Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are the media going to be falling all over the Democrats now,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:52 AM
Original message
Are the media going to be falling all over the Democrats now,
fawning & courting favor?

In a word, no.

Their job is to mold public opinion, not to express it. To mold it in specific ways, namely the ways that their owners want it molded. Pro-Capitalist, pro-Republican, unthinking, unreflective, and uncomprehending. Their assignment is to do their part to return the Republicans to power. After a "decent interval" of mourning the tragedy that has befallen the Greed Class, they will start in sniping, carping and kvetching at every move a Dem makes. The Swiftboat fleet is being remodeled into an armada of cruise ships for the corporate media right now, as we speak. New memes are being hammered out in the caves of the trolls. The People don't really want Democrats. They don't know what's good for them. The Dems only won because they ran as conservatives. Yada, yada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PFunk Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Only if the fairness doctrum is brought back in full force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E Ve Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. You are absolutely right, but, will the dems sell their soul
to keep power? This is what they usually do, so, no real progressive changes are made. Now the corporations will just buy dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
W.E.B. Du Bois Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. What would you have the Democrats do then? (nt).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E Ve Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Get all the money out of campaigns. Do not allow corporations to
Edited on Sun Nov-12-06 11:00 AM by E Ve
make donations. Public funding would change everything. People from all walks of life, poets, visionaries, professors and so on all could run for public office. This would be the best thing Democrats could do for America if they really want to do something for the people and not their special interest groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. You know I wonder if it would be something we all should push for
with the effort needed to succeed. After all it would be in the better interest of all involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
W.E.B. Du Bois Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. Could you tell me exactly how that would work?
What are the qualifications for getting public funding? What happens if there is huge demand for public funding, so much so that the public cannot get much information on any one candidate? How much taxes should be levied to fund this project?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E Ve Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Found this at www.washclean.org
www.washclean.org

Politics As Usual

Imagine you are a candidate running for the Washington state legislature. With the pressure to raise increasingly vast sums of money to run your campaign, who are you most likely to listen to: a drug company that gives you $30,000 or a person in your district who can give you $10?

And when the time comes to vote on a prescription drug bill, will your list of campaign donors have any influence on the way you vote?

"In the vast majority of cases, the biggest recipients of interest group money voted the way their donors wanted."
— Tacoma News Tribune, July 2003

The problem is not the fault of the politicians, but the way the system is set up. The influence of big money drowns out the voices of ordinary citizens.


We Can Do Better Than This

Imagine a government that listens to your voice and responds to the concerns of families, children, workers, and small businesses as much as it listens to well funded special interests.

Imagine a campaign where candidates spend their time talking about issues with constituents, rather than making phone calls to raise money.

Imagine an election where people not tied to big money sources can run for public office and have a real chance of winning.

Public campaign funding can bring new life to elections, increasing diversity and voter turnout. In fact, it's already working in Maine and Arizona.

"The campaign was different because I didn't have to fund raise. The real difference will be in serving, simply by having no encumbrance from private money."
—Maine Senator Lynn Bromley


How Does Public Campaign Funding Work?

To qualify for this voluntary program, candidates collect a signature and a small donation (for example, $5 to $25) from a set number of individuals in their district. They agree to accept no other private funding. They then receive a set amount of public campaign money, based on the average cost of campaigns for that position in previous years.


Cost

There is often a question of what the cost of Public Financing would be to the tax payers. We have done a complete analysis and estimate that the cost would be $3.36 per Washington resident per year. Since our electoral process is such a vital part of our democracy, it seems like quite a bargain to insure that our elected representatives put their constituents first.

Success Stories

In November 2002 in Arizona, Janet Napolitano became the first Governor to be elected under a clean money election law. As of 2004, 10 out of 11 statewide offices are held by those running with public funds, as are 58% of the seats in the Arizona House and 23% of the Senate.

In the state of Maine, the shift has been even more dramatic, with 77% of the House and 83% of the Senate composed of legislators who used the clean money system. Both states passed full public funding initiatives in the 1990's. Participation in both states has been equally Republican and Democrat. Minor party candidates have participated as well.

In North Carolina, public financing has been approved for candidates to the Supreme Court. In New Mexico, candidates for the Public Regulation Commission have the option to run on public funds.

"It's a good way of giving government back to the people - It lets people who are not well connected run for the legislature."
— Maine Senator Ed Youngblood


What's Happening Here

Here in Washington, we are building a statewide network of supporters to work for reform, and securing endorsements and assistance from key organizations and leaders. We are advocating a strong bill modeled after the Maine and Arizona laws, and supporting legislators willing to pass such a law for all state offices. If the legislature does not respond, then we plan to bring an initiative to the voters.

We have also been working on repealing the state-wide ban on public financing of elections at both the local and state levels. Senate Bill 6221, our local public financing bill, did pass in the 2006 legislative session, but it did not pass the House of Representatives, due to an extremely shortened session.

Read the entire update for this year's session.

What You Can Do

Sign up on our mailing list to support this movement to restore democracy.

Ask local leaders or organizations to endorse the concept of public financing of campaigns.

Send a donation to help us get the message out. Please make checks payable to Washington Public Campaigns. (Donations are not tax deductible.)

Call your state legislators. Let them know your concerns and tell them you support public campaign funding. Ask them what their views are and what they will do about campaign funding. Let us know who and when you called.

Let us know of any groups where we could send a speaker, or events where we could set up an information table.

Spread the word. Talk with your family, friends, and neighbors.

Join our working group if you want to be more involved in our effort. Contact us by mail or by email at [email protected] .

Let us know what you would like to do in the future: be a speaker, raise funds, help with mailings, help with phone calls, staff a table at an event, collect signatures on an initiative.

Return to Top of Page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I think this last 6 years have been a wake up call for all of us
elected officials as well as the rest of us good people, ie Dems.

to DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. You have the wrong party. Dems will not sell out with us at the backs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E Ve Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I have hope. There are some amazing Dems. Kucinich comes to
Edited on Sun Nov-12-06 11:36 AM by E Ve
mind. But, the money is the problem. Even if the Dem wanted to speak truth to power he would lose just for that because the monied and powerful would ridicule him. Just look at Kerry. He once was brave and spoke truth to power. We loved him for it. But, this time around he had to sell his soul to get the corporate and party backing. No more anti-war hero. If the elections were cleaned up more people could get the facts right and start voting for their own interests.

I think maybe with the information age we could really change things. But, we will have to fight like hell to beat the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Hi E Ve!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
W.E.B. Du Bois Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fox News has already started their attacks on the Dems
I saw one headline that was so pathetic: "Democratic Agenda: $3 a gallon?" How about a different headline: "Bush = ass rapist?" Why not use that one? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. We run this Democracy. We will not let the soviet style bullies run us.
It's time to dig out the BushCo roots and let them wither.The election was just the foot in the door.

The repubs still hold the keys.Time to take them back, so the people can be represented in common sense according to Our Constitution.

This is our Country. You, Me, and all the Others who love her.

America is the dream and we are the builders of that dream.

Time to roll up our sleeves and build!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. I see it differently
People in the media have certain political leanings themselves, they form their own opinions. They are also driven to report controversial stories to get ratings, this plays into the repuke game of smear politics. I think that since most big name media personalities make big bucks, they tend to favor less progressive tax policies and that affects their view on Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sure,
look at the two Democrats Russert had on today.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
E Ve Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Who were they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. To discuss the Democratic victory - John McCain and Joe Lieberman
I shut it off as sson as he announced his guests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. .
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wholetruth00 Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yes, but only to make sure you know they are really conservatives in disguise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. Their job is to deliver a profit to their owners or the shareholders
If their owners don't like leftists, naturally, there's going to be some level of pressure on editors and journalists to favor rightwingers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. Sherrod Brown & Bernie Sanders were doing media ownership hearings 6 yrs ago
Edited on Sun Nov-12-06 11:53 AM by TheBorealAvenger
With the presumption that there already was a problem. Now both congressmen are in the Senate. Busting up the media monopoly is an issue with broad public support. Even the NRA is against media monopolies.

edit:you ought to put your post into your journal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syncronaut Seven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-12-06 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. No, The media will be there with D-9's to backfill the mass graves.
Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC