Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Filibuster by all means, but not without the votes!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kynn Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:14 PM
Original message
Filibuster by all means, but not without the votes!
As much as I want to see the Alito nomination to get filibustered, I fervently hope the Democrats don't do it without having the votes for it. It would only make their reputation as the Keystone Kops of Kongress all the more unshakeable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. too late for that, Kerry said he will attempt it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. how in hte hell can you filibuster without votes. what are you talking
about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Tea is where it belongs - in the Harbor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chapel hill dem Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tin foil hat time: Kerry's Dem Pres opponents are setting him up n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Setting him up how? By making him a hero to the Wacko left?
If he fails, it will be because they caved. How would that hurt Kerry especially when the overwhelming majority of the Democratic Caucus supports the filibuster? The Democratic Senator who votes against us is committing political suicide not Senator Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chapel hill dem Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. Just an observation, but I think that the 2008 nomination contest will
focus on who can bring the Democrats together and lead the Party as well as the Nation. Those Democrat Presidential hopefuls may point to this and say that Kerry could not rally his fellow Democratic Senators to reject cloture.

I may be paranoid, but I see a lot of agendas playing out within our Party on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigBearJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Sometimes doing what's right has to transcend politics
as one poster here wrote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting that you would use a 'KKK' acronym to describe Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kynn Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. purely koincidental... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. you cant have a filibuster without the votes. tell me what you
mean when you say, filibuster, but not without votes. what are you talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Calling to vote against cloture, that is what the OP means.
And I am happy they did it, with or without the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. i see. ty. a vote against cloture is a wussy afraid vote for filibuster
i will take it. how about you mass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. i wont demean the vote against cloture so. nah it isnt a chicken vote
for filibuster. for repugs to vote against cloture would be mighty bave of them. i would totally respect it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Voting against cloture is what you need to do to have a filibuster
You need 41 people either abstaining or voting against cloture, so by all means, we need this cloture vote to happen or there is 0 chances to have a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. 41 for filibuster, looks we dont have, yet.... 60 for yes vote on
cloture. were we are asking they not get, 60 cloture to shut it down. they are seperate of each other in a way. can have 59 for cloture, and only 39 for filibuster, and you still get filibuster, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Exactly - They need 60 votes for cloture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. Cloture ends debate/discussion. It takes 60 yea votes to end debate
(yea on cloture) or 41 nay votes to keep the debate open on the floor (nay on cloture). Leaving the debate open means a final vote on the nomination can't be held. Debate has to be closed to allow the nomination vote to the floor.

As was mentioned, old-style filibustering - the endless speeches - was a way to block a cloture vote from ever being presented - debate not only remained open, but cloture was not presented for a vote. The Senate dropped the practice and relies on cloture, with a 60/41 benchmark, to handle the battle about a final vote on a nomination.

Hope that makes sense. That's my understanding of the process. It's going to be an interesting day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
31. The filibuster is already happening...
Edited on Sun Jan-29-06 07:14 PM by mikelewis
A filibuster is a plan to hold debate open indefinitely, it's already in place. What we are doing now is trying to convince and inspire 41 Senators to support the filibuster. A cloture vote is a vote to cut off debate on an issue. The Republicans need to have 60 votes to end debate. If 41 of our Senators vote no or abstain from voting, the debate continues indefinitely; effectively killing the issue. If this happens, the Republican majority plans to change the 60 vote rule to a simple majority vote. That's the Nuclear Option.

My guess is that Sen. Kerry already had the votes before he announced and this may be the Senators simply riling up support by feigning indecision. They need to be standing in front of millions of pissed off Americans before they face the Nuclear Option. I think the Republicans are getting the idea that maybe a Nuclear war in the Senate might not be such a popular idea. I think we are going to block Alito's nomination.

And this also might help a few of our Democratic Senators win over quite a few Conservative voters. What Conservative would vote against Robert Byrd now? He lives in a Conservative State and his opposition to the filibuster just won him another term. If the filibuster holds like I think it will, we don't need to send a dime to Sen. Byrds reelection campaign. He's locked. Mary Landrieu just lost New Orleans in Katrina which was a Democrat stronghold. She has to win over conservative voters to stay alive. We don't need her vote so hopefully this will earn her enough to survive in November. I think Ben Nelson falls into this catagory too but I'm not sure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I dont know if I am as optimistic as you are concerning the votes
but anyway, it was the right thing to do if only on principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Politicians don't live on principles, they live on votes...
They are not going to throw away their base right before an election. Sen. Kerry stood up because the Leadership allowed him too. Both Hilary and Kennedy wholeheartedly endorse the filibuster and they sent Kerry because of his name recognition in the last election. He did get more votes than George Bush after all. This is Kerry's grand FUCK YOU to George Bush. Just sit back and enjoy it. But call too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. you are an optimist mike
i have really been enjoying listening to you the last week. thanks. have had turks on for two days now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. koincidental?
Sorry, but this reminds me of my dear governor a little too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. funny how that was your last post here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. It was a parting shot. (The K in coincidental.)
Most of us apparently didn't understand that.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kynn Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. huh? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. huh? ....... Duh!!!!!
:rofl: are you really that mentally challenged, don't get what you said or just Mis-informed? Or a 'Valley Girl'? Which is it? :shrug: Nothing Personal mind you, just having some fun, while your here. Peace, hope you can deal with the truth some day ...... and not the spin. Weeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!! Are you Christian? Just curious? What did the Bible say about the truth? "Through Deceit They Refuse To Know Me" ..... If your not Christian I apologize ..... Agnostic that's okay too, big tent here. It no matter! You started this thread at 3:14 pm, and your only other post here is 5 hours later. Deep too ..... huh? :rofl: See ya! But peace, always, peace. :)

Note: nice try at the kick when you got home but your gonna have to try harder with this crowd. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-30-06 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
43. klever ...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Thanks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Pessimism
will get you no where.

NO SURRENDER !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. actually no, that's the way the GOP want you to see it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nope, we have to stand for what we believe.
All the GOP hopes is that we continue to be wishy-washy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why don't you check the archives before you post.
You're three days behind the times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. How 'bout you figure out what a filibuster is before posting about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Two flamebait threads in 3 minutes - I think you may be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Might be ....
.... :rofl: as if anyone of us "nutballs" would change what we do, think,
or say because of one posting on DU. Teaching a worm to throw a
fastball would be easier.

BTW is flame bait 1 or 2 words?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. It makes one wonder what Pukes think the word FILIBUSTER means.
Maybe they think it's like shenanigans on South Park, and they don't want anybody to get smacked with brooms?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
27. Have we been infiltrated?
So many posts saying we should give up and give in. Gosharooney, let's all lay down so the Republicans can walk on us. Wouldn't want their dainty feet to touch the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I posted a thread last night about that and it got locked...
this one is still open though...

wake up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jarnocan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
36. Saying that can kill it
Don't take a chance because... there are some who maybe wavering in their resolve- either way- there will be some powerful discussions and ongoing activism. We should not just give up on our rights and democracy because it might not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
38. Don't worry about it.
We'll be fine. Better Keystone Kops than Republican Goose-steppers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-29-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
40. FILIBUSTER FOR THE TRUTH !!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe this way it will make the American public wake up to the FACT that 'not all is well in D.C.' or with our Country! Dammit enough SPIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Peace. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC