Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's the spin I've been given on "stay the course"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 03:27 PM
Original message
Here's the spin I've been given on "stay the course"
You are hearing what you want to hear because you are bias in your views. Stay the course in Iraq how they originally meant it was that we stay in Iraq and we keep the fight on terrorism, you and others were wrongly interpreting it as fighting it the same way.

whitehouse.gov

Q Is there a change in the administration "stay the course" policy? Bartlett this morning said that wasn't ever the policy.


MR. SNOW: No, the policy -- because the idea of "stay the course" is you've done one thing, you kick back and wait for it. And this has always been a dynamic policy that is aimed at moving forward at all times on a number of fronts. And that would include the international diplomatic front. After all, the Iraq compact is something we worked out with the Iraqis before visiting the Prime Minister in Baghdad earlier this year.


So what you have is not "stay the course," but, in fact, a study in constant motion by the administration and by the Iraqi government, and, frankly, also by the enemy, because there are constant shifts, and you constantly have to adjust to what the other side is doing.


I think you also see much more aggressive efforts on the part of the Iraqi government because the Prime Minister understands the importance -- the vital importance of reconciliation. The third reconciliation conference will be taking place next -- is it next week, week after next -- on the 4th. He is working on the reconciliation front. There has been considerable, and continues to be, action on the economic front. And obviously, we're continuing to cooperate in security. That is not a "stay the course" policy.

**************************************************************

So, what's the rebuttle you'd give to this line of shit? Also, if you have a story on someone elses "spin" post it, I'd like to see what we're all hearing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. We have our own Baghdad Bob--the one and only TONYYYY SNoWW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL!
I still like to call him snowjob. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. I'm confused: is the new slogan
"cut the course" or "stay and run"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. no need for a rebuttal to this kind of nonsense
anyone who swallows this load of shit either won't listen to or won't understand any rebuttal you offer anyway...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. why is it, every time
I get someone who basically says "no need" I alway interpret this as the dems don't need to fight, that people will see eventually. Well, for over ten years now, that particular tactic hasn't worked.

Please don't take that personally, it's I just get fed up with those types of statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. that's not what I said at all
I said it would be a waste of time to refute this.

Not because "people will see eventually".

Quite the contrary.

People that believe this will never see. Ever.

They are too stupid, too bigoted, and too arrogant to know they are being used by the Right Wing.

And you won't change their minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Snow got lots of props for being verbally facile . . .
Somewhat charismatic, etc., particularly in comparison with his predecessor, Mediocrity McClellan.

But Snow is so full of shit that he squishes when he walks, and I wonder whether a straightforward but unconvincing liar, like McClellan, didn't serve Bush's needs better than a flim-flam man who makes you want to reach through the TV screen and throttle him (it's not as if the administration has any shortage of the type).

Having yet *another* snake oil salesman in the White House only drags Schimpanski's credibility down further. (Yep, they screwed up another personnel decision, because it's clear that Snow is doing a "heckuva job.")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. How can you possibly debate these fools over this?
Edited on Tue Oct-24-06 03:46 PM by gatorboy
I mean, it's pretty widely known that "Stay the Course" is what they've said 24/7 for the past couple of years. You couldn't turn on the TV or check the news without hearing it.

Anyone that believes that this was never said is too far gone to argue with over this. They'll believe anything the administration tells them.

And THAT'S pretty scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. they are not denying that they have said
"stay the course" they're trying to debate the meaning of "stay the course"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. What the definition of "is" is?
Edited on Tue Oct-24-06 04:12 PM by gatorboy
:rofl:

C'mon, it doesn't matter what you tell'em. They're not going to swallow anything Dubya hasn't ordered them to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't understand your quibble.
Are you saying 'stay the course' doesn't mean 'hold out to the end', contrary to what most dictionaries say? Or that * and his team obviously couldn't have been aware of the usual meaning the phrase had until maybe 5 years ago? (Perhaps longer, in some circles.)

I've argued that's precisely what * meant the phrase to mean last year and the year before: "stay the course: To hold out or persevere to the end of a race or challenge." (www.dictionary.com)

"To stay with the same course of action" seems to be the newer meaning, if the Oxford English Dictionary is any guide. "Course" mean "race course", and the expression referred to horses that crapped out before the end of the race--it's one thing to come in last, it's another to be in such bad shape that the jockey just takes the horse off the track.

I was surprised when I read the phrase with what had to be a different meaning in the newspapers a few years ago, and considered it the result of people neither being sufficiently well read or not believing dictionaries are relevant when learning new words or expressions. An attempt at figuring out what a phrase must mean in context, given no additional meaning. (See "abduction" in wikipedia.org; that's the "logic" people routinely use in determining new meanings of words.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "I don't understand your quibble."
This was posted to me, I did not write any of it. I have already posted back to this person, I was just wondering what everyone else might have tossed in there. BTW, My rebuttle was very similar to yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Ah.
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. my rebuttal
you are redifining your terms to absolve yourself of responsibility for a foolhardy initial decision, a flawed plan, & a stubborn refusal to face facts or change tactics until it is too late.

now you seek to blame others for your failure, when you had all the power & took no advice from any cautionary voices. indeed, rather than acknowledge that our warnings have become reality, you call us traitors & cowards.

so, FUCK YOU, you mendacious, narcissistic sociopaths.

you're getting impeached first, dick cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Your rebuttal : I like it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. It wouldn't be so funny if we didn't have 10000 sound bites of George
saying, 'stay the course.' :rofl:

Oh, silly little children. When will they learn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-24-06 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. No navigator, no charts, no port, and the drunken helmsman has OCD.
Edited on Tue Oct-24-06 04:15 PM by TahitiNut
:shrug: The only variance in the course, headed towrds the reef, is the change in the political wind - a bunch of hot air from a cabal of blowhards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC