Allowing Erosion Of Liberties Removes Incentive F/ Bush To Protect Us

KittyWampus

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-25-06 11:22 AM
Original message

Allowing Erosion Of Liberties Removes Incentive F/ Bush To Protect Us

If Bush is allowed to use terrorist threats as a reason to amass more power for himself and his office, what incentive does he have to STOP terrorist threats?

If every time an act of terrorism happens, we give up more civil liberties and give the Executive office more power, it seems obvious that allowing terrorism to happen is profitable for the sitting Executive.

Especially when the person occupying the Executive position and the people in the Administration around him are all on record WANTING more exective power as a matter of principle.

Isn't this kind of a simple to understand point?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Name removed

(0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jan-25-06 11:41 AM
Response to Original message

1. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:08 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.