This "Accident" CANNOT be a Terrorist Attack! Terror Attack BAD FOR BUSH!

[FrenchieCat]

Because an actual attack is not "good" for the GOP elections....it is only a FOILED Terrorist attack plan that will do.....Because if this was even "suspected" as a Terror Attack.....this would make BushCo look very bad considering the "There has been no terrorist attacks in the U.S. since 9/11" mantra we have been fed.

The news will continue to say this is an "Accident", no matter what it is!

After the "explosions" in Iraq yesterday.......I repeat, this cannot be a Terrorist attack! (Yeah....sure!)

[LostinVA]

1. I was thinking that, too

[FrenchieCat]

Yep....hope other DUers start to realize that only a plot is good.....

a successful attack, especially in NYC...not so much!

[jilln]

2. I believe at this point that it was an accident...

but it would be easy enough to spin, all they have to say is that they foiled THE REST of the plot! Which they can't tell us about, yada yada yada, state secrets, etc.

[FrenchieCat]

6. Damage is damage! If this was shown the be a terrorist attack,

Bush and them can't say that they are great at National Security. This is the same city, same weapon. Nope, this would not be good for Bush if it turns out to be a Terrorist attack.

This will continued to be an "accident", no matter what it actually is!

[Dorian Gray]

3. Well

the news channels seem to be presenting it as only an accident. Nothing else.

[FrenchieCat]

11. Yes....because that is better for Bush! But

notice that if there's some crazy person on an airplane that has to end up landing, now that's covered as though it's terrorism until later on!

However, this is in reverse.....could be a Terrorist attack, but is reported only as an "Accident"! Now why would this be?

[Dorian Gray]

17. Because it was an accident...

as we have now learned. I'm glad that it wasn't reported as terroristic in nature, as that would have been more scare-mongering.

[AlCzervik]

4. if this was an attack wouldn't they be clearing the air space? Seems

to be a lot of news copters flying around there. I think it's accident.

[Freedom_from_Chains]

Well if I had to place bets right now I would say accident,

but who knows, we will just have to see how this develops. But if the election continues to go into the toilet for the pubs like it is now, we could in fact be in for some tough times in the near future.

[Bluebear]

5. Especially on 10/11 . . . NO reason to suspect terror. NONE.

Now please go Christmas shopping.

[japple]

7. Was Dennis Hastert on board? N/T

[Bluebear]

8. No, it took off OK.

Sorry.

[aquart]

9. It doesn't matter if it's an accident.

THEY HAVE NO IDEA WHO WAS FLYING OVER NEW YORK! None. Zilch. Nada. Maybe they hope to find the pilot's wallet.

Boy, that's a lot of security.

They just proved that ANYBODY can fly a plane into a building if they feel like it. So it wasn't deliberate today, the 11th? What about next month? They still won't know who's flying over this city!

I am furious.

[FrenchieCat]

10. So let's see if any "reporter" on any of the channels make that point.....

Good Luck!

[FrenchieCat]

12. Fox says it IS NOT A TERRORIST ATTACK.....

So there ya go!

[VeggieTart]

18. Keith Olbermann said it appeared to be an accident

Apparently, something on the plane malfunctioned and there was a distress call from the plane moments before it crashed.

[bowens43]

13. This is why they call us moonbats

[Bluebear]

14. Do tell?

So you subscribe to instant diagnosis of what is and what is not terror?

[FrenchieCat]

15. Why?

Please elaborate!

[FrenchieCat]

16. Hit and Run?

I don't get it!