Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Virginia & Montana: We had better have lots of lawyers on hand

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:36 PM
Original message
Virginia & Montana: We had better have lots of lawyers on hand
It looks to me like the Repugs are trying to put the fix on the counts in those states. We all know they will do anything to keep power....we better not let our guard down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. You are absolutely right. The Media would have called this for Dems long ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxhud Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:40 PM
Original message
Virginia's election results site is just now starting to update for Provisional Ballots
40 Outstanding precincts have been added, in the various localities, to represent the conditional ballots.

http://sbe.virginiainteractive.org/nov2006/l_02.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxhud Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Virginia's election results site is just now starting to update for Provisional Ballots
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 04:59 PM by jaxhud
140 Outstanding precincts, or so, have been added, in the various localities, to represent the conditional ballots.

http://sbe.virginiainteractive.org/nov2006/l_02.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Where did you get that from, or is it an assumption? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxhud Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The data is on the Virginia Election Results website.
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 05:01 PM by jaxhud
"Conditional Ballot" Precincts were just created in most of the localities and vote counts are starting to come in. They're very small numbers so far. I doubt it will make any appreciable difference in the final count.

http://sbe.virginiainteractive.org/nov2006/l_02.htm

(If you click on "details" for a Locality, then click on "View Results by Precinct" under the Senate race, you'll see the newly created "conditional ballot" precinct, and the associated vote count)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. given the antics of the last few years, I would be surprised if we didn't
In fact, I imagine both states will bear an uncanny resemblance to national conventions of the ABA before the day is out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good to keep an eagle eye but....nah...we've got both of these. They can do
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 04:58 PM by featherman
essentially nothing. Don't forget both Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004 had Republican administrations that abetted the theft. Both of these state have DEM Governors who will not turn a blind eye to those shenanigans in these cases. Enjoy our victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. looks like Montana is safe...more $ for VA
Secretary of State: Burns can’t ask for recount; margin of victory too large
Edited on Wed Nov-08-06 03:36 PM by maddezmom
By JENNIFER McKEE IR State Bureau
HELENA - Montana's top electioneer said Wednesday morning that barring a ''dramatic change'' Democrat Jon Tester is the winner of the hotly contested U.S. Senate race and Republican Sen. Conrad Burns does not have the footing to ask for a re-count.

Brad Johnson, Montana's secretary of state, which oversees elections in Montana, said Wednesday morning that election results reported by the Associated Press and this newspaper are generally tracking with his official results.

Those figures show Tester with a slim 2,848 vote lead over Burns, with all 867 voter precincts reporting.

Montana law allows for voter re-counts in certain situations. In this case, the state itself would have launched n and paid for n a re-count if the margin between Tester and Burns fell below about 1,000 votes. Burns could have petitioned for a recount n and potentially paid the cost of it n if the margin between the two fell below about 2,000 votes, Johnson said.

link: http://www.helenair.com/articles/2006/11/08/helena/000aamargine.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC