|
|
|
This topic is archived. |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
|
| OneBlueSky
|
Mon Oct-09-06 03:57 PM Original message |
| unbelievable . . . they've started going after Olbermann, and . . . |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| |
| rumpel
|
Mon Oct-09-06 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 1. what is the GOP obsession with sex? n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| libhill
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:11 PM Response to Reply #1 |
| 26. I've often wondered about that myself - |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| silverweb
|
Mon Oct-09-06 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
| 2. Keith's on-air response should be scathing. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| marmar
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 3. This is just rock bottom... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Dinger
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:05 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 11. Yup, Keith Ought To Be Good - He Always Is (nt) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| TechBear_Seattle
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
| 19. No where near rock bottom |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RobertSeattle
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
| 4. And I bet Limbaugh's a real Romeo... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren DeMontague
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:10 PM Response to Reply #4 |
| 23. Or Bill O'Reilly. Wow. Sex-x-x-x-y! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Vincardog
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
| 5. The reich can only think with one head and it is not the big one |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| izzie
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 6. That is funny. Guess some men who write such stuff will |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| libhill
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
| 10. In which case... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| izzie
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:59 PM Response to Reply #10 |
| 47. To bad Bush can not keep pages safe like he does us? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| nam78_two
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
| 7. how low can they get...Oh wait... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Carni
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 8. Really pathetic |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WCGreen
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 9. At least he doesn't have to use bathroom cleaning devices |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rex
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
| 12. Eh, it is the NYP. They report Elvis married bigfoot when ratings are down |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Lost-in-FL
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
| 13. I know for sure there's lots of volunteers here |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| spag68
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 14. New York Post |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Mabus
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 15. Aren't Page Six reporters dropping like flies due to improprieties? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| aikoaiko
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 16. laughable smear.... he must be doing something right. ;-) |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| libhill
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
| 17. A sign of their overwhelming desperation - |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| spoony
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
| 18. That "article" is dumb on so many levels |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| RufusEarl
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 20. So she's calling KO a cad? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| spag68
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:11 PM Response to Reply #20 |
| 25. Smartest move possible. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Blue Diadem
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 21. I think it speaks more about her character than it does him. n/t |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Vidar
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:41 PM Response to Reply #21 |
| 44. I agree. What a lowlife. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren DeMontague
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
| 22. If he was such a crappy date and lousy lay... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| AZBlue
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 24. It's just Murdoch's reply to KO's dressing-down for their anthrax story. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Catherine Vincent
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 27. Oh good grief! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| liberal N proud
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:11 PM Response to Original message |
| 28. We all knew they would go after him |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| madmusic
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
| 29. Even if ALL OF IT IS TRUE, so what! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren DeMontague
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:18 PM Response to Reply #29 |
| 32. I don't think he will. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| madmusic
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:21 PM Response to Reply #32 |
| 36. Happens billions of time, every night... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Warren DeMontague
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:24 PM Response to Reply #36 |
| 39. Noooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| madmusic
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:39 PM Response to Reply #39 |
| 42. Yessssssss, or else... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| WinkyDink
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:16 PM Response to Original message |
| 30. No problemo; neither a dead girl nor a live boy! |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| bklyncowgirl
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
| 31. The man must be a saint if that's all they can find on him. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| mondo joe
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 33. So she's admitting that she's a liar? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| emdee
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
| 34. I wonder if Page Six gave that much space to ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| GeorgeGist
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
| 35. I'm surprised ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| EstimatedProphet
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
| 37. That will only work on the retarded |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| madfloridian
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
| 38. Owned by Rupert Murdoch. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Greylyn58
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
| 40. That is really disgusting |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| MadMaddie
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
| 41. Just curious why they had to add Carribian descent in describing |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Name removed
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
| 43. Deleted message |
| MzNov
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
| 45. what is this, HIGH SCHOOL?? |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| patricia92243
|
Mon Oct-09-06 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
| 46. Unbelievably childish. That's probably why he didn't want to have anythi |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rockstone
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
| 48. This blog is open to invited readers only |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Shakespeare
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:15 PM Response to Reply #48 |
| 50. Wow. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Rockstone
|
Tue Oct-10-06 06:17 PM Response to Reply #50 |
| 52. sorry, that was meant sarcastically |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| Union Thug
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:06 PM Response to Original message |
| 49. This is what the post calls 'news'? Looks like another big "who the ... |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| hsher
|
Tue Oct-10-06 12:58 AM Response to Original message |
| 51. Ick. |
| Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
| DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 24th 2013, 02:34 AM Response to Original message |
| Advertisements [?] |
| Top |
| Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
|
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC