Stevendsmith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 12:01 PM
Original message |
| Would a Dem House be hobbled by a Rethug Senate and White House? |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-30-06 01:00 PM by Stevendsmith
Now, I know the Senate is within reach as well, but I'm curious to know how a Rethug Senate and White House could check the power of a Democrat-controlled House -- and I'm thinking mainly in terms of the persuit of justice for Rethug foreign policy and domestic crimes.
|
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Yes. But so will the republicans. |
greeneyedboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. you know what they say about looking a gift House in the mouth. |
|
oh wait, that's "horse", not "house". never mind.
in any case, i'll take any victories we can get, and worry about the complications later. there's plenty of down side to losing, as we all know.
GOTV!
|
bullimiami
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. they surely could have investigations and subpoena power. |
|
they can also refer criminal charges to the justice department.
they will be hobbled more on legislation than on investigation and of course you can impeach but it takes a big vote in the senate to convict.
|
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. Yes, but hopefully the reports of the investigations will be public |
|
and result in a wave of national resentment which changes the existing calculus.
|
Stevendsmith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 9. I like the sound of that! (n/t) |
Touchdown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Actually the House can hobble the other two. |
|
It takes 3 to tango in the US. Stop this extremist agenda in it's tracks!
|
Totallybushed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Senate would never convict an impeached President. Secondly, if the House wanted to accomplish any of its aims other than impeachment, it would have to work with a Rethug Senate. That means compromise. Finally, if the President and his accomplices are not removed from office, they are still in a position to get payback on House members who have offended them.
So, yeah.
|
Gloria
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. Well, it would have to be treated as an opportunity to CAMPAIGN |
|
non-stop until 2008 on all the crap the Repugs have done and will try to do.
|
cautiouslywaiting
(243 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
But we could keep them from getting any more of their fascist agenda passed.
|
WilliamPitt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-30-06 12:45 PM by WilliamPitt
The idea for 11/7 isn't to take over completely, but to put up a wall between the White House and the congressional rubber-stamp party that has been going on since 2002.
Oh, and subpoena power.
|
Stevendsmith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. Subpoena power alone makes me giddy with excitement! |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-30-06 01:06 PM by Stevendsmith
Are you confident the Dems would use this power in a vigorous and effective manner? I'm not so sure. I've seen no evidence that the Dems have grown a spine. Then again, we know that Conyers and Waxman will be given new powers!
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-30-06 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. Judges are President, Senate alone. Thats what worries me. For the rest... |
|
a democratic house would be able to subpeona and would keep a republican senate in check.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Jun 19th 2013, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message |