Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US and Iraqi insurgent group has begun negotiations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 07:25 PM
Original message
US and Iraqi insurgent group has begun negotiations
http://www.khaleejtimes.ae/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/focusoniraq/2006/October/focusoniraq_October102.xml§ion=focusoniraq&col=

Iraq rebels say they will only negotiate with US
(AFP)

16 October 2006



KIRKUK, Iraq - Masked nationalist insurgents in Iraq told AFP they have begun talks with US forces, after a weekend meeting of Sunni tribal sheikhs called for the restoration of ousted leader Saddam Hussein.

In the northern oil city of Kirkuk, an Iraqi calling himself Abdel Rahman Abu Khula said his movement, a group of former Baath party officials and army officers known as the Islamic Army, would not meet the Iraqi government.

“In reality, we only negotiate with the ruling power in Iraq and that is the occupier,” he said. “Today it is us and the Americans who are controlling the situation in Iraq.”

A US military spokesman had no immediate comment on the claim, which AFP cannot independently verify.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. who said we do not negotiate with terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. interesting-they are dissing their own elected government.


....
“In reality, we only negotiate with the ruling power in Iraq and that is the occupier,” he said. “Today it is us and the Americans who are controlling the situation in Iraq.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They appear to be pragmatists n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. They didn't elect it.
The sunnis were effectively disenfranchised by the imposed government structure. They never signed on to it, completely boycotted the first election, and only halfheartedly participated in the second.

But more importantly, they are simply stating the obvious. The 'Iraqi government' is a fiction. The ruling authority is the occupying american army.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. These guys are the original Baath Party insurgency that never
surrendered. They have never recognized any of the post-invasion governments. They have always used the formulation, as above, that they'll only negotiate with Americans, as the U.S. is the ruling power. It is their way of refusing to recognize any developments in government since the fall of Saddam.

There was Saddam, then there was us. All agreements, laws, etc. entered in to by the CPA or the current government are void. They won't accept any of it unless they work out an agreement with us. They want us to cram their demands down the throats of the Shia.

This isn't the first time we've negotiated with them. Nothing seems to have come of it in the past, but perhaps impending political doom for Republicans has put Bush in a negotiating mood. If he could get the backbone of the Insurgency to agree to join the government, or quit fighting, that would give him something to crow about. Light at the end of the tunnel.

Or, maybe they are discussing the James Baker group's plan that we don't get to hear about until after the election---partitioning Iraq or something like that. I don't think they'll go for partition though, unless they get a guarantee of Oil revenues. We'll probably find out some day that's all they've wanted for two years now, but Dirty Dick would rather see dead American soldiers if it meant letting Sunnis carve off a chunk of those profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-16-06 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. look at the reason they give (for US to talk to them):




........Abu Khula said his group represents some 17 nationalist insurgent organizations, and is seeking the withdrawal of US forces and the release of detainees from US and Iraqi government prisons.

“The Americans have now decided to talk with us due to the escalation of our heroic deeds and the development of our explosives technology for use against their vehicles and bases,” he claimed.

There have been repeated rumours about contacts between the Iraqi government or US forces and the more nationalist elements of the insurgency, but no US official has ever confirmed talks with armed Baathists.

Abu Khula was at pains to distance his group, which is made up of largely secular former regime elements, from Islamist insurgent outfits such as Al Qaeda and Ansar Al Sunna, which are known for attacks targeting civilians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC