddam because he stole a country...

This place makes my head hurt...

It's not about right and wrong... It's about who's oxe is being gored...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. He had the "voice & background" to deliver the message for Dems but
I'm concerned about the ABSCAM and Earmarking with his brother the lobbyist for Defense Contractors. I'm hoping to see more detail about the Earmarking and who he gave defense contracts to, but I hope he withdraws so that he doesn't undermine Pelosi's position.

We Dems don't need Murtha bringing us down after he propped us up and his strong stand on the War helped us win.

He needs to withdraw. Nancy can find someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NCarolinawoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
41. Yes, he's knee-deep in the Military Industrial Complex
I have an idealistic dream that we can tackle this problem someday. Murtha, in a position of power, would be an impediment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Yes especially since he wants to end their little pet project
called the Iraq War.. I am sure the Republicans are ready for this... I think this war has profoundly changed Murtha. I believe he will do everything he can to bring the soldiers home and if he can do that, well more power to him....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Hi Sam Francis 1964!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Murtha=Nixon
Wow! The things you learn from Newbies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obnoxiousdrunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Sam isn't it
time to get ready for the war on Christmas ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
29. I think you are SERIOUSLY uninformed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Gunslinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. If 1981 is recent, and it is wrong to reject bribes..
Non story 25 years ago................Non story today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
28. Recent? Pulease. You bought the winger talking points.
He was innocent. He refused the bribe. Get it right damnit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. Is This A Winger Site?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. So whats wrong with that?
I havent read the bill, but if he thinks its just a crappy bill then maybe it is. Maybe it doesnt go far enough in Murthas opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. That's Not What He Said On Hardball Minutes Ago When He Had The Chance...
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. So what did he say?
Did he say why he didnt like it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
30. no, not because of a NON-SCANDAL from 1980
But because he is not progressive enough for me. Maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
31. He should stick it out just to thwart the smear campaign. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
32. You need to change "Revelations" to "Swiftboating"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
33. What recent revelations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. This
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I'd have to know more besides he thinks it's "total crap"
What is his reasoning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. He doesn't think the BILL is total crap
he thinks that it's crap that we have to deal with this instead of real issues like Iraq and Global Warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. exact quote please! how about the context!!!
Who heard him say this???

DETAILS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
39. ABSOLUTELY! POSITIVELY!
Absolutely positively NOT!!!!!

John Murtha is an AMERICAN HERO who SPOKE THE TRUTH TO POWER when it was not very popular to do so!!!!

It would be an act of COWARDICE AND BETRAYAL to withdraw his nomination!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. I agree, Murtha will NOT back down to swift boaters
that is the difference between him and Kerry, no offense to Kerry, but he came out to little when they attacked him, they won't be able to do that with Murtha


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Are They Swiftboaters?
http://www.citizensforethics.org/index.php


And how do we distinguish between legitimate criticism and illegitimate criticism...

Accusing your accusers of malice is an old tactic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. excellent point, and I agree it is a narrow line
What I was implying is that Murther is not shy to defend him self. The question remains is he justified or not?

The attractive feature of Murtha is his position on the Iraq war, but that in itself does not exonerate him if he did something wrong

We are NOT like the republicans


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. I Hate These Debates Because They Become Ad Hominem And Emotional
Not you...

I'm reminded of a line from an old Public Enemy song.

Something about judging people by the same standards.

The question every person here must ask themselves about any politician. Would we judge him differently if he had a (R) after his name...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
51. What "recent" Revelations?
There is no there.... he did nothing wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC