Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ROVE Pressured Foley Into Staying In Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:14 AM
Original message
ROVE Pressured Foley Into Staying In Congress
Edited on Thu Oct-12-06 09:14 AM by kpete
HOW ROVE TWISTED FOLEY'S ARM:

............

But when Foley's friend saw the Congressman again this spring, something had changed. To the source's surprise, Foley told him he would indeed be standing for re-election. What happened? Karl Rove intervened.

According to the source, Foley said he was being pressured by "the White House and Rove gang," who insisted that Foley run. If he didn't, Foley was told, it might impact his lobbying career.

"He said, 'The White House made it very clear I have to run,'" explains Foley's friend, adding that Foley told him that the White House promised that if Foley served for two more years it would "enhance his success" as a lobbyist. "I said, 'I thought you wanted out of this?' And he said, 'I do, but they're scared of losing the House and the thought of two years of Congressional hearings, so I have two more years of duty.'"

The White House declined a request for comment on the matter, but obviously the plan hasn't worked out quite as Rove hoped it would.

--Ryan Lizza

more at:
http://www.tnr.com/blog/theplank?pid=47854
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hello, Gorgeous! What beautiful legs you have
go out there and knock em dead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well put!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
30. LOL... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
station agent Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. Yeah I've been waiting for this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. "...it might impact his lobbying career." It is HIGH time to remove the
stench of bribery and extortion from the halls of Congress. Every dollar a lobbyist spends to influence a Congressperson's vote, is a dollar spent against the will of the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. One way
Edited on Thu Oct-12-06 09:25 AM by StClone
IS for Government financed elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
31. That would definitely be a step in the right direction. We also heard
recently (here in DU) that approximately $200,000,000 (two hundred million dollars) A MONTH!!! is spent on lobbying members of Congress. I say again, $200-million A MONTH! That is downright obscene. In addition is the expectation that if a Congressperson plays the game and votes the way they're told, they can slide into a lucrative lobbying career once their "public service" gig is up. What a crock!

And I ask you, how many of our legislators approved this Iraq fiasco because it served the needs of the Petroleum lobby, the Armament and Weapons lobby, the Private Security lobby, etc.? I don't for one minute believe that the majority of Congress was simply "taken in" by bushco*'s lies and deceit. I ask you, whose best interests did Congress serve?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #31
50. What kind of Toxic medicine cost 60 Million?
That is what Ken Mehlman (RNC) will spend against Howard Dean spending 12 million to get candidates messages out. If a product (the R's) is so bad that it takes five times as much money to influence the vote (and barely win while cheating) what kind of "unsafe at any speed" are the consumers (voters) falling for? Corporations and crooks are donating money to the RNC hand over fist to protect their activities -- what rotten influence they have over the Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Bingo!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. if this can be double-sourced
by credible people, this is a huge development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. It is heresay and would not stand up in court.
And shouldn't be believed UNLESS Foley says it. Sorry, lots of smelly stories around this morning. I don't doubt the WH hands down orders and it could be true that Rove wanted him to run but this is bs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. agree
Edited on Thu Oct-12-06 10:07 AM by TexasLawyer
I would be sceptical of stories like this.

But maybe Foley has sent some Instant Messages with this information! LOL He seems indiscrete sexually, so maybe he's indiscrete politically too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #21
61. I don't doubt the story for a nanosecond.
Trust the worst about the repukes - you'll never be sorry.

So far, all the "but I have to have proof" crap has been PROVEN TO BE TRUE (to the accuser's favor) when is comes the the repuke party...

Better than house odds in Vegas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Atlanta Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. Missing the point?
I agree this would be hearsay in a court of law because it doesn't fit within any recognized exclusion from the hearsay rule. But the court we want to impact is not a court of law but the court of public opinion. I think if this could be confirmed by another source it just adds to the generally recognized belief that this WH is all about two things - MONEY and POWER. They will do anything to accrue and maintain as much of both as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
29. It's either hearsay or heresy but not both ...
Although I suppose that hearsay COULD be heresy ...

Actually, there are all sorts of exceptions to the hearsay rule that will get it into evidence in court -- e.g., an admission against one's interest, or a dying declaration, or an "excited utterance." It also depends on the purpose for which it is offered as evidence. Just because it's hearsay doesn't mean it's automatically excluded.

Bake, Esq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
37. I guess you missed my point then
Just because someone said someone said something doesn't mean they said it. For me anyway, there needs to be a little more confirmation before I would accept it as a fact. Even if I WANT to believe it. So that is the standard to which I am holding the comments.

I could say something like "dbaker41 is a friend of mine, and he told me that so and so told him>___________________(<insert what you want to hear, here). Doesn't mean it is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Actually, I did get your point (and I tend to agree)
I was simply addressing the hearsay reference in a perhaps snarky manner. People often think that hearsay never gets into court, but in fact it can.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. kpete has the best goodies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
70. she does have some uncanny luck or skills in that area, does she not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. That's straight-out bribery.
There's a promise of future renumeration. That's actionable. Rove should be prosecuted for bribing a Congressman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plaid Adder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. It's also blackmail.
My guess is that Foley only reported the bribery half of the conversation.

C'mon, everyone in the GOP Congressional chain of command appears to have known about Foley's thing for pages. There's no way Rove wouldn't use that against Foley if he thought it was necessary.

I'm telling you, when this all comes out in the wash you will find out that blackmail was what greased the wheels of the whole Republican machine.

C ya,

The Plaid Adder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tex-wyo-dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. I don't doubt this for a moment...
although a lot of cases would be hard to prove in a court of law unless the affected came forward, what is obvious is the pattern of decete by so many including some Dems...the most plausable explanation is sort of behavior is some form of blackmail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
40. I don't doubt it for one moment. Too many rethuglicans think lock-step
and walk jack-booted, almost as if choreographed. Blackmail and extortion have long been the weapons of choice and intimidation of a repressive culture. The bush* regime has ALL the hallmarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
53. If we're looking for anologies, it's not grease, it's the nuts & bolts
The entire machine is held together by dirty secrets.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
54. Oh, the twist and turns!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
57. Plaid Adder, I agree but Foley was not the target... he was the bait.
If his transgressions ever came out -- and we have no reason to believe Rove wanted them to come out -- anyone who ever so much as held hands with Foley -- and there were many pages recruited to become staffers on the basis of Foley's casting couch, according to David Brock -- would be tarred and feathered.

Mutually assured destruction.

Fear will keep the House staffers in line -- the people that run our government -- fear of association with this congressman. No need to release such damaging info to the public. Then you can no longer use those people to control Congress. Why do you think they were all in the senior leadership?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. I LOVE IT
Edited on Thu Oct-12-06 09:26 AM by symbolman
Oh BABY.. now if we can just spread this far and wide.. that ROVE SUPPORTED a pederast for POLITICAL GAIN :)

LOVE them LONG LEGS, yeah, you said it :)

If this ain't QUID PRO QUO I don't know what is..

BRING IT ON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Don't worry, Foley, we'll control the religious Nuts and...you'll still..
...have all the Pageboys you desire.

Just don't give up that Congressional seat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. Let's push the hell out of the Rove angle
till we're blue in the face, the farther we push Rove in the corner the nastier he'll be, the nastier the more mistakes the lunatic will make.

Also, we add to the internal rage in the conservative movement about the cover up. And for Rove to insist that Foley run again throws gas on a raging fire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. What a bunch of criminals
Thanks Kpete. I'm loving it! :popcorn: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. Not quite a newsbuster yet
Edited on Thu Oct-12-06 09:43 AM by Tarc
On its face now, there honestly isn't much to run with here. The average person isn't really going to care all that much if all it is is Rove wanting Foley to run again back in March, regardless of the lobbyist strong-arming.

What would set this angle into maximum overdrive is IF it can be shown that Karl Rove knew about Foley's sexual predator activity AT THE TIME he pressured Foley into running again. Prove that, and the Bush administration comes tumbling down, Nixon-style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
16. it might impact his lobbying career.
Whoop..there it is..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. Two years of Congressional hearings---music to my ears!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
18. How fitting that it blows up in their face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
19. Rove would run Charles Manson if he thought he'd win the district
What did Rove know and when did he know it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. This I like!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. Well that's good to know - "scared of losing the House"
Gives me a bit of hope the machines aren't entirely under their control and we may be able to win. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #22
32. My thoughts exactly
Probably too many different races to be able to hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. Hubris will get them in the end...
Edited on Thu Oct-12-06 10:17 AM by formercia
Oh,the humanity!!... :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArmchairMeme Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
24. Win for Rove
How it might play in Rove's playbook is he knew about Foley and he kept Foley until it was a convenient time to unleash it to the MSM. Rove will make it into a win for the Repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
46. The plan hasn't worked out quite as Rove hoped it would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
56. Oh For God's sake... see post #55
The purpose of blackmail info is to withold it, not release it.

Once you release it you can no longer use it to keep gay staffers in line.

Foley was damaged goods. He was being kept in office to blackmail other people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Scarecrow Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
25. The Repedophans ...
always looking out for each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
27. Great news...I have been waiting for Rove's name
to enter this story. Rove knew all about Foley's sexual history...and he blackmailed him into staying in Congress so the repugs could keep the House and not face Justice.

Scream it from the rooftops! This is campaign season and we gotta win so to keep our Democracy!

Tell Keith Olbermann!!!

Thx kpete!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #27
34. this should be sent by everyone to the members of the Ethics Committee
so they can try to get Rove and Foley to testify about this under oath.

http://www.house.gov/ethics/CommitteeMembers.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
33. Not surprising.
K&R!

Keep this in the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
35. If true, can we now please admit
that Rove is not the all-knowing evil genius we give him credit as being? If he were, he wouldn't take the chance of keeping a pedophile around just to pad the number of Repubs in the House. Wouldn't he have turned to some other Congresscritter instead?

Hm. Then again...maybe he likes perverts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
36. Can DU now get over it's "Rove is an evil genius" bs?
Rove isn't a genius, he's just an unethical opportunist at best. Now the question begs to be asked: Did Rove know about Foley's page problem when he pressured Foley to stay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
38. My BS meter is registering at "high" right now.
I consider The New Republic to be a reliable media source, but it's all too plum-perfect to create a backlash setup. Anonymous sources just don't cut it for something which has the potential for this much damage. Pox News gets away with it all the time, but their audience is gullible with a capital G.

The White House declined to comment, which means either it's true or they don't think it's even worthy of a comment.

It doesn't matter to most people what Rove did or said. He isn't up for election. He will be in the cross-hairs if we take over the House, but most Americans just don't realize his influence and don't care what he said or didn't say to Foley.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Mine too. I think Tom Hartman was having a contest to name the Repuke's
October Surprise and I was of the mind that the Foley thing WAS the repukes OS. I figured rove did the leaking and it appears he had a little more to do with this than it would at first seem.


NOTE: I am not saying it was a GOOD plan or that it is working out as INTENDED, just that rove wanted to abuse the gay part of the god/guns/gays card one more time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
43. Kick this one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No DUplicitous DUpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
44. Thanks Kpete...
Keep them coming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
45. Question, Is there any reason Rove won't be called to testify under oath?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davepc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
47. This isn't so hard to believe
Rove wanted to blackmail Foley into keeping his seat. One less open seat to have to defend and spend money on.

Foley wanted to leave, so Rove went about a campaign to destroy his beltway rep to deny him the ability to become a good K street citizen.

Unfortunately for Rove his controlled burn of Foley's reputation turned into a full fledged forest fire when the story gained enough credibility and legs to make it to the mainstream media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
65. That's a very interesting take on it.
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
48. With the GOP and ROVE: Party before the People. Its so Obvious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
49. If Karl Rove knew about it, George W Bush knew about it...
If George W Bush knew about it, it has not been said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
51. MSM scared sh*tless to approach Rove for a statement!!!!!! damn it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
52. Keeping Foley around until they need a major deflection
I think now we can connect a few a dots here. Karl convinces Foley he has to run, yet they keep their distance from Foley as Foley complains to Jeb that Bush is ignoring him. On the day that the Torture Bill is passed in congress the news of Foley is leaked. It appears to me that they kept Foley around knowing what he had been up to and when they needed a major deflection they let loose with the Foley news and the talking heads run with it. I just don't think that they calculated how many Republicans would be taken down with the story.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Foley's e-mail to governor voices fear White House snubbed him
By Dara Kam
Palm Beach Post Capital Bureau
Thursday, October 12, 2006

TALLAHASSEE E-mails from former U.S. Rep. Mark Foley to Gov. Jeb Bush reveal that Foley feared two years ago the White House was shunning him, and he called on the governor, President Bush's brother, to intercede.

Foley wrote to Gov. Bush on Sept. 29, 2004: "Have I done something to offend the White House ... I am always getting the shaft ... they came to ft pierce a few weeks ago and said I was not allowed to attend ... yet joe negron is there ...

"Tomorrow Potus is in Martin County and I am told I am not allowed to be there either. I can't quite figure what I have done but this is a continuing pattern of slights ... I have constantly put the President in the best possible light on everything from haiti to hurricanes ... sorry to trouble you ... and I wouldn't if this wasn't so frequent ..."

POTUS is an acronym for president of the United States. Foley's message referred to President Bush's visits to Florida in the aftermath of Hurricane Jeanne.

Bush responded that day: "I will try to help. I know it is nothing you have done. Promise. I think it relates to debate prep time. Jeb."

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/nation/epaper...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #52
60. Foley was damaged goods. They kept him as bait, NOT for public consumption
Why do you think red-light districts are allowed to flourish for decades? They are kept around because they are a great treasure trove of political blackmail.

The situation with Foley is even worse because the pages who slept with him, who were simply closeted gays, were being actively promoted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #52
62. bwahahaha, "debate prep time" =we know you're a perv & we're done with you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
55. I posted this on the BLACKMAIL threads a week ago. Very few of you replied
Apparently the preposterous notion (preposterous to everyone except David Brock and the Washington Monthly) that Rove and DeLay were using Foley to blackmail gay staffers is just too far out for some folks. You must first get confirmation from the neoliberal New Republic.
:eyes:
Wake me up when y'all get around to questioning whether Foley went on Marianas junkets with DeLay and dozens of staffers.

Heck, wake me up when you get around to reading what David Brock, Lawrence O'Donnell and Ana Marie Cox were saying about "The Velvet Mafia" and hioow it was run out of DeLay's office.

You remember DeLay? The person Newt assigned to blackmail "moderate" Republican staffers BEFORE Rove came along? The only reason people hated him to begin with? Oh, how memories are short.

Rove's connection to the "Velvet Mafia" (named after Tom "Velvet Glove" DeLay, who was assigned in 1995 to use blackmail if necessary to keep House staffers in line):

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Why Rove needed Foley to remain (who occupied a safe Republican district) in order to blackmail staffers (many of whom were former pages) by association with Foley (said info to be kept safely in Rove's desk):

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Did Foley attend DeLay's Marianas junkets with staffers in tow? Yes or no? Thread still active, researchers needed!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

Summary of the BLACKMAIL threads on DU:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #55
59. Still no replies..if folks understand anything about blackmail PLEASE READ
Edited on Thu Oct-12-06 02:43 PM by Leopolds Ghost
Help us out. See this thread, it is still active.

House staffers were the ones being blackmailed. Some of them were having, or had had sex with Foley as a page. These people were later promoted. The only way to disrupt such a scheme is to get to the heart of it.

So... I ask again, did Foley go on junkets with congressmen, pages or staffers?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
58. Rove is like a mob boss...
This man is just pure evil. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
63. MSM is giving Rove a free pass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
64. Kpete I just love you!
You always find the best things to post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #64
68. Thanks and loving all of you back!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
66. Good God...will it never end. KR for kpete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synnical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-12-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
67. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-13-06 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
69. NO, the plan hasn't worked out.
Best laid plans of mice and men....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jul 29th 2014, 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC