Rosco T.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:25 PM
Original message |
| OPINIONS: Shrub could re-institute the DRAFT by EXECUTIVE ORDER |
|
got this thrown at me this morning, Chimpy could re-start the draft by EO since "we're at war", totally bypassing the congress and any oversight. Then he could bulk up, go after Iran and Korea. Probably in November "since Democrats are so weak on national security".
Opinions please.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. No opinions necessary. He can do whatever he wants whenever he wants |
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 7. I thought that was obvious |
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Only if he felt like removing the GOP from power for a generation. |
|
The GOP will never institute a draft, they will tear the volunteer army to shreds, but never restart the draft.
|
Demeter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Only In His Mind Are We At War |
|
he hasn't a legal leg to stand on, and the minute he does such a foolish thing, he will be impeached, tried, convicted, and sent on to the Hague. I guarantee it!
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. I don't understand the "at war" stuff since Congress never declared |
|
war. When did they not have to declare war for us to be "at war?"
|
savemefromdumbya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 8. thought mission was accomplished long time ago? |
SmokingJacket
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 11. If Bush says it, it is so. |
|
Didn't you get that memo? Oh, yeah, wait, it was if Bush merely *thinks* it, it is so. Duh! http://www.antiwar.com/ips/fisher.php?articleid=9222
|
Hosnon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 12. When the war was not started by the United States. Congress has the power |
|
Edited on Thu Oct-12-06 12:49 PM by MJDuncan1982
to initiate an offensive war. A state of war can exist nevertheless, with the U.S. as a participant.
Ex: If the U.S. is directly attacked or if an ally is attacked.
|
savemefromdumbya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. the voters won't be impressed with a draft! |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. He can try, but I don't see anyone falling for it. He'd be run |
|
out of town, and might be anyway. I can hope!
|
mrreowwr_kittty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Is whoever said that in good health and under age 42? |
|
Ask him/her why they haven't enlisted yet. Ask why all able-bodied supporters of the Bush regime and it's foreign policy aren't lining up at the recruiting offices.
They like to compare the current debacle to WW2. Well, during that war EVERYONE pitched in. There were movie actors who enlisted or got commissioned and fought. Everyone else made sacrifices by curtailing their fuel use and rationing food and supplies. The rich got taxed heavily and the middle class bought bonds to pay for the war.
And now? We get hit by terrorists and the President tells people to go shopping. Then mortgages our future to give huge tax CUTS to the wealthy while lavishing money on cronies with no-bid contracts. So-called patriotic Americans slap yellow ribbon magnets on ginormous SUVs.
So some numbnuts thinks the draft should be instituted. Does said numbnuts also support disallowing like college deferments so that young Dick Cheney types won't be able to avoid combat?
|
Lone_Star_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 12:39 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. I think if he did the call to impeach him would be loud and long |
|
And coming from the republican side of the aisle.
|
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. Only the congress can raise and fund armies. |
roamer65
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 01:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 14. Only if he wants massive draft riots. |
|
Lincoln had to quell mass riots in response to his draft during the civil war. Raisinbrain is even more unpopular than Lincoln was during that time period.
|
Rosco T.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 15. Yeah, but Shrub has Halliburton camps and Blackwater to help him.... |
PreacherCasey
(717 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
| 16. conscientious objector |
kenny blankenship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message |
patcox2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 01:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 18. We should pray he does, but he won't. |
|
The liberal democrats have proposed a bill to reinstate the draft and the republicans oppose it. They know the public would not stand for it. If Bush did this, he'd be doing exactly what we want him to do. I'd laugh at whoever said that and say "then the fact that he doesn't proves he doesn't take this war seriously."
|
RobinA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
to the Iraq war, reinstate the draft. Frankly, I think it would be a good thing, war-wise. It would make a much larger portion of the population have a much larger stake in any war we decide to wage. It's all well and good to walk around supporting a war when you have nothing to lose, but how would the public's opinion of when to take up arms change if the majority of it knew someone or was someone who could actually suffer from the consequences? Make every baby boomer's kid potential cannon fodder, and I doubt we'll see John Kerry et al. giving the President a blank check to wage war.
|
Dems Will Win
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message |
| 19. The President simply needs a 1-page Trigger Resolution |
|
reinstating the DRAFT system that has been takin names all these years.
He cannot do it through a signing statement or Executive Order.
I predict Stay the Course means a Republican DRAFT passed this Nov. or Dec.
A 1-page "Trigger Resolution" No new law or bill or legislation is needed. It's all ready to go: Combat (for Men only age 20-21), Skills (everyone under 35) and Medical (ALL Medical personnel under 45).
I am DU's resident DRAFT expert so ask me anything.
By the way, your ass is grass!
|
alfredo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
| 22. Could they hide that Trigger Resolution in a much larger bill? |
Jack Rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-12-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Jun 19th 2013, 06:08 PM
Response to Original message |